• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Active Filters1
184 results

Defu Gao v. Hui Li

Docket 91265037, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (Sept. 29, 2020)
Case TypeOpposition
MarksXIJIADE, XI JIA DE
Applicant Hui Li
Opposer Defu Gao
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

Defu Gao v. Hui Li

Docket 88934055, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (Sept. 2, 2020)
Case TypeExtension of Time
TagsExtension, Time
MarksXIJIADE
Defendant Hui Li
Potential Opposer Defu Gao
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

Derricks Sylvester Tims v. Derricks Sylvester Tims

Docket 2017-50602, New York State, Dutchess County, Supreme Court (Mar. 9, 2017)
Hal B Greenwald, presiding
Case TypeOther Matters - Name Change
TagsOther, Matters, Name Change
Plaintiff - Petitioner Derricks Sylvester Tims
Defendant - Respondent Derricks Sylvester Tims
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

MS. USA PRIME

Docket 90894376, Trademark (Aug. 20, 2021)
ClassEntertainment in the nature of pageant competitions; 100; 101; 107
MarksMS. USA PRIME
Original Applicant Kristen Ayers
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

MRS. USA PRIME

Docket 90894354, Trademark (Aug. 20, 2021)
Case TypeService mark
ClassEntertainment in the nature of pageant competitions; 100; 101; 107
MarksMRS. USA PRIME
Original Applicant Kristen Ayers
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

No. 7 - Board Decision: Opposition Sustained

Document Defu Gao v. Hui Li, 91265037, No. 7 (T.T.A.B. Jan. 11, 2021)
Trademark Trial and Appeal Board P.O.
By the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board: On November 30, 2020, the Board issued a notice of default to Applicant because no answer had been filed.
No response to the notice of default has been filed.
Accordingly, judgment by default is hereby entered against Applicant, the opposition is sustained, and registration to Applicant is refused.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 6 - Notice of Default

Document Defu Gao v. Hui Li, 91265037, No. 6 (T.T.A.B. Nov. 30, 2020)
Victoria von Vistauxx, Paralegal Specialist: On October 16, 2020, the Board allowed Applicant time to file and serve an answer which complies with Fed. R. Civ.
Inasmuch as it appears that no answer has been filed, nor has Applicant filed a motion to further extend the time to file an answer, notice of default is hereby entered against Applicant pursuant to Fed. R. Civ.
Applicant is allowed until thirty days from the date of this order to show cause why judgment by default should not be entered against Applicant in accordance with Fed. R. Civ.
The failure to file a timely answer tolls all deadlines, including the discovery conference, until the issue of default is resolved.
The schedule for the discovery conference, initial disclosures, discovery and trial will be reset in the event that the Board resumes proceedings.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 2 - Notice and Trial Dates Sent; Answer Due:

Document Defu Gao v. Hui Li, 91265037, No. 2 (T.T.A.B. Sep. 29, 2020)
An answer filed on paper under these limited circumstances must be accompanied by a Petition to the Director (and the required fee under Trademark Rule 2.6).
A request for Board participation must be made either through ESTTA, or by telephone call to the assigned interlocutory attorney named on the TTABVUE record for this proceeding.
During their conference, the parties are to discuss whether they wish to seek mediation or arbitration, and whether they can stipulate to the Board's Accelerated Case Resolution (ACR) process for a more efficient and cost-effective means of obtaining the Board’s determination of the proceeding.
Regarding the scope and limits of discovery, see TBMP 414; discoverable items may include documents, tangible things, and electronically stored information (ESI).
Regarding the procedures and deadlines for pretrial disclosures and trial, and specifically the noticing, taking, serving and submitting of evidence and testimony, see Trademark Rules 2.120(k), 2.121, 2.122, 2.123 and 2.125, as well as TBMP Chapter 700.
cite Cite Document
Analyze
1 2 3 4 5 ... 11 12 13 >>