throbber
Computer
`Systems
`Technology
`USDEPARTMENTOF
`Efiiédfia'idi‘n‘éfigteo.
`T513035”
`
`ler
`STAND
`mmiiiiiiiimiiiiiim
`
`I,
`
`' ALLLDB 7L0???
`
`NIST
`
`PUBLICATION$ ‘
`
`NIST Special Publication 500-199
`
`Mark P. Williamson
`
`The 3480 Type Tape Cartridge:
`.
`.
`Potentlal Data Storage Rlsks, and
`Care and Handling Procedures
`to Minimize Risks
`
`
`
`FUJIFILM, Exh. 2011, p. 1
`FUJIFILM v. Sony, 2018-00876
`
`

`

`FUJIFILM, Exh. 2011, p. 2
`FUJIFILM v. Sony, 2018-00876
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`l
`
`NIST Special Publication 500-199
`
`The 3480 Type Tape Cartridge:
`
`Potential Data Storage Risks, and
`Care and Handling Procedures
`to Minimize Risks
`
`Mark P. Williamson
`
`Computer Systems Laboratory
`National Institute of Standards and Technology
`Gaithersburg, MD 20899
`
`Sponsored by:
`National Environmental Satellite Data Information Service
`National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
`
`November 1991
`
`
`
`U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`Robert A. Mosbacher, Secretary
`NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS
`AND TECHNOLOGY
`John W. Lyons. Director
`
`,
`
`
`
`
`
`FUJIFILM, Exh. 2011, p. 3
`FUJIFILM v. Sony, 2018-00876
`
`

`

`Reports on Computer Systems Technology
`
`The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has a unique responsibility for computer
`systems technology within the Federal government. NlST's Computer Systems Laboratory (CSL) devel-
`ops standards and guidelines, provides technical assistance, and conducts research for computers and
`related telecommunications systems to achieve more effective utilization of Federal information technol-
`ogy resources. CSL's responsibilities include development of technical, management, physical, and ad-
`ministrative standards and guidelines for the cost-effective security and privacy of sensitive unclassified
`information processed in Federal computers. CSL assists agencies in developing security plans and in
`improving computer security awareness training. This Special Publication 500 series reports CSL re-
`search and guidelines to Federal agencies as well as to organizations in industry. government. and
`academia.
`
`National Institute of Standards and Technology Special Publication 500-199
`Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. Spec. Publ. 500-199, 59 pages (Nov. 1991)
`CODEN: NSPUE2
`
`U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE
`WASHINGTON: 1991
`
`For sale by the Superintendent of Documents. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402
`
`FUJIFILM, Exh. 2011, p. 4
`FUJIFILM v. Sony, 2018-00876
`
`

`

`Cover
`
`The figure on the cover is reproduced with permission from American National
`Standard X3.180 - 1990, copyright 1991 by the American National Standards Institute.
`Copies of this standard may be purchased from ANSI at 11 West 42nd Street, New
`York, NY 10036
`
`Disclaimer
`
`The conclusions and statements contained in this document are based on
`
`information gathered by NIST from available literature and interviews with 3480
`type tape cartridge technology users, manufacturers, and other expert sources.
`No data were taken, nor were any experiments performed in NIST laboratories.
`
`In this publication the terms "3480 type media," "3480 type technology,” ”3480 type
`tape drive,” and "3480 tape cartridge" will be used to refer to all ANSI X3.180 - 1990
`compatible, 12.65 mm (0.5 in), 18-track parallel
`recorded, chromium dioxide,
`recording media and the tape drive subsystems.
`If a specific manufacturer is intended,
`that manufacturer will be noted. However,
`the inclusion or omission of any
`manufacturer's name is only cited for clarity and does not imply endorsement or
`criticism.
`
`
`
`
`
`iii
`
`FUJIFILM, Exh. 2011, p. 5
`FUJIFILM v. Sony, 2018-00876
`
`

`

`Acknowledgments
`
`Since this publication is based on the experiences and opinions of many 3480 type
`technology users and manufacturers,
`it
`is difficult
`to mention everyone who so
`generously contributed to this publication. However,
`the author greatly appreciates
`those individuals' time and contributions.
`
`Special thanks are due to Mr. William Callicott of NCAA, Dr. P.C. Hariharan of
`STX, Dr. R.L. Bradshaw of IBM, Mr. John Felton of Carlisle Memory Products, Mr.
`Gerrit Nij ssen of BASF, and Mr. Gerald Taylor of StorageTek.
`
`Appreciation is also due to Mrs. Natalie Willman, Dr. Leslie Smith, Dr. Gordon Lyon,
`and Mr. Tom Bagg of NIST.
`
`
`
`
`
`iv
`
`FUJIFILM, Exh. 2011, p. 6
`FUJIFILM v. Sony, 2018-00876
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`Executive Summary
`
`The 3480 type media were introduced to the data storage industry in 1984. Early
`problems were reported due to premature degradation of the polyester polyurethane
`binder.
`In addition, the lack of guidelines for proper care and handling increased the
`risks associated with the storage of data on the 3480 type media.
`
`After approximately 7 years experience, media manufacturers have significantly
`improved their binder
`formulations.
`Furthermore, 3480 type media users from
`government and industry have experienced the dependability and, conversely,
`the
`problems associated with the storage of data on the 3480 type media.
`
`The major potential risks associated with the storage of data on the 3480 type media
`have been the premature degradation of the polyester polyurethane binders and the lack
`of care and handling guidelines and maintenance procedures to minimize the potential
`occurrence of chemical, mechanical, and/or magnetic failure mechanisms.
`In addition,
`questions have been raised about the potential health and environmental hazards, as
`well as the long-term stability, associated with the use of chromium dioxide (C10,)
`media.
`
`Problems were reported due to the premature degradation of the polyester polyurethane
`binder that holds the magnetic CrO2 particles to the polyethylene terephthalate (PET)
`
`substrate. Although the industry has significantly improved their binder formulations,
`it is important to remember that any manufacturer could produce a bad batch of tapes.
`The cost of the 3480 type media, as compared to the value of the data it contains,
`is
`insignificant. Therefore, to reduce the risks associated with this failure mechanism, the
`data managers should be selective in the quality of media on which they store their
`data.
`In addition, when cost effective, sampling and multiple off-site backups of data
`are prudent.
`
`The risk associated with the storage of data on any type of magnetic media is directly
`proportional to the diligence used in its proper care and handling. Proper maintenance
`of the environment, as well as the observation of some simple rules in the usage,
`storage, and transportation can greatly reduce the risk associated with the storage of
`data on magnetic media. Otherwise, chemical, mechanical, and/or magnetic failure of
`these media are possible.
`
`
`
`FUJIFILM, Exh. 2011, p. 7
`FUJIFILM v. Sony, 2018-00876
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`In general, magnetic tapes wound under tension will stretch in the direction of the
`stress and elongate with time until
`the elongation has relieved the stress.
`This
`elongation of the magnetic tape causes the tape pack to loosen. Tapes without an
`evenly tensioned pack may experience slippage of adjacent tape layers and a folding
`over of layers of tape to fill physical voids when subjected to the large accelerations
`used in 9-track open reel tape drives. Temperature variations in the storage library can
`also cause a loose tape pack [1]. Therefore, it is necessary to retension the 9-track
`open reel tapes prior to usage. The 3480 type tape drives subject the tape to lower
`accelerations when tape motion is initiated.
`In addition, the 3480 type tape drives will
`detect a loose tape pack and automatically retension the tape. However, the harmful
`effects of a loose tape pack have led to suggestions that tapes must be periodically
`retensioned during storage to restore proper tension even when usage of the tape is not
`required [2].
`
`The IBM Corporation has quantitatively examined the necessity for periodic
`retensioning of the 3480 type media [3],
`[4].
`IBM's experiment
`involved the
`accelerated aging of two identical groups of experimental 3480 type tape cartridges.
`One set of tapes was not retensioned, while the other was retensioned. The analysis of
`the two sets of tapes showed equal chemical and mechanical changes. However, the
`tapes that were retensioned showed a catastrophic increase in the error rate which IBM
`attributed to the renewal of mechanical stresses and the binder-particle interaction.
`
`there is little evidence that users
`Based on interviews with magnetic media users,
`actually retension their
`tapes periodically. Not only does periodic retensioning
`introduce a large expense and effort into the maintenance of a data library, published
`literature indicates that these activities not be necessary [1],[3],[4].
`
`In the June 9, 1986 issue of ComputerWorld magazine, an article entitled "Taking
`Chances with New Tapes" states that CrO2 which is used in the 3480 type media
`
`degrades in the presence of moisture and oxygen to chromium hexavalent which is
`toxic. This suggests that the toxic nature of chromium dioxide may present health
`hazards to the user and environmental hazards when the tapes are disposed of in a
`landfill. In addition,
`this article states that CrO2 may have poor long-term storage
`
`The Du Pont
`characteristics, since this material has a fairly short half-life [5].
`Corporation, which has been the primary manufacturer of CrO2 particles of audio,
`
`video, and instrumentation tape applications for 20 years, responded to this article with
`a white paper that was published as a Technical Committee X3B5, Digital Magnetic
`Tape document [6]. Their conclusions are that CrO2 tapes present neither a hazard to
`
`the health of the user, nor to the environment, when the tapes are discarded in landfills.
`Du Pont also asserted that CrO2 media is well suited for the long-term storage of data.
`
`Most of the 3480 type media experts, users, and manufacturers interviewed agree with
`this conclusion.
`
`vi
`
`
`
`FUJIFILM, Exh. 2011, p. 8
`FUJIFILM v. Sony, 2018-00876
`
`

`

`Based on the opinions and observations of 3480 type media users and manufacturers,
`there seems to be a low risk associated with the storage of data on 3480 type media,
`provided the proper care and handling procedures are used. The 3480 type technology
`manufacturers indicate that there is a very high probability that the 3480 type media
`will retain data for at least 10 years.
`Some 3480 type media experts, users, and
`manufacturers interviewed believe that this is a conservative estimate.
`
`The predicated 10-year length of time in which the 3480 type media can retain data is
`expected to be greater than the length of time before the 3480 type recording systems
`are superseded by more advanced products. For example, IBM introduced the 18-
`track, parallel 3480 recording system in 1984. Now, approximately 7 years later, IBM
`has introduced the next generation 3490B which uses the same media with a 36-track,
`parallel-serpentine recording system. Nevertheless, if a data center is still using the
`3480 type technology after 10 years, it would be prudent to migrate the data to new
`media at that time.
`
`
`
`
`
`vii
`
`FUJIFILM, Exh. 2011, p. 9
`FUJIFILM v. Sony, 2018-00876
`
`

`

`FUJIFILM, Exh. 2011, p. 10
`FUJIFILM v. Sony, 2018-00876
`
`

`

`Table of Contents
`
`1
`
`2
`
`Introduction .......................................................................
`
`3480 Type Recording System ..................................................
`
`2.1
`
`3480 Type Tape Structure ...............................................
`
`2.2
`
`3480 Type Cartridge Assembly .........................................
`
`2.3
`
`3480 Type Tape Drive Assembly ......................................
`
`2.4
`
`3480 Type Methods of Recording and Error Correction ............
`
`3
`
`Potential Failure Mechanisms .................................................
`
`3.1
`
`Chemical ...................................................................
`
`3.2 Mechanical .................................................................
`
`3.2.1 Stick ...............................................................
`
`3.2.2 Embossment by Debris ..........................................
`3.2.3 Inter-Layer Slip ..................................................
`3.2.4 Cinching ...........................................................
`3.2.5 Creep ..............................................................
`
`3.3 Magnetic ...................................................................
`3.3.1 Temperature Effects on Magnetization .......................
`3.3.2 Magnetostriction .................................................
`3.3.3 Stray Magnetic Fields ...........................................
`
`4
`
`General Care and Handling Guidelines
`
`.......
`
`.............
`
`.....
`
`4.1
`
`Environment ...............................................................
`
`4.1.1 Operational Environment .......................................
`4.1.2 Storage Environment ............................................
`4.1.3 Transportation Environment....................................
`
`1
`
`3
`
`3
`
`5
`
`6
`
`8
`
`10
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`12
`12
`13
`13
`
`13
`13
`14
`14
`
`15
`
`15
`
`15
`16
`16
`
`ix
`
`FUJIFILM, Exh. 2011, p. 11
`FUJIFILM v. Sony, 2018-00876
`
`

`

`4.2
`
`Operational and Storage Environmental Maintenance ...............
`
`4.3
`
`Transportation Guidelines ...............................................
`4.3.1 Packaging for Transportation ..................................
`4.3.2 Handling During Transportation ...............................
`4.3.3 Conditioning to New Environments ....................... .. . ..
`
`4.4
`
`General Care and Handling Tips .......................................
`
`4.5
`
`3480 Type Tape Drive Maintenance ...................................
`4.5.1 3480 Type Cleaning Cartridge .................................
`4.5.2 Wet Cleaning ....................................................
`
`4.6
`
`Fire Protection Recommendations .....................................
`
`4.7 Water Protection Recommendations ...................................
`
`4.8
`
`Contamination Migration Avoidance Recommendations ............
`
`Retensioning 3480 Type Tape Cartridges ...................................
`
`Chromium Dioxide's Toxic Nature ...........................................
`
`6.1
`
`Potential Health Risks ....................................................
`
`6.2
`
`Potential Disposal Problems ............................................
`
`Information from Users .........................................................
`
`7.1
`
`Internal Revenue Service ................................................
`
`National Center for Atmospheric Research ...........................
`7.2
`7.3 Mobil Exploration and Producing Services Inc. .....................
`7.4
`Shell Oil Company .......................................................
`7.5
`Social Security Administration .........................................
`7.6
`The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints ....................
`7.7 Western Geophysical ....................................................
`
`17
`
`18
`
`18
`
`19
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`21
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`27
`
`27
`
`27
`
`28
`
`28
`
`28
`
`29
`29
`
`30
`31
`
`31
`
`
`
`
`
`FUJIFILM, Exh. 2011, p. 12
`FUJIFILM v. Sony, 2018-00876
`
`

`

`Information from Manufacturers .............................................
`
`8.1
`
`8.2
`
`8.3
`8.4
`
`8.5
`
`8.6
`
`3M ..........................................................................
`
`BASF .......................................................................
`
`Carlisle Memory Products ...............................................
`Du Pont ....................................................................
`
`IBM ........................................................................
`
`StorageTek .................................................................
`
`Infomation from other Sources on...cooo'oooo'tuoottu.notoctooottcttooocotoc
`
`9.1
`9.2
`
`National Media Laboratory ..............................................
`Battelle .....................................................................
`
`10
`
`Conclusions ........................................................................
`
`Definitions .................... . .......
`
`......
`
`..............
`
`33
`
`33
`
`33
`34
`
`34
`35
`
`35
`
`36
`
`36
`
`36
`
`39
`
`40
`
`References ................................................................ . ........
`
`43
`
`Other References.............. ........
`
`...............
`
`........
`
`45
`
`
`
`
`
`xi
`
`FUJIFILM, Exh. 2011, p. 13
`FUJIFILM v. Sony, 2018-00876
`
`

`

`List of Figures
`
`Figure
`Figure
`Figure
`Figure
`Figure
`Figure
`Figure
`
`\lO‘lLIl-P-DJNr—I
`
`3480 Type Tape Structure ...............................................
`3480 Type Tape Cartridge Assembly ..................................
`3480 Type Tape Drive Assembly ......................................
`3480 Type Tape Usable Recording Area ..............................
`Temperature and Humidity Table ......................................
`Summary of User Information ..........................................
`Summary of Manufacturer and Other Source Information .........
`
`4
`5
`7
`9
`16
`32
`37
`
`
`
`
`
`xii
`
`FUJIFILM, Exh. 2011, p. 14
`FUJIFILM v. Sony, 2018-00876
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`1. Introduction
`
`The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) has accumulated
`extensive historical records of oceanic and atmospheric currents and weather extending
`back through most of the 20th century, and in some instances, into the middle 19th
`century.
`Included are both in—situ
`and satellite observations covering ocean,
`atmosphere and land.
`These records, which span the industrial
`revolution and
`subsequent periods of rapid economic development, are invaluable in baseline scientific
`studies, model verification, and assessment of environmental trends.
`
`Much of NOAA's data and information at its data centers are still held in hard copy
`form (e. g., paper or microfilm). Altogether, over 90 million records of handwritten
`and printed text and drawings, atlases and maps, numerical tables, etc., have been
`identified as worth retaining. Digitizing and migrating these material into automated
`systems will be a massive task, but an essential one.
`In their current form, the records
`are neither stable nor easily accessible and, therefore, not really useful.
`
`tape, of which
`In addition, NOAA retains over 241,000 reels of magnetic
`approximately 60,000 units are the 3480 type tape cartridges. Eighty percent of the 9-
`track open reel tapes have never been backed up, and 40% of these tapes are now at the
`end of their typical life span. Some permanent tape damage on 9-track open reel tapes
`has already been documented, resulting in the loss of valuable satellite data. The only
`immediate approach to this problem is bulk transcription to new tapes, and eventual
`migration to modern and more cost-efficient media.
`
`In 1985, NOAA began copying its archive information to the 3480 type technology in
`lieu of using the 9-track open reel tapes. This was done to take advantage of the
`smaller volume required to store the media, and to exploit
`the enhanced error
`correction and performance of the 3480 type technology. However, soon after NOAA
`began using these media,
`the industry began reporting problems associated with the
`premature degradation of the polyester polyurethane binders which hold the magnetic
`chromium dioxide particles (CIOQ to the polyethylene terephthalate (PET) substrate.
`NOAA has not experienced any of these problems in its operations. However, there is
`concern that the archiving of satellite data has unknown risk because of the lack of
`documented experiences related to the 3480 type media.
`
`
`
`FUJIFILM, Exh. 2011, p. 15
`FUJIFILM v. Sony, 2018-00876
`
`

`

`The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), under the sponsorship of
`NCAA, has undertaken an appraisal of the potential risks associated with the storage of
`data on the 3480 type media. This study discusses the findings of the appraisal and, in
`addition, summarizes reasonable procedures for the care and handling of the 3480 type
`media in order to minimize the potential risks. This report is intended to inform data
`managers of the potential chemical, mechanical, and magnetic failure mechanisms
`associated with the 3480 type media and to summarize the experiences and
`recommendations of major 3480 type technology users and manufactures.
`
`In addition, recommendations from applicable scientific literature and the opinions of
`other media experts are included. This document is a guideline and reference for data
`managers who are attempting to minimize potential risks associated with the storage of
`valuable data on the 3480 type tape cartridges.
`
`
`
`
`
`FUJIFILM, Exh. 2011, p. 16
`FUJIFILM v. Sony, 2018-00876
`
`

`

`2. 3480 Type Recording System
`
`To reliably store data on computer magnetic storage systems it is necessary to study the
`reliability of the entire system (e.g., tape, cartridge, error correction, transport, etc.).
`While most scientific documents focus their attention on the reliability and life
`expectancy of the magnetic tape components (e.g., substrate, magnetic particles, binder
`formulations), it is important that the data managers keep a systems point of view. The
`3480 type technology systems have employed several new features which provide a
`substantial
`improvement
`in performance and reliability over the 9—t1ack open reel
`systems.
`These new features include:
`the cartridge, a tape-lifter ("puffer"), and
`powerful error correction capabilities. The following sections discuss the 3480 type
`tape structure, the 3480 type cartridge assembly,
`the 3480 type tape drive assembly,
`and the 3480 type methods of recording and error correction.
`
`2.1 3480 Type Tape Structure
`
`The 3480 type tape consists of acicular chromium dioxide (CrOz) particles dispersed in
`
`a polyester polyurethane binder onto a polyethylene terephthalate (PET) substrate.
`Some 3480 type tapes have a back—coating consisting of carbon particles, which helps
`to reduce problems associated with static electricity.
`
`The actual formulas of the binders are considered proprietary information by each
`media manufacturer. However,
`typical ingredients include: binder material, solvents,
`softener, wetting agents, anti—static agents, lubricants, and abrasive agents [7]. Some
`older tape technology binder formulations included fungicides.
`Fungicides are not
`required for the 3480 type tape technology since chromium is itself a fungicide.
`
`According to the ANSI X3.180—l990 standard, the 3480 type media must be not less
`than 165 meters (541 feet) long and the total thickness at any point along the tape must
`be between 25.9 pm and 33.7 um (1020 pin and 1330 uin). The width specification of
`the 3480 type tape is 12.65 mm +/- 0.025 mm (0.4980 in +/- 0.0010 in).
`
`
`
`FUJIFILM, Exh. 2011, p. 17
`FUJIFILM v. Sony, 2018-00876
`
`

`

`
`
`Polyethylene Terephthalate
`(PET) Substrate
`
` The magnetic coating of chromium
`
`dioxide particles held in a polyester
`polyurethane binder.
`
`The optional backcoat layer of carbon
`particles held in a polyester polyurethane binder
`
`Figure 1. 3480 Type Tape Structure.
`
`
`
`FUJIFILM, Exh. 2011, p. 18
`FUJIFILM v. Sony, 2018-00876
`
`

`

`2.2 3480 Type Tape Cartridge Assembly
`
`The 3480 type tape is housed in a single reel cartridge. The tape is mechanically fed
`from this cartridge to a take-up reel in the tape drive. The cartridge provides some
`environmental protection, as well as less intimate user—to-tape contact. The cartridge
`components include: case, write—file protect mechanism, reel for the magnetic tape,
`locking mechanism for the reel, magnetic tape wound on the hub of the reel, leader
`block, and latching mechanism for the leader block [8].
`
`TOP SIDE
`
`
`
`MAGNETIC TAPE
`
`RECORDING SURFACE
`
`
`REAR SIDE
`
`LOCATING
`NOTCH
`
`LEADER BLOCK
`
`
`
`-
`F
`
`WRITE INHIBIT SUR ACE
`BOTTOM SIDE
`
`FRONT SIDE
`RIGHT-HAND SIDE
`
`Figure 2. 3480 Type Tape Cartridge Assembly.
`
`This material is reproduced with permission from American National Standard X3. 180-1990, copyright
`1991 by the American National Standards Institute. Copies of this standard may be purchased from
`ANSI at 11 West 42nd Street, New York, N. Y. 10036
`
`
`
`
`
`FUJIFILM, Exh. 2011, p. 19
`FUJIFILM v. Sony, 2018-00876
`
`

`

`2.3 3480 Type Tape Drive Assembly
`
`tungsten
`The tape drive assembly consists of the cartridge loader, tape threader arm,
`carbide cleaning blades, read/write head, puffer, take-up reel, and tension transducer.
`
`the automatic
`When the 3480 type tape cartridge is loaded into the cartridge loader,
`threader arm's pin inserts into the leader block and threads the tape past the cleaner
`blades and read/write head to the take-up reel.
`Tape tension is controlled and
`
`maintained by the tension transducer.
`
`Unlike the open reel tape drives, the 3480 type tape drive moves the tape without the
`use of capstans or vacuum columns [9]. The 3480 type technology digital servo control
`system and new thin film head technology permit low acceleration tape motion, which
`eliminates the need for vacuum columns, capstans, and beginning of tape/end of tape
`reflective markers [10].
`
`The 3480 read/write head is a combination of magnetoresistive thin-film read elements,
`planar thin film write turns, and ferrite pole-pieces [11].
`
`An additional feature of the 3480 type tape drive is the tungsten carbide cleaning blades
`which scrape the recording surface of the tape to remove debris. This cleaning action is
`assisted by a vacuum that sucks away the debris loosened by the cleaning blades [1 l].
`
`The 3480 type tape drives also include a tape-lifter, called a "puffer." The puffer
`introduces a jet of air between the head and tape whenever the tape is stopped. This
`film of air between the tape and head prevents intimate contact, which effectively
`reduces problems with machine drag and the possibility of head-to-tape adhesion [4].
`
`
`
`
`
`FUJIFILM, Exh. 2011, p. 20
`FUJIFILM v. Sony, 2018-00876
`
`

`

`Figure 3. 3480 Type Tape Drive Assembly.
`
`Courtesy of the IBM Corporation
`ation
`1984, 1987, 1989 All Rights Reserved
`Copyright IBM Corpor
`
`FUJIFILM, Exh. 2011, p. 21
`FUJIFILM v. Sony, 2018-00876
`
`
`
`

`

`2.4 3480 Type Methods of Recording and Error Correction
`
`The 3480 type tape systems record data on 18 tracks in parallel. These systems feature
`a three million byte per second instantaneous data rate, and a linear data density of
`1491 Bpmm (approx. 38 kBpi.) [8],[12]. The result is approximately 200 million bytes
`per cartridge capacity. Since media manufacturers vary in the actual length of their
`tape per cartridge, the overall capacities vary slightly.
`
`Magnetic tape systems use error correction codes (ECC) to improve data integrity and
`performance. The 3480 type systems use an ECC scheme called adaptive cross-parity
`(AXP). The 3480 type media's 18 tracks are divided into two interleaved groups of
`nine tracks. Each group consists of seven data tracks and two error check tracks. This
`method can correct up to three erased tracks of data in any one group of nine tracks and
`up to four erased tracks of data in the 18 tracks together.
`This ECC scheme has
`interacting vertical-parity check bits and cross-parity check bits, which provide
`robustness due to redundancy in the correction of errors [8], [12].
`
`Data are verified and corrected during the write process by the 3480 type tape drive's
`ECC. As a result, gross manufacturing failures in the media are detected during the
`write process.
`In other words, if you can write a 3480 type tape cartridge, you can
`read it. This philosophy assumes that no chemical, mechanical, and/or magnetic modes
`of failure have occurred during storage.
`
`
`
`
`
`FUJIFILM, Exh. 2011, p. 22
`FUJIFILM v. Sony, 2018-00876
`
`

`

`LEADER BLOCK
`
`BOT
`
`
`
`
`1.34 m JE:>‘
`_
`32
`4.401!
`MAXIMUM
`10.6871? M'N'MUM
`
`
`
`TAPE BACK
`
`155 [TI
`541" MINIMUM TOTAL LENGTH
`4.3 m MINIMUM
`
`TAPE REFERENCE EDGE
`
`
`
`
`TRACK 1
`
` RECORDING
`TRACK 18
`SURFACE
`
`
`TAPE-TO-HUB
`
`JUNCTION
`
`
`Figure 4. 3480 Type Tape Usable Recording Area.
`
`171is material is reproduced with permission from American National Standard X3.180—1990, copyright
`1991 by the American National Standards Institute. Copies of this standard may be purchased from
`ANSI at 11 West 42nd Street, New York, N. Y. 10036
`
`FUJIFILM, Exh. 2011, p. 23
`FUJIFILM v. Sony, 2018-00876
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`3. Potential Failure Mechanisms
`
`There are a number of hazards which can lead to catastrophic failures of magnetic
`media, resulting in the inability to recover the data written on the media. Removable
`magnetic media are, by their nature, subject to the function of interchanging data both
`within and among various computer installations. This makes the environmental and
`handling conditions to which they are exposed relatively uncontrolled [4].
`Poor
`maintenance of the environment and improper care and handling procedures may lead
`to chemical, mechanical, and/or magnetic failure of the media and, consequently, the
`loss of data.
`
`Excursions in temperature and humidity have the most harmful effects on magnetic
`media, and cause the majority of chemical, mechanical, and magnetic failures. The
`3480 type tape cartridges are no exception. Magnetic tapes are manufactured in an
`environment of approximately 18 °C (65 0F) and 40% RH.
`The most optimum
`condition would be to maintain these media in this steady-state environment at all
`times.
`
`3.1 Chemical
`
`Based on extensive work involving iron oxide based magnetic tapes, one of the most
`likely modes of failure on a 3480 type tape cartridge is the premature degradation of
`the polyester polyurethane binder which holds the CrO2 particles to the PET substrate.
`
`the PET substrate displays
`Under the proper environmental and handling conditions,
`the polyester polyurethane
`relatively low levels of hydrolytic cleavage. However,
`binder under the same conditions undergoes a much higher degree of hydrolysis. This
`may result in a softening, embrittlement, and/or loss of adhesion of the binder layer to
`the PET substrate [1]. This work refers only to binders containing gamma-ferric oxide
`(gamma-F6203). Some aspects of the formulation are different for CrO2 tapes. The
`
`conclusion that the same mechanisms are equally important to the 3480 type media is
`by analogy, but a reasonable conclusion.
`
`The binder degradation is caused by hydrolysis, which is the breakdown of an ester to
`its parent carboxylic acid and alcohol. The chemical reactions of water with polymer
`materials, and the hydrolytic action on the polyester polyurethane tape binders has been
`studied in depth [l3], [14],
`[15].
`Some important conclusions of these studies are
`discused below.
`
`10
`
`
`
`FUJIFILM, Exh. 2011, p. 24
`FUJIFILM v. Sony, 2018-00876
`
`

`

`Hydrolytic degradation will cause the production of carboxylic acids and alcohol. This
`chemical reaction will cause the tapes to become sticky and,
`in the worst cases, will
`lead to the shedding of gummy and sticky chemical byproducts.
`These chemical
`byproducts will
`lead to extensive mechanical
`failures. Furthermore, hydrolytically
`produced debris may contaminate the mechanical components of the tape drive and, as
`a result, contaminate other media and other drives (see sec. 4.8).
`In addition, sticky
`tapes will have an increase in their
`frictional characteristics, which can lead to
`mechanical failures causing the data signals to be read in error. The errors caused by
`hydrolytic degradation are more obvious with the higher density data capacities of
`modern data storage technologies, such as the 3480 type technology.
`
`Hydrolysis is caused primarily by poor environments. Although the effect of high
`temperature and humidity are stressed, extreme cold temperatures will cause the tape's
`binder to become brittle and the PET to shrink. Also, adjacent layers of tape may
`adhere to one another.
`In addition, problems during usage with static electricity will
`occur in extreme dry environments.
`
`the suggested environment for the long term storage of data has been
`Therefore,
`determined to be approximately 18 0C (65 0F), and 40% RH, which is a compromise
`between conflicting demands [2].
`
`3.2 Mechanical
`
`Steady—state environmental conditions are also important for the mechanical stability of
`the 3480 tape media. Variations in environmental conditions can cause expansion and
`contraction of the 3480 type media. This shrinking and stretching of the tape can be
`caused by thermal expansion (variations in temperature), and/or hygroscopic expansion
`(the motion of water in and out of the tape).
`
`Chemical degradation, variations in temperature and humidity, and poor handling
`procedures can cause mechanical distortions of the tape. These distortions may then
`lead to errors due to the disruption in the physical positioning of the data bits,
`the
`inability of the transport
`to properly move the tape, changes in the frictional
`characteristics of the tape, and/or the physical destruction of the media. Some of these
`mechanical modes of failure are:
`stick, embossment of debris,
`inter-layer slip,
`
`cinching, and creep.
`
`ll
`
`
`
`FUJIFILM, Exh. 2011, p. 25
`FUJIFILM v. Sony, 2018-00876
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`3.2.1 Stick
`
`With increased temperature, the p

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket