• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Active Filters1
289,376 results

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA VS SHARNELL M GRANT

Docket 23CR454289-910, North Carolina State, Wake County, District Court (Nov. 8, 2023)
RHONDA G YOUNG, presiding
Case TypeCriminal
Defendant SHARNELL M GRANT
State STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Complainant A A FROST
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA VS CAPRISSA VONCHETTA HUNTER

Docket 23CR444063-910, North Carolina State, Wake County, District Court (Oct. 26, 2023)
Case TypeCriminal
Defendant CAPRISSA VONCHETTA HUNTER
State STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Complainant Herman Mungai
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

Dao Health v. Chiaro Technology Limited

Docket 2:23-cv-00289, Texas Eastern District Court (June 21, 2023)
District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, presiding, Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne
Patent
DivisionMarshall
FlagsCLOSED, JRG4, JURY, PATENT/TRADEMARK, PROTECTIVE-ORDER, STAYDDLS
Cause35:145 Patent Infringement
Case Type830 Patent
Tags830 Patent, 830 Patent
Plaintiff Dao Health
Defendant Chiaro Technology Limited
Counter Claimant Chiaro Technology Limited
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

LARRY JAMALL KINARD VS CHW GROUP INC

Docket 23CVD010135-590, North Carolina State, Mecklenburg County, District Court (June 9, 2023)
Case TypeGeneral Civil Action
Plaintiff LARRY JAMALL KINARD
Defendant CHW GROUP INC
Arbitrator/Mediator AMY COX GRUENDEL
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

Willow Innovations, Inc. v. Chiaro Technology, Ltd.

Docket 2:23-cv-00229, Texas Eastern District Court (May 24, 2023)
District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, presiding
Patent
DivisionMarshall
FlagsJRG4, JURY, MARKMANREF, PATENT/TRADEMARK, PROTECTIVE-ORDER
Cause35:271 Patent Infringement
Case Type830 Patent
Tags830 Patent, 830 Patent
Patent10398816; 10434228; 10625005; 10688229; 10722624; 11185619; 11413380, 10398816, 10434228, 10625005, 10688229, 10722624, 11185619, 11413380
Plaintiff Willow Innovations, Inc.
Defendant Chiaro Technology, Ltd.
Counter Claimant Chiaro Technology, Ltd.
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

Shenzhen Root Technology Co Ltd v. Chiaro Technology Ltd

Docket 2:23-cv-00631, Washington Western District Court (Apr. 28, 2023)
District Judge Kymberly K. Evanson, presiding
Patent
DivisionSeattle
FlagsJURYDEMAND, PROTO
Cause28:2201 Declaratory Judgment
Case Type830 Patent
Tags830 Patent, 830 Patent
Deadline# 124 and # 119 ), is HEREBY EXTENDED to 3/28/2025., Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement due 3/28/2025
DeadlineOpening Expert Disclosures for Claim Construction due 4/4/2025
Counter Defendant Shenzhen Xitao Network Technology Co Ltd
Plaintiff Shenzhen Root Technology Co Ltd
Plaintiff Hong Kong Lute Technology Co Limited
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

No. 152 SCHEDULING ORDER

Document Shenzhen Root Technology Co Ltd v. Chiaro Technology Ltd, 2:23-cv-00631, No. 152 (W.D.Wash. Mar. 12, 2025)
Scheduling Order
Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation and the Court’s prior order (Dkt. No. 151), the Court issues the following case schedule: Extended Deadline Event Preliminary Invalidity and non- infringement contentions Plaintiff’s Answer to Cross-claims Exchange of Proposed Terms and Claim elements for construction Exchange of Preliminary Claim Constructions and Extrinsic Evidence March 21, 2025 Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement Opening Expert Disclosures for Claim Construction March 7, 2025 March 21, 2025 March 14, 2025 March 28, 2025 April 4, 2025
April 18, 2025 Rebuttal Expert Disclosures for Claim Construction Completion of Claim Construction Discovery Opening Claim Construction Briefs May 16, 2025 Responsive Claim Construction Brief May 30, 2025 Claim Construction Hearing
May 9, 2025 Dated this 12th day of March, 2025.
Kymberly K. Evanson United States District Judge
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 151 ORDER granting Parties' 150 Stipulated Motion to Modify the Case Schedule

Document Shenzhen Root Technology Co Ltd v. Chiaro Technology Ltd, 2:23-cv-00631, No. 151 (W.D.Wash. Mar. 5, 2025)
The parties stipulated to a modification of the case schedule.
The Court finds good cause, and therefore GRANTS the motion to modify the case schedule.
The unexpired deadlines in the previous case schedule (Dkt. No. 149) are VACATED.
The Court will issue an amended case schedule based on the parties’ stipulation and consistent with the Court’s standard case schedule.
Kymberly K. Evanson United States District Judge
cite Cite Document
Analyze
1 2 3 4 5 ... >>