• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Active Filters1
650 results

State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Gavin Patrick Meany, Appellant.

Docket A24-1059, Minnesota State, Court of Appeals (July 1, 2024)
Case TypeStandard - Criminal - Sentencing-Probation Revocation
TagsStandard, Criminal, Sentencing-Probation Revocation
Appellant Gavin Patrick Meany
Respondent State of Minnesota
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

Order - Dismiss - Notice or Stipulated

Document State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Gavin Patrick Meany, Appellant., A24-1059, 1344851 (Minn. Ct. App. Oct. 14, 2024)
By order filed on August 20, 2024, processing of this appeal was stayed.
The appellant has now filed a notice of voluntary dismissal.
The stay of processing is dissolved.
This appeal is dismissed.
Dated: October 14, 2024
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Order - Stay Appeal - Status Letters Due the 19th of the Month

Document State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Gavin Patrick Meany, Appellant., A24-1059, 1335670 (Minn. Ct. App. Aug. 20, 2024)
Appellant, who is represented by counsel, seeks review of the district court’s April 3, 2024 sentencing order after remand for resentencing by this court.
On August 7, 2024, appellant filed a motion to stay this appeal and remand the matter to the district court to pursue postconviction relief related to the ineffective assistance of trial counsel with respect to counsel’s failure to request a restitution hearing.
On August 9, 2024, appellant filed a second motion to stay this appeal and remand jurisdiction to the district court for postconviction proceedings.
Although we express no opinion on appellant’s characterization of the procedural history of this case, we note that his assertions are not belied by the district court register of actions and appear to present unresolved questions of fact relevant to this appeal.
Accordingly, we conclude that there is good cause to stay this appeal and to remand jurisdiction to the district court to permit appellant to pursue postconviction relief.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Order - Deny-Appellant's Motion to Stay Appeal is Denied; Appellant's Brief Remains Due on 8/12/24.

Document State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Gavin Patrick Meany, Appellant., A24-1059, 1333549 (Minn. Ct. App. Aug. 8, 2024)
Appellant, who is represented by counsel, seeks review of the district court’s April 3, 2024 sentencing order after remand for resentencing.
Appellant’s brief is due on August 12, 2024, which is within 30 days after the final transcript was delivered electronically to appellant’s counsel on July 11, 2024.
On August 7, 2024, appellant filed a motion to stay this appeal and remand the matter to the district court.
denied (Minn. Mar. 14, 1995); see also Frisch v. State, 840 N.W.2d 426, 429 (Minn. App. 2013) (holding that rule 28.02, subdivision 4(4), does not apply to an appeal from the denial of a postconviction petition).
Because a challenge to the ineffective assistance of counsel regarding counsel’s failure to request a restitution hearing in regard to a restitution amount that was imposed in the original sentencing hearing is beyond the scope of an appeal from the district court’s April 3, 2024 resentencing order, a stay of this appeal to permit appellant to pursue such relief does not serve the goal of efficient case management.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Transcript - Order for - Karli Pikala

Document State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Gavin Patrick Meany, Appellant., A24-1059, 1327363 (Minn. Ct. App. Jul. 1, 2024)
5(12) of the Rules of Criminal Procedure, please promptly note your acceptance of the request for transcript(s) by filling out the bottom of this form.
4, requires that “To the extent possible, the transcript of a trial or other single court proceeding shall be consecutively paginated, regardless of the number of volumes”.
Once the transcripts are filed and delivered to counsel of record, please forward an itemized statement of your billing to my secretary based on criminal statutory fees (Which includes number of pages, amount per page, and a bill total).
Dated: July 01, 2024 To: Clerk of Appellate Courts 25 Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.
Dated:______________________ cc: Court Administrator Prosecuting Attorney Appellate Public Defender
cite Cite Document
Analyze

In re Welfare of: D. A. D., Child

Docket A17-0476, Minnesota State, Court of Appeals (Mar. 22, 2017)
Case TypeStandard - Civil - Juvenile Delinq.-Non-EJJ/Certification
TagsStandard, Civil, Juvenile Delinquency, Certification
Appellant D. A. D.
Respondent State of Minnesota
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Christopher Michael Means, Appellant

Docket A16-1805, Minnesota State, Court of Appeals (Nov. 10, 2016)
Case TypeStandard - Criminal - Conviction or Order (Defense Appeal)
TagsStandard, Criminal, Conviction or Order, Defense Appeal, Appeal
Appellant Christopher Michael Means
Respondent State of Minnesota
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

State of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Hannah Christie Weyh, Appellant

Docket A16-1811, Minnesota State, Court of Appeals (Nov. 10, 2016)
Case TypeStandard - Criminal - Sentencing-Probation Revocation
TagsStandard, Criminal, Sentencing-Probation Revocation
Appellant Hannah Christie Weyh
Respondent State of Minnesota
cite Cite Docket
Analyze
1 2 3 4 5 ... >>