`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`Paper No. 13
`Entered: March 20, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`KINGSTON TECHNOLOGY COMPANY, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`POLARIS INNOVATIONS LTD.,
`Patent Owner.
`
` Case IPR2016-01621 (Patent 6,438,057 B1)1
` Case IPR2016-01622 (Patent 6,850,414 B2)
`Case IPR2016-01623 (Patent 7,315,454 B2)
`
`
`Before SALLY C. MEDLEY, JEAN R. HOMERE, and
`MATTHEW R. CLEMENTS, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`HOMERE, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Conduct of the Proceedings
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5(a)
`
`1 This Order addresses issues that are the same in all identified cases. We,
`therefore, exercise our discretion to issue one Order to be filed in each case.
`The parties, however, are not authorized to use this style heading for any
`subsequent papers without prior approval by the Board.
`
`
`
`
`IPR2016-01621 (Patent 6,438,057 B1)
`IPR2016-01622 (Patent 6,850,414 B2)
`IPR2016-01623 (Patent 7,315,454 B2)
`
`
`An initial conference call in the above proceedings was held on March
`15, 2017, between respective counsel for the parties, and Judges Medley,
`Homere, and Clements.
`Prior to the call, only Patent Owner filed a proposed motions list. On
`the call, each party confirmed that, at this time, it does not anticipate filing
`any motions not already authorized by our Rules or in the Scheduling Order.
`Patent Owner plans to file a motion to amend by the due date set forth in the
`Scheduling Order, and will request a call to confer with the Board
`beforehand. Neither party is aware of any settlement discussion regarding
`the current proceedings or the parallel litigation proceeding.
`Each party also confirmed that it does not have any issue with Due
`Dates 1–6, as currently set.
`For now, with respect to Due Date 7, each party confirmed that it has
`no conflict with scheduling the oral argument, if requested, on November
`14, 2017. Also, both parties expressed a preference for conducting the
`hearing in San Jose, California. The panel has determined that a hearing
`room in San Jose, California, is available on November 14, 2017. Thus,
`pending receipt of timely party requests for a hearing, it appears at this time
`that we will be able to accommodate the parties’ preference to conduct the
`hearing in San Jose, California.
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2016-01621 (Patent 6,438,057 B1)
`IPR2016-01622 (Patent 6,850,414 B2)
`IPR2016-01623 (Patent 7,315,454 B2)
`
`For PETITIONER:
`
`David Hoffman
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`IPR37307-0007IP1@fr.com
`
`Martha Hopkins
`LAW OFFICES OF S.J. CHRISTINE YANG
`IPR@sjclawpc.com
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`
`Kenneth Weatherwax
`Nathan Lowenstein
`LOWENSTEIN & WEATHERWAX LLP
`weatherwax@lowensteinweatherwax.com
`lowenstein@lowensteinweatherwax.com
`
`
`3
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
