`Case: 3:15-cv-00292-jdp Document #: 517 Filed: 06/22/17 Page 1 of 2
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
`
`OXBO INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION,
`
`v.
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`SPECIAL VERDICT FORM:
`DAMAGES
`
`H815 MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC.,
`
`15-cv-292-jdp
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`We, the jury, for our special verdict, do find as follows:
`
`QUESTION NO. 1: Did plaintiff and its licensee mark substantially all products
`
`covered by the triple head patents during the term of the Kuhn cross license?
`
`ANSWER:
`
`g S”
`
`(“yes” or “no”)
`
`QUESTION NO. 2: Is plaintiff entitled to recover lost profits with respect to the
`
`’929 patent, the ’739 patent, and the ’488 patent?
`
`ANSWER:
`
`I y(
`
`(“yes” or “no”)
`
`If “yes,” answer question 3. If “no,” go to question 4.
`
`QUESTION NO. 3: What amount of lost profits is plaintiff entitled to recover?
`
`$ gig
`
`If you answered question 2 “yes,” skip question 4 and go to question 5. If you
`
`answered question 2 “no,” go to question 4.
`
`H&S Mfg. Co., Inc. v. Oxbo Int'l Co. |PR2016-0095O
`
`H&S Mfg Co., Inc.
`Exhibit 1028
`
`
`
`Case: 3:15-cv-00292-jdp Document #: 517 Filed: 06/22/17 Page 2 of 2
`Case: 3:15-cv-00292-jdp Document #: 517 Filed: 06/22/17 Page 2 of 2
`
`QUESTION NO. 4: What is a reasonable royalty for defendant’s use of the 929
`
`patent, the ’739 patent, and the ’488 patent?
`
`$ 83f,QQO
`
`Regardless of how you answered any of the previous questions, answer question 5:
`
`QUESTION NO. 5: What is a reasonable royalty for defendant’s use of the ’052
`
`patent?
`
`$
`
`52 ‘5”, (gag;
`
`Regardless of how you answered any of the previous questions, answer question 6.
`
`QUESTION NO. 6: Do you find that defendant’s infringement of the ’929 patent
`
`was willful?
`
`ANSWER:
`
`26
`
`(“yes” or “no”)
`
`Ar“yes” is a finding for plaintiff and a “no” is a finding for defendant.
`
`Presiding Ju r
`
`Madison, Wisconsin
`
`Dated this 92L day of June, 2017
`
`