`Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822 Entered: February 21, 2018
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`GOOGLE LLC,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`ALEX IS THE BEST, LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2017-02052 (Patent 7,907,172 B2)
`Case IPR2017-02053 (Patent 8,477,197 B2)
`Case IPR2017-02054 (Patent 7,633,524 B2)
`Case IPR2017-02057 (Patent 9,197,806 B2)
`Case IPR2017-02058 (Patent 8,581,991 B1)1
`____________
`
`
`
`Before DANIEL N. FISHMAN, MINN CHUNG, and
`JESSICA C. KAISER, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`FISHMAN, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Granting Petitioner’s Motion for
`Pro Hac Vice Admission of Jeffrey C. Morgan
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`
`1 This Order applies to each referenced case. The parties are not authorized
`to use this heading style.
`
`
`
`IPR2017-02052 (Patent 7,907,172 B2)
`IPR2017-02053 (Patent 8,477,197 B2)
`IPR2017-02054 (Patent 7,633,524 B2)
`IPR2017-02057 (Patent 9,197,806 B2)
`IPR2017-02058 (Patent 8,581,991 B1)
`
`
`
`In each of the identified cases, Petitioner moves for pro hac vice
`recognition of Jeffrey C. Morgan (IPR2017-02052 Paper 8; IPR2017-02053
`Paper 8; IPR2017-02054 Paper 8; IPR2017-02057 Paper 8; IPR2017-02058
`Paper 8). Each such motion is supported by a corresponding Declaration of
`Mr. Morgan. (IPR2017-02052 Ex. 1012; IPR2017-02053 Ex. 1012;
`IPR2017-02054 Ex. 1011; IPR2017-02057 Ex. 1012; IPR2017-02058 Ex.
`1011). In each such motion, Petitioner indicates Patent Owner does not
`oppose the motion. See, e.g., IPR2017-02052, Paper 8, 1. The motions are
`granted. Petitioner shall update PTABE2E records accordingly. Petitioner
`also shall submit an updated power of attorney including Mr. Morgan.
`Counsel recognized pro hac vice shall comply with 37 C.F.R. Parts 11 and
`42 and the Office Patent Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed. Reg. 48,755 (Aug. 14,
`2012), and is subject to disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2017-02052 (Patent 7,907,172 B2)
`IPR2017-02053 (Patent 8,477,197 B2)
`IPR2017-02054 (Patent 7,633,524 B2)
`IPR2017-02057 (Patent 9,197,806 B2)
`IPR2017-02058 (Patent 8,581,991 B1)
`
`It is:
`
`ORDERED that Petitioner’s motions for pro hac vice admission of
`Jeffrey C. Morgan for the above-identified proceedings are granted; Mr.
`Morgan is authorized to represent Petitioner only as back-up counsel in the
`above-identified proceedings;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Morgan is to comply with the Office
`Patent Trial Practice Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials, as
`set forth in Part 42 of 37 C.F.R., and is to be subject to the USPTO Rules of
`Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq., and
`disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a); and
`FURTHER ORDERED that Patent Owner is to continue to have a
`registered practitioner represent it as lead counsel in the above-identified
`proceedings.
`
`
`FOR PETITIONER:
`
`Joshua Larsen
`johua.larsen@btlaw.com
`
`Steven Shipe
`steven.shipe@btlaw.com
`
`FOR PATENT OWNER:
`
`C. Andrew Im
`docket@implaw.com
`
`
`3
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
