`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________________________________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________________________________________
`
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.,
`Petitioners
`
`v.
`
`NANOCO TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED,
`Patent Owner
`
`
`U.S. PATENT NO. 8,524,365
`
`Case IPR2021-00186
`
`
`PETITIONER’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE
`ADMISSION OF JEREMY WILSON
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2021-00186
`Patent No. 8,524,365
`
`Petitioners Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America,
`
`Inc. (collectively “Samsung”) hereby move under 37 C.F.R § 42.10(c) for the
`
`admission pro hac vice of Jeremy Wilson in the present inter partes review so that
`
`he may be appointed back up counsel for Samsung.
`
`I.
`
`INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND
`Authorization for this motion was provided by the PTAB in the Notice of
`
`Filing Date Accorded to Petition (Paper No. 4). Counsel for Samsung consulted
`
`with counsel for Patent Owner Nanoco Technologies, Limited (“Nanoco”), and
`
`Nanoco agreed it does not oppose the present motion for pro hac vice admission of
`
`Mr. Wilson. Therefore, the present motion is proper at this time. As explained
`
`further below, Mr. Wilson is an experienced litigating attorney with an established
`
`familiarity with the subject matter at issue in this inter partes review.
`
`“[W]here the lead counsel is a registered practitioner, a motion to appear pro
`
`hac vice by counsel who is not a registered practitioner may be granted upon
`
`showing that counsel is an experienced litigating attorney and has an established
`
`familiarity with the subject matter at issue in the proceeding.” 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c).
`
`A motion for pro hac vice admission must:
`
`a.
`
`b.
`
`Contain a statement of facts showing there is good cause for the Board
`to recognize counsel pro hac vice during the proceeding.
`Be accompanied by an affidavit or declaration of the individual seeking
`to appear attesting to the following:
`
`1
`
`
`
`IPR2021-00186
`Patent No. 8,524,365
`
`i. Membership in good standing of the Bar of at least one State or the
`District of Columbia;
`ii. No suspensions or disbarments from practice before any court or
`administrative body;
`iii. No application for admission to practice before any court or
`administrative body ever denied;
`iv. No sanctions or contempt citations imposed by any court or
`administrative body;
`v. The individual seeking to appear has read and will comply with the
`Office Patent Trial Practice Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice
`for Trials set forth in part 42 of 37 C.F.R.;
`vi. The individual will be subject to the USPTO Rules of Professional
`Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et. seq. and disciplinary
`jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a);
`vii. All other proceedings before the Office for which the individual has
`applied to appear pro hac vice in the last three (3) years; and
`viii. Familiarity with the subject matter at issue in the proceeding.
`Unified Patents, Inc. v. Parallel Iron, LLC, Case IPR2013-00639, 2013 WL
`
`8700556 (PTAB Oct. 15, 2013).
`
`II.
`
`STATEMENT OF FACTS SHOWING GOOD CAUSE FOR THE
`PRESENT MOTION
`Samsung’s lead counsel is a registered practitioner. (Paper No. 1 at 71.)
`
`Mr. Wilson is a member in good standing of the State Bar of New York, is
`
`admitted to practice before the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New
`
`York, and has practiced patent litigation since 2011. Wilson Decl. at ¶ 2. Mr. Wilson
`
`litigates patent cases before various federal courts and the United States International
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2021-00186
`Patent No. 8,524,365
`
`Trade Commission. Wilson Decl. at ¶ 3. Through his years of practice, Mr. Wilson
`
`has gained substantial experience in trials, discovery, Markman hearings, and
`
`appeals. Id. Mr. Wilson also has appeared before the Office pro hac vice before,
`
`including in IPR2015-01065 and IPR2019-01148, and is familiar with IPR
`
`proceedings. Wilson Decl. at ¶ 4.
`
`Mr. Wilson has never been suspended or disbarred from practice before any
`
`court or administrative body. Wilson Decl. at ¶ 5.
`
`Mr. Wilson has never had any applications for admission to practice before
`
`any court or administrative body denied. Wilson Decl. at ¶ 6.
`
`Mr. Wilson has never had sanctions or contempt citations imposed by any
`
`court or administrative body. Wilson Decl. at ¶ 7.
`
`Mr. Wilson has read and will comply with the Official Patent Trial Practice
`
`Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for trials set forth in part 42 of 37 C.F.R.
`
`Wilson Decl. at ¶ 8.
`
`Mr. Wilson will be subject to USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct set forth
`
`in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et. seq. and disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R.
`
`§11.19(a). Wilson Decl. at ¶ 9.
`
`In the past three years, Mr. Wilson has applied for pro hac vice admission
`
`before the Office in IPR2019-01148, and his application was granted. Wilson Decl.
`
`at ¶ 4.
`
`3
`
`
`
`IPR2021-00186
`Patent No. 8,524,365
`
`Mr. Wilson is very familiar with the subject matter at issue in this inter partes
`
`review. Wilson Decl. at ¶ 10. Mr. Wilson is counsel to Samsung, and has been
`
`providing legal advice to Samsung in connection with the related district court
`
`litigation between the parties to this IPR involving the same patent at issue in this
`
`proceeding, U.S. Patent No. 8,524,365 (“the ’365 Patent”). Id. During this
`
`representation, Mr. Wilson was substantively involved in developing and refining
`
`Samsung’s invalidity and non-infringement positions. Id. Mr. Wilson has also
`
`specifically reviewed the papers and evidence filed by the parties in this IPR, as well
`
`as the orders of the Board. Id. Therefore, Mr. Wilson, as a result of his
`
`representation of Samsung, is uniquely positioned to represent Samsung in this IPR.
`
`III. CONCLUSION
`For all the foregoing reasons, there is good cause to admit Mr. Wilson on a
`
`pro hac vice basis to serve as back up counsel for Samsung. Therefore, Samsung
`
`respectfully requests that this Unopposed Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission of
`
`Jeremy Wilson be granted.
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`DATED: July 19, 2021
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2021-00186
`Patent No. 8,524,365
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ F. Christopher Mizzo, P.C.
`F. Christopher Mizzo, P.C. (No. 73,156)
`W. Todd Baker (No. 45,265)
`KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
`1301 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20004
`P: 202.389.5000; F: 202.389.5200
`chris.mizzo@kirkland.com
`todd.baker@kirkland.com
`
`Gregory S. Arovas, P.C. (No. 38,818)
`Stefan Miller (No. 57,623)
`KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
`601 Lexington Avenue
`New York, NY 10022
`P: 212.446.4800; F: 212.446.4900
`greg.arovas@kirkland.com
`stefan.miller@kirkland.com
`
`Attorneys for Petitioners
`Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and
`Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
`
`5
`
`
`
`Exhibit No.
`1001
`1002
`
`1003
`1004
`1005
`
`1006
`
`1007
`
`1008
`
`1009
`
`1010
`
`1011
`1012
`
`1013
`1014
`1015
`1016
`
`IPR2021-00186
`Patent No. 8,524,365
`
`
`LIST OF EXHIBITS
`Description
`U.S. Patent No. 8,524,365 (“the ’365 patent”)
`Declaration of Mark A. Green in Support of Petition for Inter
`Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 8,524,365
`Curriculum Vitae for Mark A. Green
`Prosecution History of U.S. Patent No. 8,524,365
`International Patent Publication No. WO 03/097904 to Banin et
`al. (“Banin”)
`A. Zaban et al., Photosensitization of Nanoporous TiO2
`Electrodes with InP Quantum Dots, 14 LANGMUIR 3153 (1998)
`(“Zaban”)
`Olga I. Mićić et al., Synthesis and Characterization of InP
`Quantum Dots, 98 J. PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY 4966 (1994) (“Mićić”)
`V. Ptatschek et al., Quantized Aggregation Phenomena in II–VI-
`Semiconductor Colloids, 102 BERICHTE DER BUNSEN–
`GESELLSCHAFT FÜR PHYSIKALISCHE CHEMIE 85 (1998)
`(“Ptatschek”)
`W. E. Farneth et al., Bulk Semiconductors from Molecular Solids:
`A Mechanistic Investigation, 4 CHEMISTRY OF MATERIALS 916
`(1992) (“Farneth”)
`Heng Yu et al., Heterogeneous Seeded Growth: A Potentially
`General Synthesis of Monodisperse Metallic Nanoparticles, 123 J.
`AM. CHEMICAL SOC’Y 9198 (2001) (“Yu”)
`U.S. Patent No. 7,193,098 to Lucey et al. (“Lucey”)
`S.P. Ahrenkiel et al., Synthesis and Characterization of Colloidal
`InP Quantum Rods, 3 NANO LETTERS 833 (2003) (“Ahrenkiel”)
`INTENTIONALLY OMITTED
`INTENTIONALLY OMITTED
`U.S. Patent No. 6,815,064 to Treadway et al. (“Treadway”)
`N. Herron et al., Crystal Structure and Optical Properties of
`Cd32S14(SC6H5)36·DMF4, a Cluster with a 15 Angstrom CdS
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit No.
`
`1017
`
`1018
`
`1019
`
`1020
`
`1021
`
`1022
`
`1023
`1024
`1025
`1026
`1027
`1028
`1029
`1030
`1031
`1032
`1033
`1034
`1035
`
`1036
`
`IPR2021-00186
`Patent No. 8,524,365
`
`
`Description
`Core, 259 SCIENCE 1426 (1993) (“Herron”)
`Seven Networks, LLC v. Apple Inc., C.A. No. 2:19-cv-00115-JRG,
`Dkt. 313 (Sept. 22, 2020)
`Docket Control Order, Nanoco Technologies Ltd. v. Samsung
`Electronics Co., Ltd., No. 2:20-cv-00038 (E.D. Tex.)
`October 2021 Calendar for Judge Rodney Gilstrap, Eastern
`District of Texas
`Return of summons to Samsung Electronics Co. and Samsung
`Electronics America, Nanoco Technologies Ltd. v. Samsung
`Electronics Co., Ltd., No. 2:20-cv-00038 (E.D. Tex.)
`Letter dated November 9, 2020 from M. Pearson to M. Newman
`re stipulation about invalidity grounds
`Infringement contentions, Nanoco Technologies Ltd. v. Samsung
`Electronics Co., Ltd., No. 2:20-cv-00038 (E.D. Tex.)
`Cover material for Zaban
`Cover material for Mićić
`INTENTIONALLY OMITTED
`Cover material for Farneth
`Cover material for Yu
`Cover material for Ahrenkiel
`INTENTIONALLY OMITTED
`Cover material for Herron
`Declaration of Chris Lowden
`Declaration of David Smorodin
`INTENTIONALLY OMITTED
`Declaration of Rachel Watters
`Catherine J. Murphy, Optical Sensing with Quantum Dots, 74
`ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY 520A (2002)
`U.S. Patent App. No. 2003/0106488 to Huang et al.
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit No.
`1037
`
`1038
`
`1039
`
`1040
`1041
`
`1042
`1043
`1044
`
`1045
`
`1046
`
`1047
`
`1048
`
`1049
`
`1050
`
`IPR2021-00186
`Patent No. 8,524,365
`
`
`Description
`NANOPARTICLES: FROM THEORY TO APPLICATION (Günter Schmid
`ed., March 2004)
`Victor I. Klimov, Nanocrystal Quantum Dots, 28 LOS ALAMOS
`SCI. 214 (2003)
`David J. Norris, Electronic Structure in Semiconductor
`Nanocrystals, in SEMICONDUCTOR AND METAL NANOCRYSTALS 65
`(Victor I. Klimov ed., 2003)
`U.S. Patent App. Pub. No. 2004/0036130 to Lee et al. (“Lee”)
`Andy Watson et al., Lighting Up Cells with Quantum Dots, 34
`BIOTECHNIQUES 296 (2003)
`INTENTIONALLY OMITTED
`INTENTIONALLY OMITTED
`Victor K. LaMer et al., Theory, Production and Mechanism of
`Formation of Monodispersed Hydrosols, 72 J. AM. CHEMICAL
`SOC’Y 4847 (1950)
`Scott L. Cumberland et al., Inorganic Clusters as Single-Source
`Precursors for Preparation of CdSe, ZnSe, and CdSe/ZnS
`Nanomaterials, 14 CHEMISTRY OF MATERIALS 1576 (2002)
`C. B. Murray et al., Synthesis and Characterization of Nearly
`Monodisperse CdE (E = S, Se, Te) Semiconductor
`Nanocrystallites, 115 J. AM. CHEMICAL SOC’Y 8706 (1993)
`David Battaglia et al., Formation of High Quality InP and InAs
`Nanocrystals in a Noncoordinating Solvent, 2 NANO LETTERS
`1027 (2002)
`Tobias Hanrath et al., Nucleation and Growth of Germanium
`Nanowires Seeded by Organic Monolayer-Coated Gold
`Nanocrystals, 124 J. AM. CHEMICAL SOC’Y 1424 (2002)
`Jennifer A. Hollingsworth et al., “Soft” Chemical Synthesis and
`Manipulation of Semiconductor Nanocrystals, in
`SEMICONDUCTOR AND METAL NANOCRYSTALS 1 (Victor I. Klimov
`ed., 2003)
`Nigel L. Pickett et al., Syntheses of Semiconductor Nanoparticles
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit No.
`
`1051
`1052
`1053
`1054
`1055
`1056
`
`1057
`
`1058
`
`1059
`
`1060
`
`1061
`
`1062
`1063
`1064
`1065
`1066
`
`IPR2021-00186
`Patent No. 8,524,365
`
`
`Description
`Using Single-Molecular Precursors, 1 CHEMICAL REC. 467 (2001)
`INTENTIONALLY OMITTED
`INTENTIONALLY OMITTED
`U.S. Patent No. 7,056,471 to Han et al.
`U.S. Patent No. 7,588,828
`INTENTIONALLY OMITTED
`Olga I. Mićić et al., Core–Shell Quantum Dots of Lattice-Matched
`ZnCdSe2 Shells on InP Cores: Experiment and Theory, 104 J. OF
`PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B 12149 (2000)
`Michael L. Steigerwald, Clusters as Small Solids, 13
`POLYHEDRON 1245 (1994)
`M.L. Steigerwald et al., Application of Phosphine Tellurides to
`the Preparation of Group II-VI (2-16) Semiconductor Materials, 7
`ORGANOMETALLICS 245 (1988)
`Uri Banin et al., Tunneling and Optical Spectroscopy of
`Semiconductor Nanocrystal Quantum Dots: Single-Particle and
`Ensemble Properties, in SEMICONDUCTOR AND METAL
`NANOCRYSTALS 327 (Victor I. Klimov ed., 2003)
`Arthur J. Nozik, et al., III-V Quantum Dots and Quantum Dot
`Arrays: Synthesis, Optical Properties, Photogenerated Carrier
`Dynamics, and Applications to Photon Conversion, in
`SEMICONDUCTOR AND METAL NANOCRYSTALS 327 (Victor I.
`Klimov ed., 2003)
`Yong Han et al., Synthesis and Characterization of Zinc
`Sulfide/Gallium Phosphide Nanocomposite Powders, 77 J. AM.
`CERAMICS SOC’Y 3153 (1994)
`INTENTIONALLY OMITTED
`INTENTIONALLY OMITTED
`U.S. Patent No. 6,864,626 to Weiss et al. (“Weiss”)
`U.S. Patent No. 7,147,712 to Zehnder et al. (“Zehnder ’712”)
`M. A. Olshavsky, Organometallic Synthesis of GaAs Crystallites
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2021-00186
`Patent No. 8,524,365
`
`
`Description
`Exhibiting Quantum Confinement, 112 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. 9438
`(1990)
`A. R. Kortan et al, Nucleation and Growth of CdSe on ZnS
`Quantum Crystallite Seeds, and Vice Versa, in Inverse Micelle
`Media, 112 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. 1327 (1990)
`Holger Borchert et al., Investigation of ZnS Passivated InP
`Nanocrystals by XPS, 2 NANO LETTERS 151 (2002)
`Gregory A. Khitrov, Synthesis, Characterization and Formation
`Mechanisms of Inorganic Nanomaterials, University of California
`Santa Barbara (1993)
`Frederic V. Mikulec, Organometallic Synthesis and Spectroscopic
`Characterization of Manganese-Doped CdSe Nanocrystals, 122 J.
`AM. CHEM. SOC. 2532 (2000)
`Stephan Haubold, Strongly Luminescent InP/ZnS Core-Shell
`Nanoparticles, 2 CHEMPHYSCHEM 331 (2001)
`Huheey et al., INORGANIC CHEMISTRY: PRINCIPLES OF STRUCTURE
`AND REACTIVITY (4th ed. 1993)
`Linus Pauling, GENERAL CHEMISTRY (3d ed. revised 1988)
`Richard L. Wells et al., Tris(trimethylsilyl)arsine and Lithium
`Bis(trimethylsilyl)arsenide, 31 INORGANIC SYNTHESES 150 (Alan
`H. Cowley ed., 1997)
`INTENTIONALLY OMITTED
`March 2, 2021 Letter M. Pearson to M. Newman
`May 11, 2021 Claim Construction Order from Nanoco
`Technologies Ltd. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., No. 2:20-cv-
`00038 (E.D. Tex.)
`Declaration of Jeremy Wilson in Support of Petitioners’
`Unopposed Motion for Pro Hac Vice
`
`Exhibit No.
`
`1067
`
`1068
`
`1069
`
`1070
`
`1071
`
`1072
`
`1073
`1074
`
`1075-1089
`1090
`1091
`
`1092
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`The undersigned certifies that the above-captioned “PETITIONER’S
`
`IPR2021-00186
`Patent No. 8,524,365
`
`
`UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION OF JEREMY
`
`WILSON” and accompanying Exhibit 1092 were served in their entirety on July 19,
`
`2021, via electronic service on lead and back-up counsel:
`
`WAMeunier@mintz.com
`
`PJCuomo@mintz.com
`
`MCNewman@mintz.com
`
`TWintner@mintz.com
`
`MSGalica@mintz.com
`
`NanocoIPRs@mintz.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ F. Christopher Mizzo, P.C.
`F. Christopher Mizzo, P.C.
`
`
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
