throbber
US005319112A
`United States Patent 19
`5,319,112
`[11] Patent Number:
`
`[45] Date of Patent: Jun. 7, 1994
`Kingston et al.
`
`AUNAAA
`
`(54 METHOD FOR THE CONVERSION OF
`CEPHALOMANNINE TO TAXOL AND FOR
`THE PREPARATION OF N-ACYL ANALOGS
`OF TAXOL
`
`[75]
`
`Inventors: David G. I. Kingston, Blacksburg;
`Anthony A. Molinero,
`Christiansburg, both of Va.
`
`(73] Assignee:
`
`Virgnia Tech Intellectual Properties,
`Inc., Blacksburg, Va.
`
`[21] Appl. No.: 931,319
`
`[22] Filed:
`Aug. 18, 1992
`[51]
`Tint, C05 ooocccsesssssesssssessscssesssssssssesseee C07D 305/14
`[52] U.S. CU. ceccssssseseesssssccsssenssaseseseee 549/510; 549/511
`[58] Field of Search ......ccsssssssssssssesssseeee 549/510, 511
`
`[56]
`
`References Cited
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`......cess 349/510
`6/1980 Miller et al.
`4,206,221
`3/1989 Colin etal. ......
`sees
`.- 549/510
`4,814,470
`8/1989 Colin etal.......
`w+ 549/510
`4,857,653
`5/1990 Colin et al.
`.» 549/510
`4,924,012
`
`5/1991 Holton......
`.. 549/510
`5,015,744
`
`5,059,699 10/1991 Kingston et
`....ssesseree 549/510
`al.
`
`FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`0400971 12/1990 European Pat. Off.
`
`.
`
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`
`Kingston et al., “The Chemistry of Taxol, A Clinically
`Useful, Anti-Cancer Agent”, J. Nat. Prod., 53, 1-12
`(1990).
`Deutschet al., “Synthesis of Congeners and Prodrugs3.
`Water-Soluble Prodrugs of Taxol With Potent Antitu-
`mor Activity”, J. Med. Chem., 32,788-792 (1989).
`Mangatalet al., “Application of the Vicinal Oxyamina-
`tion Reaction with Asymmetric Induction to the Hemi-
`synthesis of Taxol and Analogues”, Tetrahedron, 45,
`4177-4190 (1989).
`Deniset al., “A Highly Efficient, Practical Approach to
`Natural Taxol’, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 110, 5917-5919
`(1988).
`Magri et al., J. Org. Chem., 51, 30-39, (1986).
`Mathewetal., ‘Synthesis and Evaluation of Some Wa-
`ter-Soluble Prodrugs and Derivatives of Taxol with
`Tease
`
`Antitumor Activity”, J. Med. Chem., 35, 145-151
`(1992).
`Swindell et al., “Biologically Active Taxol Analogs
`With Deleted A-Ring Side-Chain Substituents and
`Variable C-2' Configurations”, J. Med. Chem., 34,
`1176-1184 (1991).
`Powell et al., “Cephalomannine; A New Antitumor
`Alkaloid for Cephalotaxus manni?’, Chem. Comm.,
`102-104 (1979).
`McGuireet al., “Taxol: A Unique Antineoplastic Agent
`with Significant Activity in Advanced Ovarian Epithe-
`lial Neoplasms”, Ann. Int. Med., 111, 273-279 (1989).
`Holmeset al., “Phase II Trial of Taxol, an Active Drug
`in the Treatment of Metastatic Breast Cancer”, J. Nat.
`Can. Inst., 24, 1791-1805 (1991).
`Rowinskyet al., “Taxol: Twenty Years Later, the Story
`Unfolds”, J. Nat. Can. Inst., 24, 1778-1781 (1991).
`Gueritte-Voegelein et
`al.,
`“Chemical Studies of
`10-Deacety! Baccatin III. Hemisynthesis of Taxol De-
`rivatives”, Tetrahedron, 42, 4451-4460 (1986).
`Kingston, “The Chemistry of Taxol”, Pharmac. Ther.,
`52, 1-34 (1991).
`(List continued on next page.)
`
`Primary Examiner—C. Warren Ivy
`Assistant Examiner—Ba K. Trinh
`Attorney, Agent, or Firm—Mason, Fenwick & Lawrence
`
`ABSTRACT
`[57]
`The natural product cephalomannine can be converted
`to the important anticancer natural product taxol by a
`simple process involving the steps of hydrogenation,
`benzoylation at the C-2'-position, protection of the C-7
`position, and reaction with oxaly! chloride, followed by
`reaction with diphenylcarbodiimide and deprotection.
`The same process can be applied to mixtures of taxol
`and cephalomannine, thus obviating the need for the
`separation of these closely related compounds. In addi-
`tion, the selection of an acylating reagent other than the
`benzoyl group allows the preparation of taxol analogs
`with other N-acyl] substituents.
`
`12 Claims, 6 Drawing Sheets
`
`Sanofi Exh. 2004
`Neptunev. Aventis
`IPR2019-00136
`
`Sanofi Exh. 2004
`Neptune v. Aventis
`IPR2019-00136
`
`

`

`5,319,112
`
`Page 2
`
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`
`Ringel et al., “Studies with RP 56976 (Taxotere): A
`Semisynthetic Analogue of Taxol”, J. Nat. Can., Inst.,
`4, 288-291 (1991).
`Gueritte-Voegelein et al., “Relationships Between the
`Structure of Taxol Analogues and Their Antimitotic
`Activity”, J. Med. Chem., 34, 992-998 (1991).
`
`Miller et al., “Antileukemic Alkaloids from Taxus Wal-
`lichiana Zucc.”, J. Org. Chem., 46, 1469-1474 (1981).
`Shiozaki et al., “Cleavage and Some Modifications of
`the 7-Amide Group of the Cephamycins”, Tetrahe-
`dron, 36, 2735-2740 (1980).
`Shiozaki et al., “A New Method for Cleavage 7-Amide
`Group of Cephalosporins”, Tetrahedron Lett., 46,
`4059-4062 (1977).
`
`

`

`wv
`
`
`Oumainin
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Orisscsssesens
`Orscescreaeens
`
`yuajed“SN
`
`¥66r*Leunr
`
`930[32048
`
`TLL6TE'S
`
`

`

`yuajeg“SN
`
`P66T“Lounr
`
`9J07045
`
`ZTIT6LE'S
`
` i
`
`+ CICCH,OCCI
`
`|ODor
`
`
`Qrarrseneaney
`Drevasarecoaes
`Curenracescess
`
`
`
`
`

`

` Siresanaaseate
`
`
`Sresensenecany
`
`
`
`Crveaessaacene
`
`
`

`
`atw
`

`
`yuazed"SN
`
`P66L“LZeunr
`
`9JO€19948
`
`TIL6LE'S
`
`

`

`srsnneasen©)
`
`Mixture 7
`
`
`
`
`
`U.S.PatentJune7,1994Sheet4of65,319,112
`
`
`
`

`

`yuajed‘S'N
`
`P66r‘Leune
`
`9JO¢39045
`
`ZIT‘6LE'S
`
`
`
` Dreareseeres
`~
`
`
`
`Cursatecaneses
`
`12
`
`
`
`4
`
`=
`
`
`
`(oTty
`
`a
`
`

`

`Cc
`
`CHO
`
`
`
`
`
`U.S.PatentJune7,1994Sheet6of65,319,112
`
`
`

`

`1
`
`5,319,112
`
`METHOD FOR THE CONVERSION OF
`
`CEPHALOMANNINE TO TAXOL AND FOR THE
`
`PREPARATION OF N-ACYL ANALOGS OF TAXOL
`
`FIELD OF THE INVENTION
`
`The present invention relates to taxol, taxol conge-
`ners, taxol analogues, and methods for making same.
`The invention relates more particularly to the synthesis
`of taxol or taxol congeners from natural products hav-
`ing portions of the taxol structure.
`
`BACKGROUNDOF THE INVENTION
`
`Taxol is a naturally occurring diterpenoid which has
`
`demonstrated great potential as an anti-cancer drug.
`Taxol, shown below as compound1, can be isolated
`from the bark of the western yew, Taxus brevifolia, and
`is also found in several other yew species such as 7.
`baccata and T. cuspidata. For further information re-
`garding taxol,
`see Kingston et al., U.S. Pat. No.
`5,059,699. Ail patents, articles, and other documents
`cited herein are incorporated by reference as if repro-
`duced in ful! below.
`
`
`
`15
`
`25
`
`30
`
`Since taxol is very scarce, a procedure to make taxol
`from cephalomannine would prove valuable becauseit
`would increase the supply of taxol, while also avoiding
`the need to separate cephalomannine from taxol.
`No previous work on a direct conversion of cephalo-
`mannineto taxol has been reported. An indirect route is
`available through the work of Magri et al., in Journal of
`Organic Chemistry, Vol. 51, p. 3239, 1986, who reported
`that taxol can be converted to baccatin JII, shown
`below as compound 3, by treatment with tetrabutylam-
`monium borohydride in dichloromethane. It has been
`surprisingly discovered that this process works equally
`well with cephalomannine, so a pathway exists to pre-
`pare baccatin III 3 from cephalomannine.
`
`
`
`oO
`
` HO
`
`=
`:
`OH : =. 0
`Oo
`i
`x
`
`ZO
`
`. CH
`ql
`Oo
`
`Taxol almost always co-occurs with the closely re-
`lated compound cephalomannine, shown below as com-
`pound 2. Due to their close structural similarity, the
`separation of taxol from cephalomannineis a very diffi-
`‘cult one. See Waniet al., “Plant Antitumor Agents. VI.
`The Isolation and Structure of Taxol, A Novel Antileu-
`kemic and Antitumor Agent from Taxus brevifolia,” J.
`Am. Chem. Soc. 93, 2325(1971); Powell et al., “Cephalo-
`mannine; A New Antitumor Alkaloid from Ceph-
`alotaxus mannii,” J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun.
`
`102(1979); Miller et al., ‘““Antileukemic Alkaloids from
`Taxus wallichiana Zucc,” J. Org. Chem. 46, 1469(1981).
`
`50
`
`55
`
`65
`
`Baccatin III 3 can be converted to taxol by one of
`several published pathways. See Hoiton, R., “Method
`for Preparation of Taxol Using an Oxazinone,” U.S.
`Pat. No. 5,015,744; Denis et al., “Highly Efficient Prac-
`tical Approach to Natural Taxol,” J. Am. Chem. Soc.
`110, 5917(1988); Mangatal et al., “Application of the
`Vicinal Oxyamination Reaction with Asymmetric In-
`duction to the Hemisynthesis of Taxol and Analogues,”
`Tetrahedron 45, 4177(1989).
`Hence, cephalomannine can be converted to taxol
`through baccatin II 3, by treatment of cephalomannine
`with, by way of non-limiting example, tetrabutylam-
`monium borohydride in the presence of dichlorometh-
`ane. However,this process requires the synthesis of the
`B-phenylisoserine side-chain of taxol
`in enantiomeri-
`cally pure form, and the coupling of the side-chain to
`baccatin III 3 does not proceed quantitatively.
`Because of the promising clinical activity of taxol
`against various types of cancer, the preparation of ana-
`logues of taxol is an important endeavor, especially in
`
`

`

`3
`view of the previously mentioned limited supply of
`taxol. See McGuire et al., “Taxol: A Unique Antineo-
`plastic Agent with Significant Activity in Advanced
`Ovarian Epithelial Neoplasms,” Ann. Intern. Med. 111:
`273-279 (1989); Holmesetal., “Phase II Trials of Taxol,
`an Active Drug in the Treatment of Metastatic Breast
`Cancer,” J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 83: 1797-1805 (1991).
`It is believed that the preparation of taxol analogues
`will result in the synthesis of compounds with compara-
`ble or greater potency than taxol (thus reducing the
`need for the drug), superior bioavailability, or having
`less undesirable side effects. Indeed, the synthesis of the
`taxol analogue taxotere, which differs from taxol only in
`the nature of the N-acy] substituent and the absence of
`the 10-acetyl group,
`indicates the usefulness of this
`approach, since taxotere is reported to be approxi-
`mately twice as active as taxol in someassays (although
`taxol is believed to be moreeffective in other systems
`than taxotere). See Guéritte-Voegelein et al., “Chemical
`Studies of 10-Deacetylbaccatin III. Hemisynthesis of
`Taxol Derivatives,” Tetrahedron 42: 4451-4460 (1986);
`Ringel et al., “Studies with R P56976 (Taxotere) A
`Semisynthetic Analogue of Taxol,” J. Natl Cancer Inst.
`83:288-291 (1991).
`A large number of taxol analogs have antitumor
`properties as shownbytheir ability to inhibit the disas-
`sembly of microtubules. See “Relationships between the
`Structure of Taxol Analogues and Their Antimitotic
`Activity,” Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, Vol. 34, pp.
`992-998 (1991); “Biologically Active Taxol Analogues
`with Deleted A-Ring Side Chain Substituents and Vari-
`able C-2' Configurations,” Journal ofMedicinal Chemis-
`try, Vol. 34, pp. 1176-1184, (1991); “Synthesis and Eval-
`uation of Some Water-Soluble Prodrugs and Deriva-
`tives of Taxol with Antitumor Activity,” Journal of 35
`Medicinal Chemistry, Vol. 35, pp. 145-151, (1992). The
`foregoing articles demonstrate the effectiveness of taxol
`analogs as antitumor agents.
`There is also a need for a method to quickly deter-
`mine the biological activities of new compounds or
`pharmaceutical compounds having bioactivities or
`structures similar to taxol. The short supply and expense
`of taxol makes impractical the use of taxol as a standard
`in determining the bioactivities of other compounds;
`thus, it is highly desirable that a range of other stan-
`dards with known biological activities be available to
`determine the bioactivity of taxol derivatives and other
`compoundsrelative to taxol. Useful standards should be
`derivatives of taxol, or the standards should be com-
`pounds which have similar structures to taxol, but
`which are more readily available or which can be syn-
`thesized easier than taxol. At present, some derivatives,
`which do not exhibit the same high biological activity
`as taxol, are thrown away; this waste would be elimi-
`nated by a method which usestaxol derivatives, which
`havesignificantly less biological activity than taxol, as
`standards in bioactivity testing, rather than utilizing
`more taxol, which is already in short supply and very
`expensive. Further, it is critical in the commercial ex-
`ploitation of taxol and taxol congeners that the efficacy
`of taxol and taxol congeners designated for commercial
`sale be subjected to rigid quality standards. It is un-
`desireable to use taxol in quality testing due to its short
`supply, and therefore, it is desirable to develop quality
`or activity screening protocols whichutilize taxol ana-
`logs.
`Thus, there is a need for taxol derivatives having a
`range of in vivo and in vitro activities, and there is a
`
`4
`need for taxol derivatives or compoundshaving similar
`biological activities to taxol. There is a corresponding
`need for methods to prepare taxol derivatives and taxol
`congeners.
`There is also a need to prepare taxol from naturally
`occurring mixtures, and more particularly, there is a
`need to convert cephalomannine, or mixtures compris-
`ing cephalomannine, to taxol.
`There is also need for better methods of treating
`cancer, and moreparticularly of treating cancer with
`taxol analogs.
`OBJECTS OF THE INVENTION
`
`Therefore, it is a primary object of the present inven-
`tion to convert cephalomannine, or a mixture compris-
`ing cephalomannine, to taxol.
`It is another object of the present invention to pre-
`pare analogsoftaxol.
`It is a further object of this invention to develop a
`new method for preparing taxol and taxol congeners.
`It is yet another object of the present invention to
`prepare intermediates that can be directly converted to
`taxol or taxol congeners.
`It is a further object of the present invention to use
`taxol analogs to treat cancer.
`It is a still further object of this invention to produce
`taxol from a naturally occurring mixture.
`It is yet another object of the present invention to
`develop taxol analogs suitable for use in commercial
`quality control and screening of taxol and analogs of
`taxol.
`
`SUMMARYOF THE INVENTION
`
`These and other objects are achieved by the present
`invention as more fully described herein by reference to
`preferred non-limiting embodiments. In a first embodi-
`ment, a mixture of cephalomannine 2 and taxol
`1
`is
`converted to taxol
`1 by substituting the 2-methyl-2-
`butenoyl moiety on the C-13 side chain of cephaloman-
`nine with a benzoyl group; more specifically, a pre-
`ferred process comprises the steps of (1) hydrogenation,
`(2) benzoylation, (3) protection of the C-7 hydroxyl
`groupas its trichloroethyloxycarbony] (‘‘troc”) or other
`protecting group (4) reaction with oxalyl chloride fol-
`lowedby addition of water, (5) reaction with diphenyl-
`carbodiimide, and (6) removal of the protective group
`by reduction withzinc and acetic acid (troc) or hydro-
`lysis (TES). In a second embodiment, pure cephaloman-
`nine is converted to pure taxol by the same reaction
`sequence.
`In a third embodiment, either taxol, taxol congeners,
`or cephalomannine can be converted to an N-debenz-
`oyl-N-(alkyloxalate) analog or an N-debenzoyl-N-(N’-
`alkyloxamido) analog or the corresponding aryl analogs
`by the sequence of(1) hydrogenation (if necessary), (2)
`protection of the C-2’ and C-7 hydroxyl groupsas their
`2,2,2-trichloroethyloxycarbonyl (“‘troc”’) or other pro-
`tecting group derivative, and (3) reaction with oxalyl
`chloride followed by the addition of an appropriate
`alcohol or amine. The protective groups can be subse-
`quently removed.
`In a fourth embodiment, either taxol, taxol congeners
`or hydrogenated cephalomannine can be converted to
`any desired N-acyl analog by the sequence of(1) acyla-
`tion with a desired acylation reagent, (2) protection of
`the C-7 hydroxyl group as its 2,2,2-trichloroethylox-
`ycarbonyl (“troc’”’) or other protecting group deriva-
`tive, (3) reaction with oxaly] chloride followed by addi-
`
`5,319,112
`
`20
`
`25
`
`40
`
`45
`
`30
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`

`

`5
`tion of water, (4) reaction with diphenylcarbodiimide,
`during which the acyl group at C-2' migrates to the
`amino group at the 3’ position, and (5) removal of the
`protective group at C-7.
`In a sixth embodiment an intermediate, useful for its
`ability to be directly converted to taxol or taxol conge-
`ners, can be prepared from taxol, taxol congeners or
`hydrogenated cephalomannine by the sequence of(1)
`acylation, (2) protection of the C-7 hydroxyl group as
`its troc or other protecting group derivative, and (3)
`reaction with oxalyl chloride.
`In a seventh embodiment, anti-neoplastic, N-oxalyl-
`containing taxol derivatives are prepared.
`DEFINITIONS
`
`The terms used herein have the meanings as conven-
`tionally used in the chemical arts, unless the meaning is
`clearly indicated to be otherwise either by context or by
`specific language of the present disclosure. Definitions
`incorporate those used in standard texts, such as but not
`limited to Grant & Hackh’s Chemical Dictionary, Sth
`edition, McGraw-Hill, 1987.
`Taxol analogs are broadiy defined herein as those
`analogs having the basic structure of taxol (see 1),
`which are substituted at the C-2, C-4, C-7, C-10, C-2',
`and C-3’ positions by substituents which may include,
`but are not limited to H, hydroxy, alkoxy, amido, and
`ester (RCO?) wherein R is hydrogen,an alkali metal, an
`alkyl, an alkenyl, an alkynyl, an aminio, or an aryl.
`In the present invention the term iminio ion refers to
`the moiety:
`
`wherein Z is a counterion, preferably but not limited to
`cl-.
`The term alkyl refers to straight-chain or branched
`hydrocarbons which when incorporated into taxol
`compounds do not substantially destroy the properties
`of chemical stability, water solubility and biological
`activity; and in some preferable embodiments alkyl
`refers to the lower alkyls containing from oneto six
`carbon atomsin the principal chain and up to 10 carbon
`atoms; the lower alkyls may be straight or branched
`chain and include methy], ethyl, propyl, isopropyl, bu-
`tyl, isobutyl, tert-butyl, and the like.
`The term alkyi also refers to the substituted alkyl
`groups which do not substantially destroy the proper-
`ties of water solubility, chemical stability and biological
`activity including, but not limited to, the alkyl groups
`discussed above which have substituents such as halo,
`e.g., chloro, bromo;nitro; sulfate; sulfonyloxy; carboxy;
`carboxylate, e.g., —COO-—; phosphate, e.g., —OP(O)-
`(OH)2, —OP(OMKOR)}OH), —OP(O)2(OH)—, and the
`like; carbo-lower-alkoxy, e.g., carbomethoxy, carbe-
`thoxy; amino; mono- and di-loweralkylamino,e.g., me-
`thylamino, dimethylamino, carboxamide; sulfonamide;
`diethylamino, methylethylamino;
`amide;
`alkylsilyl,
`siloxy,
`lower-alkoxy, e.g., methoxy, ethoxy;
`lower-
`alkanoyloxy, e.g., acetoxy; alkenyl, alkynyl; aryl; ary]-
`oxy; and combinations of these, e.g., alkylbenzenesul-
`fonates.
`
`5,319,112
`
`6
`The term aryl refers to aryls with the same substitu-
`ents discussed above for the substituted alkyls and also
`includes, but is not limited to, lower alkyl, e.g. methyl,
`ethyl, butyl, etc., provided the substituents do not sub-
`stantially destroy the properties of chemical stability,
`water solubility, and biological activity.
`
`DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
`
`FIG.1 illustrates steps in a preferred embodiment of
`the present invention involving the conversion of ceph-
`alomannine to taxol wherein a mixture of cephaloman-
`nine and taxol is hydrogenated and the hydroxyl group
`at the C-2’ position is benzoylated.
`FIG.2 illustrates a further step in the conversion of
`cephalomannine to taxol wherein the hydroxy] groupat
`the C-7 position is protected by the reaction with 2,2,2-
`trichloroethyloxycarbonyl chloride.
`FIG.3 illustrates a further step in the conversion of
`cephalomannine to taxol wherein an iminio salt
`is
`formed by the addition of oxalyl chloride.
`FIG.4 illustrates a further step in the conversion of
`cephalomannine to taxol wherein an oxamic acid deriv-
`ative is formed by the addition of water.
`FIG.5 illustrates a further step in the conversion of
`cephalomannine to taxol wherein. reaction of the ox-
`amic acid derivative with diphenylcarbodiimide, fol-
`lowed by removalof the protecting group by treatment
`with zinc and acetic acid produces taxol.
`FIG.6 illustrates a reaction using a model compound,
`which demonstrates the formation of a stable oxalyl
`heterocyclic derivative of taxol.
`
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE
`INVENTION CONVERSION OF A MIXTURE OF
`CEPHALOMANNINE AND TAXOL TO TAXOL
`
`With reference to FIGS. 1-5, a mixture of cephalo-
`mannine 2 and taxol
`1] (about 1:1) is hydrogenated at
`room temperature over a platinum catalyst
`in ethyl
`acetate solution to give a mixture of taxol and dihy-
`drocephalomannine 4 in quantitative yield. Compound
`4 below
`
`10
`
`15
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`45
`
`
`
` °
`Osaneo=(,\
`
`is a mixture of diastereomers at the 2’-position. The
`mixture was then benzoylated at the 2'-position bytreat-
`ment with one equivalent of benzoic acid in the pres-
`ence of an activating agent, which in a preferred em-
`bodiment comprises dicyclohexylcarbodiimide and 4-
`dimethylaminopyridine to yield a mixture of 2’-benzo-
`ates 5. Mixture 5, comprising the compounds 5 and 5’,
`was then
`
`65
`
`

`

`5,319,112
`
`5
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`3
`
` 8
`
`-continued
`T
`“o
`
`O
`
`OH
`
`OH
`
`O
`t
`
`o
`
`7 0 A
`
`
`
`u
`
`Owmimneny
`
`oO
`
`CH3
`
`tl
`
`NH
`
`:
`
`0 {
`
`5°
`
`converted to its 7-trichloroethyl oxycarbony! deriva-
`tive 6, shown below by reaction with 2,2,2-trichloroe-
`20 thyloxycarbonyl chloride and pyridine in methylene
`chloride. Purification of mixture 6 by flash chromatog-
`raphy gavea purified mixture in 85% yield based on the
`original mixture.
`
`
`
` \
`

`
`Oune
`
`4
`
`Q&
`
`o=(
`
`65
`
`Reaction of mixture 6 with excess oxalyl chloride at
`room temperature in benzene gave the mixture of iminio
`compounds 7 and 7’ below.
`.
`
`

`

`5,319,112
`
`Compounds 7 and 7’ appeared as a white crystalline
`precipitate over a period of 18 hoursif the reaction was
`cooled, but were also formedin solution over 5 hours at 35
`room temperature. More information on the reaction of
`amides with oxalyl chloride can be found in Chiozakiet
`al. “A New Method for the Cleavage of 7-Amide
`Group of Cephalosporins,” Tetrahedron Letters 46, 4059
`(1977). Reaction of mixture 7 with water yielded the 40
`oxamic acid derivative 8 as a single pure substance in
`
`65% yield from mixture 6.
`
`
`
`If the cephalomannine portion of the mixture is not
`hydrogenated first, reaction takes a different course.
`This can be illustrated by a model compound. Thus,
`treatment of the methy! ester 9 (R=PhCO)with oxalyl
`chloride yielded the iminium salt 10. Reaction of 10
`with methanol, however, yielded in part the ether 11, 65
`formed by Michael addition of methano! to the ap-
`unsaturated iminium salt. Similarly reaction of the non-
`hydrogenated cephalomannine-iminio ion with water
`
`would not form the oxamic acid derivative in good
`yield.
`
`t
`SyNH
`
`:
`
`Oo
`
`9
`
`‘
`
`11
`
`

`

`5,319,112
`
`11
`Conversion of oxamic acid 8 to taxol is accomplished
`by treatment with diphenylcarbodiimide. For more
`information on this type of reaction, see Shiozaki etal.
`in “Cleavage and Some Modifications of the 7-Amide
`Group of the Cephamycins,” Tetrahedron 36, 2735
`(1980), which discusses reaction of compounds with an
`oxamic acid moiety with diphenylcarbodiimide. Thus
`
`12
`the
`bis(2,2,2-trichloroethoxycarbonyl) derivative of
`aforementioned compounds. This derivative is then
`converted as previously described to the 2’,7-bis(2,2,2-
`trichloroethoxycarbonyl) analog of the iminio ion 7.
`Treatment of the iminio compound with methanol con-
`verted it to the N-debenzoyl-N-(methyloxalyl) taxol
`analog 14. The use of other alcohols, ROH,in the
`
`14
`
`Ch3C
`
`reaction of 8 with diphenylcarbodiimide in methylene ,
`chloride for 96 hours at room temperature yielded the *
`protected taxol derivative shown below as 13. It is be-
`lieved that the reaction proceedsinitially to produce the
`amino taxol derivative shown as 12 in FIG.5, and that
`O-acyl—N-acyl transfer occurs spontaneously to pro-
`duce 13. Conversion of 13 to taxol 1 was achieved by
`treatment with zinc and acetic acid, as previously de-
`scribed for similar compounds.
`
`5 quench process allows for the synthesis of analogs of
`° compound 14, where the choice of alkoxy group at the
`2” position of the C-13 side-chain is made by selection
`of the appropriate quench alcohol. Thecritical feature
`of this reaction is the presence of the nucleophilic OH
`group. Although,in a preferred embodiment, R is CH3,
`the quench alcohol R-OH,may include, but is not lim-
`ited to, any alkyl, arene, aryl or substituted alkyl or aryl.
`Illustrative, non-limiting examples of R are phenyl,
`
`30
`
`
`
`13
`
`NH
`
`
`
`CONVERSION OF CEPHALOMANNINE TO
`TAXOL
`
`Application of the reaction sequence described above
`to pure cephalomannine will yield pure taxol, since the
`reaction proceeds on a mixture of taxol and cephalo-
`mannineto yield a single pure product. In fact, experi-
`ments indicate that cephalomannine actually reacts
`somewhat more readily than taxol in this process.
`
`55
`
`PREPARATION OF ALKYL OXALATE
`ANALOGS OF TAXOL
`
`Either pure taxol, hydrogenated cephalomannine, or
`a mixture comprising either or both of these compounds
`is protected at the 2’ and 7 positions by a protecting
`group, and then converted as described previously to
`the 2',7-protected analog of the iminio ion 7. For exam-
`ple, use of the 2,2,2-trichloroethoxycarbony] (‘“‘troc’’)
`protecting group results in formation of the 2’,7-
`
`65
`
`methylphenyl, methoxyphenyl, hydroxyphenyl, trime-
`thoxyphenyl, chlorophenyl, nitrophenyl, aminophenyl,
`phenacetyl, methyl, ethyl, and t-butyl. If the quench
`alcohol in the above reaction is replaced by a metal
`hydroxide, or if the acidic proton of the oxamic acid
`derivative is replaced by ion exchange, then R can also
`be a metal such as sodium or potassium. In preferred
`embodiments, analogs of compound 14 are useful as
`anticancer agents when provided in an antineoplasti-
`cally effective amount, although this may require de-
`protection of the C-2’ and/or C-7 position to optimize
`such bioactivity.
`:
`An alternative preparation of analogs such as 14 is by
`quenching the iminio derivative with water to yield the
`ditroc analog 8, followed by treatmentof this acid with
`an alcoho! such as methanol and dilute mineral acid or
`dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (DCC). This alternate proce-
`dure is preferred for alcohols other than methanol.
`
`

`

`13
`The protecting group at the C-2’ and C-7 positions
`can be removed by reaction with the appropriate rea-
`gent. For example, reaction of 14 with Zn in acetic acid
`
`14
`example, reaction of 16 with zinc in acetic acid converts
`it to the taxol analog 17.
`
`5,319,112
`
`converts it to the taxo! analog 15.
`
`Analogs of compounds14, 15, 16, and 17 that have an
`20 acyl groupat the C-2’ position are obtained by the reac-
`tion of taxol or cephalomannineor a mixture containing
`either or both of these compounds with an acylating
`REARon:SorTAxOD mpe
`reagent (e.g. benzoic acid, See FIG. 1). The resulting
`compound, 18, is shown below. See also, Holton, U.S.
`Either pure taxol, hydrogenated cephalomannine, or
`a mixture comprising either or both of these compounds 25 Pat. No. 5,015,744, which shows other taxol analogs,
`is protected at the 2’ and 7 positions by a protecting
`acylated at the 2’ position or the 2’ and 7 position, which
`group and then converted as described previously to
`it has been discovered are suitable for use as starting
`the 2’,7-protected analog of the iminio ion 7. For exam-
`materials for producing the oxalate and oxamido deriva-
`ple, use of the 2,2,2-trichloroethoxycarbony] protecting
`tives of the present invention. The most reactive hy-
`group results in formation of the 2',7-bis(2,2,2-trichloro- 30 droxyl group at the 2’ position will be acylated in pref-
`ethoxycarbonyl) analog of the iminio ion 7. Treatment
`erence to the other hydroxyl groups on the taxol or
`of this hydrogenated compound with an amine, such as
`cephalomanninestructure. As shownin the synthesis of
`by way of non-limiting example, aniline, forms the N-
`14, where the acylating reagent is 2,2,2-trichloroethy!
`debenzoyl-N-(N’-phenyloxamide)
`analog
`16 where
`chloroformate, conditions for acylating both positions
`R=Ph.
`35 are readily available.
`
`16
`
`CCly
`
`
`
`Cih3C
`
`Appropriate acylating reagents include, but are not
`The use of other amines in the quench process allows
`limited to: carboxylic acids, carboxylic esters, anhy-
`the synthesis of any desired amide analog of compound
`16, where the choice of amide, C(O)NHR,is made by 55 drides, cyclic anhydrides, amides,
`lactams,
`lactones,
`the selection of the appropriate amine. Thus, R can be,
`acid halides (also known as acyl halides), isocyanates
`but is not limited to, any alkyl, alkene, alkyne, aryl or
`and the substituted derivatives of these compounds.
`substituted alkyl, alkene, alkyne, or aryl. Preferred ana-
`Acylation reactions sometimes require activating agents
`logs of compound 16 are useful as anticancer agents,
`such as tertiary amines and n-butyllithium. Numerous
`when administered in an antineoplastically effective 60 additional acylating reagents and activating agents not
`amount.
`specifically recited here can also be used in the present
`Analternate preparation of analogs such as 16 is by
`invention.
`quenching the iminio derivative with water to yield the
`CONVERSION OF TAXOL OR
`ditroc analog of 8, followed by treatment of this acid
`with an amine in the presence of DCC. This alternate 65 CEPHALOMANNINE ‘TO N-ACYL ANALOGS
`procedure is preferred for amines other than aniline.
`OF TAXOL
`The protecting group at the 2’ and 7 positions can be
`The method of the present invention as described
`removed by reaction with the appropriate reagent. For
`abovecan be used to prepare N-acyl taxol analogs. For
`
`

`

`15
`example, treatment of taxol with a desired acylating
`reagent will convert it to a 2’-acyltaxol derivative 18.
`
`16
`18 at the C-7 position with 2,2,2-trichloroethylchloro-
`formate will yield the protected
`
`5,319,112
`
`19
`
`Protection of
`
`derivative 19, and treatment of 19 with oxalyl chloride
`followed by wateras previously described will yield the
`oxamic acid derivative 20, where R is any desired aryl,
`
`18
`
`20
`21 by deoxyalylation 21
`
`loweralkyl, alkenyl or alkynyl or substituted aryl or
`substituted alkyl group. By way of non-limiting exam-
`ples, R is phenyl, hydroxyphenyi, methylphenyl, me-
`thoxyphenyl,
`trimethoxyphenyi, chlorophenyl, nitro-
`phenyl, acylphenyl, phenacetyl, methyl, ethyl, and
`45 ethynyl. Treatment of 20 with diphenylcarbodiimide,as
`previously described, will yield the N-acyl derivative
`
`65
`
`followed by O-acyl—N-acyl transfer. Deprotection at
`C-7 with zinc and acetic acid will then yield the N-acyl
`
`

`

`17
`taxol analog 22. The sameset of reactions could also be
`carried
`
`5,319,112
`
`
`
`
`
`oO
`
`24
`
`O
`
`OR2
`
`“4
`
`24
`
`Ry; = TCEM,R2- troc or other protecting groups
`
`out using hydrogenated cephalomannine in place of
`taxol,
`resulting in compounds 20-22 and the 2”- 20
`isobutylated analogs of 18 and 19.
`N-acyl taxol analogs are important analogs of taxol
`for anticancer treatment. The present invention pro-
`vides a simple way of preparing such analogs from taxol
`or cephalomannine without removing the side-chain.
`PREPARATION OF TAXOTERE FROM
`CEPHALOMANNINE
`
`compound 24 can then be reacted with di-t-butyl dicar-
`bonate to yield the 10-acety] taxotere derivative 25. The
`10-acetyl group of 25 can be hydrolyzed under mild
`base conditions to yield 26, and deprotection of 26 by
`zinc and acetic acid will yield taxotere 27. Alterna-
`tively, 25 can be deprotected first with zinc and acetic
`25 cid to yield 10-acetyl taxotere 28, and this can be hy-
`drolyzed under very mild conditions with methanolic
`sodium bicarbonate to yield taxotere 27.
`
`Hydrogenation of cephalomannine 2, to its dihydro
`y
`derivative 4 can be followed by protection as the 2’-tri- 30
`chloroethoxy methyl ether (TCEM)-7-troc derivative oY
`23. Other protecting groups can also be used in place of
`NH
`the TCEM andtroc derivatives. Treatment of 23 or
`i
`other 2’,7 protected analogs with oxaly! chloride fol-
`lowed by an aqueous
`
`35
`
`
`

`ll
`
`oO
`
`OH?
`oO
`S
`
`AU °
`5
`oO
`CH;
`
`ll
`Oo
`
`OCH2CCI3
`
`55
`
`25 R = TCEMortroc or other protecting group, R’ = CH3;CO
`60 26 R = TCEM ortroc or other protecting group, R' = H
`27 R=H,R'=H
`28 R =H, R’ = CH3CO
`
`quench and subsequent reaction with diphenylcarbodii-
`mide as previously described would give the amino
`derivative 24.
`
`65
`
`EXAMPLES
`The following nonlimiting examples provide specific
`synthetic methods for the conversion of a mixture of
`taxol and cephalomannine into pure taxol or N-acyl
`
`oO
`
`AOo
`
`Oo
`
`i
`
`Ow
`
`OCH?CCl3
`
`
`
`

`

`19
`analogsof taxol. Other methods and materials similar or
`equivalent to those described herein can be used in the
`practice or testing of the present
`invention. Proton
`NMRdata for selected compounds is shown in Tables
`1-3.
`
`Example 1
`Hydrogenation of taxol/cephalomannine
`A 262 mg quantity of an approximately 50/50 mixture
`of taxol and cephalomannine was dissolved in 10 mL of 10
`ethyl acetate in a 100 mL round bottom flask with mag-
`netic stirring. Then 20 mg of PtO2 was added and the
`flask was attached to a hydrogenation apparatus. After
`flushing the flask five times with hydrogen gas, the
`solution was stirred at room temperature. After 1 hour,
`the flask was removed from the hydrogenation appara-
`tus and the solution filtered through Celite to-remove
`the catalyst. The resulting solution was evaporated to
`dryness under vacuum. Theresult was 262 mg (100%)
`of a mixture of taxol and dihydrocephalomannine. No
`further puri

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket