`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
`
`OXBO INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION,
`
`v.
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`SPECIAL VERDICT FORM:
`LIABILITY
`
`H&S MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC.,
`
`15-cv-292-jdp
`
`Defendant.
`
`We, the jury, for our special verdict, do find as follows:
`
`INFRINGEMENT
`
`Has plaintiff proven to a preponderance of the evidence that defendant's products,
`
`the Tri-Flex mergers, infringe claim 28 of the '929 patent?
`
`ANSWER: ----lf-¥_.-e___.S'------ ("yes" or "no")
`
`A "yes" is a finding for plaintiff and a "no" is a finding for defendant.
`
`Regardless of whether you answered "yes" or "no" above, go on and answer the
`
`questions in the following invalidity section.
`
`Oxbo International Corporation, Patent Owner
`Exhibit 2022
`H&S Manufacturing, Inc. v. Oxbo International Corporation
`IPR 2016-00950
`
`
`
`Case: 3:15-cv-00292-jdp Document #: 498 Filed: 06/16/17 Page 2 of 2
`
`INVALIDITY
`
`Has defendant proven by clear and convincing evidence that the following patent
`
`claims are invalid because they were obvious?
`
`Patent Claim
`
`Yes
`
`Claim 44 of the '929 patent
`
`Claim 1 of the '739 patent
`
`Claim I of the '488 patent
`
`Claim 2 of the '488 patent
`
`Claim 4 of the '488 patent
`
`Claim 6 of the '488 patent
`
`Claim 8 of the '488 patent
`
`Claim 10 of the '488 patent
`
`No
`v"
`/
`v
`./
`\/"
`v'
`~
`/
`
`A "yes" is a finding for defendant and a "no" is a finding for plaintiff.
`
`~o r~
`
`Madison, Wisconsin
`Dated this J.& day of June, 2017
`
`Oxbo International Corporation, Patent Owner
`Exhibit 2022
`H&S Manufacturing, Inc. v. Oxbo International Corporation
`IPR 2016-00950
`
`