• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
454,409 results

No. 2153

Document USA v. Bd Of Comm Ham Co, et al, 1:02-cv-00107, No. 2153 (S.D.Ohio Feb. 28, 2025)
None of Ms. Melson’s neighbors reported backups on or around March 7 or May 19, 2022.
cite Cite Document

No. 2140

Document USA v. Bd Of Comm Ham Co, et al, 1:02-cv-00107, No. 2140 (S.D.Ohio Dec. 6, 2024)
This matter is before the Court on the Request for Review of the denial of a Sewer Back Up (“SBU”) claim by Onur Demiryurek (Doc. 2111), the Metropolitan Sewer District of Greater Cincinnati (“MSD”)’s response thereto (Doc. 2130), and MSD’s Supplemental Response to Ms. Demiryurek’s Request for Review, indicating Ms. Demiryurek amended her SBU claim to change the claimant name to MRD USA LLC, the owner of the property (Doc. 2139).
This plan also provides a means for occupants to recover damages arising from backups that are the result of MSD’s negligent maintenance, destruction, operation or upkeep of the Sewer System.
The CCTV inspection also identified a broken or cracked pipe and offset joint near the building’s foundation on the private portion of Ms. Demiryurek’s property and a partial blockage of the lateral in the middle of the yard.
In addition, Stantec recommended that the front two downspout discharge locations, which tied into the building lateral, be rerouted downstream of the proposed outdoor grinder pump.
A property owner, and not MSD, is responsible for damage resulting from a basement backup caused by a break or blockage in the building sewer lateral line.
cite Cite Document

No. 2125

Document USA v. Bd Of Comm Ham Co, et al, 1:02-cv-00107, No. 2125 (S.D.Ohio Oct. 18, 2024)
On October 10, 2024, the Court held a hearing on Mr. Dixon’s request for review at which Mr. Dixon and MSD’s Wastewater Collection Division Principal Engineer Maureen Richard, P.E., testified and documentary evidence was submitted.
This plan also provides a means for occupants to recover damages arising from backups that are the result of MSD’s negligent maintenance, destruction, operation or upkeep of the Sewer System.
MSD Principal Engineer Maureen Richard testified that the relative elevations of the downstream manhole from Mr. Dixon’s property made it unlikely that a surcharge of the public sewer rose to the level of Mr. Dixon’s basement.
The Court is persuaded that the elevations of the relevant manholes and Mr. Dixon’s property make it unlikely his basement experienced a backup as a result of a lack of capacity in the MSD public sewer.
Yet, this Court is bound by the terms of the Consent Decree in this matter, which places the burden of proof on the homeowner/claimant to show that a capacity-related public sewer problem was the cause of the damage to a property.
cite Cite Document

Acushnet Company v. Jeffrey William Woodworth

Docket 91234606, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (May 17, 2017)
Case TypeOpposition
MarksTITLEIST #1 BALL IN GOLF., THE ILLEST, TEAM TITLEIST, TITLEIST
Applicant Jeffrey William Woodworth
Opposer Acushnet Company
cite Cite Docket

Acushnet Company v. Woodworth, Jeffrey William

Docket 85428865, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (Apr. 27, 2017)
Case TypeExtension of Time
TagsExtension, Time
MarksTHE ILLEST
Defendant Woodworth, Jeffrey William
Potential Opposer Acushnet Company
cite Cite Docket

No. 2061

Document USA v. Bd Of Comm Ham Co, et al, 1:02-cv-00107, No. 2061 (S.D.Ohio May. 17, 2023)
Log in to see more
cite Cite Document

No. 2049

Document USA v. Bd Of Comm Ham Co, et al, 1:02-cv-00107, No. 2049 (S.D.Ohio Jan. 10, 2023)
Log in to see more
cite Cite Document

No. 2047

Document USA v. Bd Of Comm Ham Co, et al, 1:02-cv-00107, No. 2047 (S.D.Ohio Jan. 9, 2023)
Log in to see more
cite Cite Document
1 2 3 4 5 ... >>