throbber
4») IEEE JOURNAL OF
`
`o
`
`.OLIDSTATE
`IRCUITS
`3" CEMBER 1992
`VOLUME 27
`
`NUMBER 12
`
`{T1131727.:}
`
`5.1.1. {-1
`
`----
`leMRlFSUSSNailm-41200)
`
`puoucmou OF 11115113155 sow-STATE crucurrs COUNCIL
`
`1 l
`
`l
`
`l
`
`SPECIAL ISSUE 0N ANALOG AND SIGNAL PROCESSING CIRCUITS
`
`............................... ......n. P. Colbeckandk. R. Spencer
`
`I659
`
`
`
`1 |
`
`3L
`“
`
`1‘1
`‘
`
`.
`
`1
`.
`
`‘
`
`‘1?
`
`f
`
`1.1110110 ......................................
`1
`l \L PAPERS
`I662
`11 11 650MHz Folding ADC ................................... . .............1.11m Wilma and R. J. 111111 1!: Planck:
`l661
`l: h 5Memphis Two-Step CMOS AID Converter.................
`B Ramvlandfl. A. Wooley
`l679
`'1 1 ilulDomain Calibration of Multlntep Analog-tonigital Cont/errata"... .......
`........ 5.41 La: and 8.6.5011;
`Overanmpling Convener for Strain Gauge Trunsducenr.. .. ...
`... ... ...D. A. Ker-1h «MD. 5. lefl 1689
`I .‘--/1111 BlCMOS Sample-”andHold Circuit With a Cmtant-lmpetlnnee. Slew/«Enhanced Sampling Gale.... ..........
`............................................... ...M H. Wakayanm. H. Tom'mm. T Tim». and l’ Yuthlda‘ N197 .
`1111MHz 100118 Operational Amplllier with Multipth Nested Miller Compensation Structure... ...........-....1
`‘-
`.................................................. R U.”.E.1chauzier.l.. P T Kcrlrlaort. andJ. H. ”111751113
`I709
`1:
`‘Cumpact Bipolar Class-AB Output Stage Using I~V Power Supply .............................. .. .....“.F I. M T1111: NIB
`.4;
`‘1 Hnghly Eificient CMOS Linc Driver with 80-113 Linearity for lSDN U-lnterfaoe Applications...
`.
`............................................................ H Khmmmabadl. J. Amidjar. andT. R. Peri-rm l723
`l
`' \ Inherently Linear and Compact MOST-Only Current Division Technique ............K Bull undo. I. G M. Get-Ian
`I730
`l55-MHz Clock Recovery Delay- and Plumlnclted Loop ........................... T ”.112de F. Ballade!!! ”36
`51 Bipolar Phase and Frequency Detector [C M Clock Extraction up to 8 Gbls
`.......................................... ..............A..Ponbdckn 0.1011an andH.U.ScIirelh¢r
`. 1(in Integrated Pilate-locked Loop Using AlGaAsK‘iaAs Heterojunction Bipollr Transistors
`............................................. A. W. Butllmrld. K. W. Martin. A K. Oki. andK W. Kalmmhi
`i
`('19 lC's for Clock and Data Regeneration1n Gigabit[21-81:ch Optical-Fiber Receivers
`....................
`.................................................................... ..........s K (5an am”. A 11111211
`1 (' Hz Si Bipolar Amplifier and Mixer IL“: for Coherent Optical Systems
`..... . ....................................
`................ T. Grimm. C Kurlota. Y Kamishl. 0.11m». T. Scuba. M Urhlrowwa. andM. Fujiwara
`“811ml" Chip Set for ID(lb/s Optical Receiver ..... . . ..
`............... T Sumki. M Soda, T Moritawa. II. Term. C. (browns Fajita. II. Takemura.andT. Toalrlm I?!“
`1.11 OH; I.4 Regenerating Demultiplexer with Bit-Rotation Control and 6.l-GH1 Autolatching Phnae~Aligtter lC‘s
`_
`lliung AlGuAs/GuAa HBT Technology... ............. ...... .................. .. ............
`..........................
`.M. Bagheri. K.-C. Wang. M-C. F 011mg. R. B. NuhlingJ’. M. Asked. 0114A. Chm 1781
`’
`3 1nW l.O-GHI. SiliconECL Dual-Modulus Pnescaler lC............................................. ....
`.
`...........................................
`M M14010. I! Starr/11'. M. Ogawa. K Sara. and”. Ichitmwr
`51 Bipolar 280R: Dynamic Frequency Divider ............................................................... .. .
`..................... M. Karim. G Uemura. M. Olmclu'. C. 0mm. H Takemara T. Morikmm. andT.TaKI11'm l799
`'l \\t)—Chlp l .S-GBd Serial Link Interface
`lllOS ,
`............................ R. C. Walker. C. L. Smut. J.-T. Wu. 8. L111. C.-S Yen. T. Ramakoud P. T. Perrwu')
`1 Experimental S-Gh/a l6 :1 l6 Si—Bipolar Outspoint Switch.. ............. .... ...... H.J.Slu'n and M. J. lmdiaro l8|2
`
`l747
`
`‘
`
`1752 .
`'
`1763“
`
`1175
`
`I794
`
`(Commit continued on bad mien
`
`SAMSUNG EX. 1008.— 1/12 "
`
`

`

`IEEE JOURNAL OF Soup-Sn": CtRcurrs is published by the IEEE Solid-State Circuits Council on behalf of the following Groups/Societies: S-Circuits and System.
`S-Cotnmunications. S-Computer. S-Electron Devices. S-Mtcrowave Theory and Techniques. S-Components. Hybrids. and Manufacturing Technology. S-Ultrasonicl.
`Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control. and S-Lasers and Electro-Optics. Members of sponsoring IEEE Soctcties may subscnbe to this JOURNAL for $14.00 per year.
`For information on receiving this JOURNAL. write to the IEEE Service Center at the address below. Member copies of TI‘tIIl.WIL'ille/Jtlllt‘ltulx nrefur perm/ml use only“
`SOLID-STATE CIRCUITS COUNCIL
`Treasurer
`Vice-President
`Secretory
`R. G. SWARTZ
`H. E. MUSSMAN
`E. E. SWARTZLANDER. JR.
`ATdt’l‘ Bell Labs.
`MS 48
`Dept. Elec. & Comp. Eng.
`Room 48-334
`GTE Labs. Inc.
`Univ. of Texas
`40 Sylvan Rd.
`Austin. TX 78712
`Crawfords Corner Rd;
`Holmdcl. NJ 07733
`Wallhatn. MA 02254
`FAX: (512) 471-5907
`FAX: (908) 949-8938
`FAX: (617) 890-9320
`Representatives
`
`IEEE JOURNAL OF SOLID-STATE CIRCUITS
`
`Presldent
`P. VcRHOPserr
`Semiconductor Research Corp.
`79 Alexander Dr.. Bldg. 4401
`PD. Box 12053
`Research Triangle Park. NC 27709
`FAX: (919) 541-9450
`
`s-CAs
`D. 0. PEDERSON
`EECS. Cory Hall
`Univ. 01' Califomin
`Berkeley. CA 94720
`
`W. MALY
`Elec. Eng. Dept.
`Carnegie Mellon Univ.
`Schenley Park
`Pittsburgh. PA 152I3
`s-chT
`O. EKNOYAN
`Elec. Eng. Dept.
`Texas A&M Univ.
`College Station. TX 77843
`L. J. PALKUTI
`Headquarters DNA. RAEE
`6001 Telegraph Rd.
`Alexandria. VA 22310
`
`s-ED
`s—c
`s-COM
`K. J. O'CONNOR
`D. BOULDIN
`D. RIBNEI
`AT&T Bell Labs.
`Elec. & Comput. Eng.
`Corporate R&D
`‘i Room 33107
`Univ. of Tennessee
`General Electric Co.
`420 Ferris Hall
`555 Union Blvd.
`KWC-524. P.O. Box 8
`Allentown. PA 18103
`Knoxville. TN 37996-2101)
`Schenectady. NY 12301
`C. (5. 80mm
`M. G. SMITH
`V. CUPERMAN
`Dept. EECS. Rooin 39-527A
`IBM Research Center
`School of Eng. Science
`60 Vassar Street
`P.0. Box 218
`Simon Fraser Univ.
`Burnaby. BC. Canada VSA 186 Yorktown Heights. NY 10598 Mass. Inst. of Technology
`Cambridge. MA 02139
`ctcc
`R. A. Minute
`Vitessc Semiconductor Corp.
`741 Cnllc Plano
`Camarillo. CA 93010
`ASIA
`H. ISHIKAWA
`Fujitsu Labs. Ltd.
`10-1 Morinosato-Wnkamiya
`Atsugi. 243-01 Japan
`IEEE JOURNAL OI" SOLID—STATE CIRCUITS
`
`s-urrc
`T. R. MEEKER
`AT&T Bell Labs.
`555 Union Blvd.
`Allentown. PA 18103
`L. '1‘. CLAIBORNE
`920 Northlake
`Richardson. TX 75080
`
`s-LEO
`J. F. MCDONALD
`Rensselaer Polytechnic Inst.
`CII. Room 6112
`Troy. NY 12181
`TnAN VAN Muot
`PCO. Inc.
`20200 Sunburst St.
`Chatsworth. CA 9l3ll
`
`-
`
`s-Mn
`R. SUDnon
`M.1.T. Lincoln Lab.
`244 Wood St.
`MS-KB-JSII
`Lexington. MA 02173-9108
`D. P. HonNnuctth
`Microwave Technology Div , Bldg. us.
`Hewlett-Packard
`I412 Fountaingrove Pkwy.
`Santa Rosa. CA 95:03
`Isscc EXEC. COMM. CHAIRMAN
`W. D. Ptucmt
`A21/965-2
`IBM General Technology Div.
`Essex Junction. VT 05452
`EUROPE
`E. Vtrroz
`CSEM Maladicrc 7|
`2000 Neuchatel 7
`Switzerland
`
`Eonoti
`A. A. All")!
`Elec. Eng. Dept.
`Room 56-1251!
`Engineerin IV
`Urtiv. of Cal' ornia
`”$1503? C"
`Tel.: (310 zoo-toss
`FAX: (31 )206-8495
`
`R. APFEL
`PD. Box 18808
`Austin. TX 78760
`FAX: (5l2) 462-5101
`
`I. JENSEN
`Hughes Research Labs.
`MS RLSS
`30Il Malibu Canyon Rd.
`Malibu. CA 90265
`FAX: (213) 317-5483
`
`Associate Edltors____—.__——__'1
`H.-S. Lets
`W. SANSEN
`Room 39-553
`Dept. Electrotechnielt
`Mass. Inst. of Technology
`Katholiekc Univemteit Lettvetti
`Afdeling E.S.A.T.
`60 Vassar St.
`Kartlinaal Mercierlaan 94
`Cambridge, MA 02139
`3-3030 Leuven. Belgium
`FAX: (617] 253-0062
`FAX: 32-l6-221855
`S. WAABEN
`3461 LRWrenceville Rd.
`Princeton. NJ 08540
`
`itfii’il'émmuon
`LS! Division II—Semiconductor Group
`l-l. Shibaora l-Chorne
`MinRto-ku. Tokyo 105-01
`Ja
`n
`F X: 81-3-3457—1291
`
`EE'E‘i’B'iY
`570 Cor Elan
`Univ. 0 California
`Berkeley. CA 94720
`FAX: (415) 642-2739
`
`C. ANAGNOS‘I‘OPOULOS
`Microelectronics Tech. Div.
`Building 81. 6th floor. RL
`58m" “0“" C°-
`fiflf’ffigfifiéfiomfi
`'
`R. FLAxEtt
`A27/861-2
`IBM General Technology Div.
`Essex Junction. VT 05452—4299
`FAX: (002) 769-7437
`THE INSTITUTE 0|" ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS. INC.
`.
`Olllcers
`MERRILL W. BucttLev. Ja.. President
`Anvtn G. LARsON. Vicc Pratt/cut. Professional Activities
`1. T. CAIN. Vice President. Publication Activities
`MARTHA SLOAN. President—Elect
`KARSI’EN E. DRANGEID. Secretary
`Lots T. GANDIA. Vice President. Regional Activities
`MARCO W. MIOLIAito. Vice President. Standards Activities
`THEODORE W. HISSEY. Jit.. Treasurer
`FERNANDO ALDANA. Vice President. Technical Activities
`EDWARD A. PARRISH. Vice President. Educational Activities
`KENNETH R. LAKER. Director. Division l—Circitits and Devices
`Headquarters Stall
`ERIC HERZ. Executive Director
`JOHN H. Powcas. General Manager
`THOMAS W. BARTLETT. Associate General Manager—Finance and Administration
`WILLIAM D. CRAWLEY. Associate General Manager—Program:
`PETER A. LEWIS. Stafl‘ Director. Educational Activities
`DONALD CHRISTIANSEN. Editor. IEEE Spectrum
`MELVIN I. OLKEN. Stat] Director. Field Scrvlccs
`Iltvttm ENOELSON. .9th Director. Technical Activilies
`EDWARD ROSENBERG. Controller
`LEO FANNINO. Stqfl’Di‘rectar, Professional Activities
`ANDREW SALEM. Stair Director. Standards
`W. R. HAatNGREIrHt-zn. Stall" Director. Customer Service Center
`PHYLLIS HALL Stqfl' Director, Publishing Services
`
`Publlutlons Department
`Publication Managers: ANN H. BURGMEYER. GAIL S. FERENC
`Managing Editor: thtiAno C. DODENHOFF
`Senior Annotate Editor: EILEEN M. SLAvtN
`IEEE JOURNAL OF SOLID-STATE Ctncut'rs is published monthly by The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. Inc. Res
`gonsibilitzy for the contents rests upot'l.
`N 10017- 394. NY 'reie hone: 2i2-705
`the authors and not upon the IEEE. the Society/Council. or its members. IEEE Headguarters: 345 East 47th Street. New York.
`+ extension: Information -7900; General Manager -7910; Public Information .786
`: Publishing Services 4560: Spectrum 4556. Telecoplers: NY HeadqttnnetSI
`212-752-4929. NY (Publications 212-705-7682: NY Telex: 236-411 (international messages only). IEEE Service Center (for orders. subscriptions. address clump
`Educational Activities. Regio Section/Student Servmcs. Stnntlards): 445 Hoes Lane. PO. Box 1331. Piscatawuy. NJ 08855-133]. NJ Telethon:
`lnI'ortntttltlll
`Street. NW. Suitfl
`908-981-0060; 908-562 + extension: Controller 5365'. Technical Activities 8900. IEEE Washlnuton 001cc (for U.S. professional activities): 1828
`1202. Washin ton, DC 20036-5104. Washlnflon Telephone: 202-785-0017. Price/Publication Inlbrmatlon: Individual co ies: IEEE members $10.00 (first copy only).
`nonmembers 20.00 per co y. (Note: Add
`.
`.
`:00 postage and handling char e to any order from $1.00 to 550.00. inclu ing prepaid orders.) Member and nonmembltl‘l
`subscription prices availab e on request. Available in microfiche and micro In. Co yrtght and Reprint Permisslnns: Abstracting is
`permitted with credit to the source--
`rivate use of patrons: 1) those
`IP
`post-1977 articles that carry a code at the bottom'
`Libraries are permitted to photocopy beyond the limits of the U.S. Copyri
`t Law or
`of the first age. provided the per-copy fee indicated in the code is paid t oogh the
`ogyright Clearance Center. 29 Congress Street. Salem. MA 01970: 2) pre-Im‘
`articles wit out fee. For all other co ytng. reprint. or republication permission. write to
`tépyrights nnd Permissions Department. IEEE. Publishing Services. 445 HO“
`lectrical and Electronics Engineers. Inc. All rights reserved. Second-c
`Lane. P.O. Box 1331. Piscataway.
`J 08855-1331. Copyright 0 1992 by The Institute of
`Ezstage paid at New York. NY and at additional mailing offices. Postmaster: Send address changes to IEEE JOURNAL OF SOLID-STATE CIRCUITS. IEEE. 445 H09I
`
` ne. PO. Box 1331. Piscntaway. NJ 08855—1331. 681‘ Registration No. 125634l88.
`
`SAMSUNG EX. 1008 - 2i
`
`

`

`IEIEE JOURNAL OF SOLID-STATE CIRCUITS. VOL 27. NO.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`l2. DECEMBER I992
`
`
`
`
`
`[833
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Polysilicon TFT Circuit Design and Performance
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Alan G. Lewis, Senior Member. IEEE, David D. Lee, Member, IEEE, and Richard H. Bruce, Member, IEEE
`
`
`
`.-—-._——-.._.J.-——-—-—-—~__-g-a--q-_—
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Abstmcr—Polysilicon thin-film technology is becoming in-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`creasingly attractive for active-matrix liquid-crystal displays
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(AMLCD’s) and other large-area electronic devices, primarily
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`because polysilicon thin-film transistors (TFT’s) can be used to
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`build integrated drive and interface circuitry on large-area
`substrates. Both n- and p-channel polysilicon TFT’s can be fab-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ricated, allowing CMOS circuit techniques to be used. How-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ever, TFT characteristics are poor in comparison to conven-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`tional single-crystal MOSFET'S, and relatively coarse design
`rules must be used to be compatible with processing on large-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`area glass plates {more than 30 cm X 30 cm}, and these limi-
`tations present a number of challenges for circuit design. This
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`paper examines these issues and describes the performance of
`a range of digital and analog circuit elements built using poly-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`silicon TFT’s. Digital circuit speeds in excess of 20 MHz are
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`reported, along with operational amplifiers with over 80 dB of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`gain and more than l-MHz unity-gain frequency. Several poly-
`silicon TFT switched-capacitor circuits are also reported and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`shown to have adequate linearity, output swing, and settling
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`time to form integrated data line drivers on an AMLCD.
`
`
`
`
`I.
`
`
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`NTEREST in circuits built using polysilicon thin-film
`
`
`
`
`
`
`transistors {TFT‘s} has recently increased for several
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`reasons. Although the inferior performance of these de-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`vices in comparison to conventional single-crystal MOS—
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`FET’s is well documented [l]—[41, they have the impor-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`tant advantage of being compatible with fabrication on
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`large-area glass or quartz substrates (more than 30 cm X
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`30 cm). This makes TFT’s usable in applications where
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the physical size of the circuit must be large, for example
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`if the circuit
`is an active-matrix liquid—crystal display
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(AMLCD) [41—[6], a page-width optical scanner ['3'], 18]
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`or a page-width print head [9]. Although there have been
`
`
`
`
`
`
`many reports of particular devices incorporating polysil-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`icon TFT's and TFT circuits [4]—[8], there has been little
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`work published so far concentrating specifically on the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`underlying design issues and performance capabilities of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`polysilicon TFT circuits. This paper, like the ISSCC pres-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`entations on which it expands [2], [10],
`is intended to-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`focus on these subjects. The work described here does not
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`deal with a complete large-area polysilicon TFT elec—
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`tronic device, but rather examines the performance of a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`range of basic circuit elements, some of which are already
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`used in applications, and some of which show promise for
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`increased functionality on large-area substrates in the fu-
`ture.
`
`
`Manuscript received May 26, 1992'. revised August 20, 1992.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The authols are with Xerox Palo Allo Research Center, Palo Alto. CA
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`94304.
`
`IEEE Log Number 9204 ISO.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The most common, and the most important, application
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`of polysilicon TFT’s remains AMLCD’s. As the various
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`circuit elements are discussed in this paper,
`therefore,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`their performance will be compared with AMLCD driving
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`requirements. In order to do this, typical drive circuits for
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`AMLCD‘s are briefly reviewed in Section IV. It should
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`be noted, however, that there are other applications for
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`these devices, and more are likely to present themselves
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`as the technology matures and TFT circuit performance
`
`improves.
`
`ll. POLYSILICON THIN-FILM TECHNOLOGY
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the main features of polysilicon thin-
`In this section,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`film technologies are reviewed. Fig.
`1 shows cross sec—
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`tions of n— and p—channel polysilicon TFT’s along with an
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`integrated capacitor. The TFT‘s themselves are very sim-
`
`
`
`
`
`ilar to single-crystal silicon-on-insulator (SOI) MOS—
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`F-ET's, except that the active silicon layer is polycrystal—
`
`
`
`
`
`
`line instead of monocrystalline. Polysilicon technology
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`also has several of the advantages of 801, including ex-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`cellent interdevice isolation and negligible parasitic ca-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`pacitance. The capacitor is formed between the gate and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`active polysilicon layers by the addition of a single im-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`plant to dope the active polysilicon layer under the gate.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The structure is similar in layout to a polysilicon—to—dif—
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`fusion capacitor in a conventional single—crystal MOS
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`technology, but in this case there is negligible parasitic
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`capacitance associated with either electrode. Both plates
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`of the capacitor can be sufficiently heavily doped that the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`series resistance remains low, and the capacitance does
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`not vary significantly over the bias ranges typically found
`
`
`
`in large-area devices.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`There are several broad types of polysilicon TFT tech—
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`nology, differentiated by the annealing process used to
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`crystallize the active polysilicon layer and the maximum
`
`
`
`
`
`
`processing temperature used [3], [l l]. High-temperature
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`technologies typically use furnace annealing, and at least
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`one high~temperature process step (often during the gate
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`dielectric formation), and this restricts the choice of sub-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`strate material to quartz. Furnace annealed low-tempera—
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ture technologies use a similar process to the high—tem—
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`perature technologies, but keep the maximum processing
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`temperature less than about 600°C in order to allow the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`use of lower cost glass substrates. A third technology
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`variant uses laser annealing to achieve recrystallization
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`and is also compatible with low-cost glass substrates. The
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`laser annealed polysilicon TFT’s have been shown to of-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`fer the bcst performance, although the technology is not
`
`DOW-92008250330 (9 $992 [BEE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`SAMSUNG EX. 1008 - 3/12
`
`SAMSUNG EX. 1008 - 3/12
`
`

`

`l834
`
`IEEE JOURNAL OF SOLID-STATE CIRCUITS. VOL. 27, NO. 12. DECEMBER I992
`
`Capacitor
`polysilicon
`9'“
`
`
`Bottom
`Top
`
`NMOS TFT
`
`PMOS TFT
`
`
`
`
`p+
`l1+
`n+
`
`
`
`active polysilicon island
`Quartz substrate
`
`
`Fig. l. Polysilicon TFT‘s with integrated capacitor.
`
`yet mature and poor consistency and uniformity remain
`significant problems. High-temperature quartz-based
`technologies are relatively mature, offer good TFT per—
`formance, and are used for small viewfinder or projection
`displays. Low-temperature glass-based technologies offer
`low cost, although the TFT performance is not usually as
`good as can be achieved with high-temperature technol-
`ogies [12].
`The results reported in this paper were obtained using
`relatively conventional high- and low-temperature fur—
`nace recrystallized polysilicon thin—film devices fabri-
`cated at Xerox PARC. The experimental circuits were
`fabricated on quartz wafers, although the process condi-
`tions and design rules are the same as those used with
`large-area substrates. The device performance achieved is
`comparable with the best reported for similar technologies
`by other authors [1],
`[4]—[8],
`[11]. Although, as dis-
`cussed below, the TFT characteristics are inferior to con-
`
`ventional single—crystal MOSFET‘s, useful circuit per-
`formance can still be achieved. As
`laser annealed
`
`technologies mature, even greater circuit functionality is
`likely to become possible.
`The circuits reported below were all designed using
`layout rules that are relatively coarse in comparison with
`those used in single-crystal technologies. There are sev-
`eral reasons for this. First, of course, are the photolitho-
`graphic and processing restrictions imposed by the need
`to fabricate the TFT’s on very large-area substrates. Sec-
`ond, short-channel effects are relatively severe in polysil-
`icon TFT’s, particularly at high drain voltages [13].
`Third, most large-area devices are constrained to operate
`at supply voltages of at least 15 V; an AMLCD pixel, for
`example, typically requires a total voltage swing of about
`10 V to encompass both drive polarities [14], and‘ with
`sufficient headroom to achieve this using polysilicon TFT
`drivers means a supply voltage of about 15 V.
`
`111. POLYSILICON TFT CHARACTERISTICS
`
`Fig. 2 shows simple l—V characteristics for n- and
`p-channel TFT’s fabricated using the high-temperature
`process; devices fabricated with the low-temperature
`technology are qualitatively similar although the drive
`currents are lower. The poor saturation arises through a
`similar mechanism to that responsible for the kink effect
`in 801 MOSFET’s [15], that is, channel avalanche mul-
`tiplication occurring in the high-field region near the drain
`combined with the floating body of the device. However,
`
`
`
` Drain bias
`
`(2!)
`
`(b)
`
`Fig. 2. High-temperature polysilicon TFT characteristics (W = 50 pm, L
`= 10 pm). (a) NMOS. (b) PMOS.
`
`in polysilicon TFT’s there is an additional mechanism re
`lated to the high trap state density that exaggerates the
`effect of avalanche multiplication still further [16]. Since
`the poor saturation characteristics are not
`related to
`punchthrough or other breakdown effects,
`the off-state
`current is not affected. The impact on digital circuits is
`only minor, and the extra drain current even increases
`switching speeds slightly. However,
`the low output
`impedance presents a greater problem for analog circuit
`design where high impedances are needed to achieve good
`voltage gain.
`The main weakness of polysilicon TFT‘s in comparison
`with single-crystal devices is their relatively low drive
`current, particularly in low-temperature devices. This can
`be seen from Fig. 2, and is further illustrated in Fig. 3
`where the effective channel mobility is plotted as a func-
`tion of normalized gate bias for both an n-channel poly-
`silicon TFT and a conventional 2-p.m gate length MOS—
`FET.
`In each case the gate bias is normalized by the
`typical operating voltage for circuits built using the de-
`vices, 5 V for the MOSFET and 15 V for the polysilicon
`TFT. The peak MOSFET mobility is observed at a gate
`bias a little above threshold, and the degradation at higher
`gate bias is caused by increased surface scattering as the
`channel inversion layer is compressed by the increasing
`gate field. The TFT mobility is about an order of magni—
`tude lower, and increases steadily as the gate drive rises
`until it saturates at a gate voltage of about 10 V; both the
`lower effective channel mobility and the gate bias de-
`pendence are due to the high trap state density in the de-
`vice channel. The low drive current of the polysilicon
`TFT’s has a significant effect on digital circuit speed, but
`in the analog case the effect is even more severe since
`transistors in amplifiers are typically biased with a low
`V05 to keep VDSAT low, and as Fig. 3 shows, under such
`conditions the effective TFT mobility is well below its
`peak value.
`Another important device characteristic, particularly for
`analog circuit applications, is the noise performance. and
`in this respect polysilicon TFT’s are again markedly in-
`ferior to single-crystal devices. Typical noise figures for
`polysilicon TFT’s are about an order of magnitude higher
`than for conventional MOSFET’s; at low frequencies (less
`than about 100 kHz) flicker noise dominates and shows
`roughly the same channel size dependence seen with
`MOSFET’S. At higher frequencies. thermal noise domi-
`nates. The noise performance of polysilicon TFT’s has
`
`SAMSUNG EX. 1008 - 4/12
`
`

`

`LEWIS t! al.: POLYSlLICON TFT CIRCUIT DESIGN AND PERFORMANCE
`
`I 835
`
`Effective channel mobility (cmzv'1s")
`500
`
`tion, good noise immunity, and the difficulty in fabricat-
`ing depletion-mode NMOS devices to act as loads.
`
`$00
`
`‘00
`
`300
`
`200
`
`100
`
`MOSFET (Von: SV)
`
`IV. DRIVE REQUIREMENTS FOR AMLCD‘s
`
`This section reviews the main driving requirements for
`AMLCD’s. These displays represent the major applica-
`tion area for polysilicon TFT’s, and their drive require-
`ments will be used to add perspective to the measured
`performance described below. Fig. 4 shows the main cir-
`cuit elements of an AMLCD along with typical drive
`waveforms. The active matrix is composed of orthogonal
`scan and data lines, and a single pixel is formed at each
`intersection. Each pixel contains a TFT and a capacitor.
`The capacitor is formed by a pair of transparent electrodes
`sandwiching the liquid-crystal material. Plane polarizers
`are placed on each side of the cell so that incoming light
`is first polarized, then passes through the liquid crystal,
`and finally leaves via the second polarizer. The voltage
`applied to the capacitor controls the orientation of the liq-
`uid—crystal molecules, and this in turn controls the twist
`in the plane of polarization of the light traveling through
`the cell. In this way. the transmission oflight through the
`entire module (liquid-crystal cell and polarizers) can be
`controlled [14]. When a scan line goes high, each TFT
`along that line is turned on and the voltages present on
`the data lines are transferred in parallel into all the pixels
`along that line, setting the required transmission pattern.
`When the scan line goes low again, the TFT is turned off,
`the charge remains on the pixel capacitance, and the pixel
`voltage remains fixed until it is rewritten during the next
`frame. The liquid-crystal capacitance is strongly voltage
`dependent and may not be large enough to store the pixel
`voltage until
`the next frame (charge can leak off both
`through the TFT and the liquid-crystal material), and in
`practice an additional storage capacitor is often added to
`the pixel to improve the storage time and linearity.
`Conventional amorphous-silicon TFT AMLCD‘s use
`single-crystal
`integrated circuits to generate the drive
`waveforms illustrated in Fig. 4. A full-color 640 X 480—
`pixel display requires about a dozen chips, and several
`thousand individual connections must be made between
`the active matrix substrate and the driver IC’s. The driver
`
`[C‘s and the very large number of connections contribute
`significantly to the cost of the display. and also play an
`important role in determining long-tenn reliability. The
`use of polysilicon TFT’s allows the driver circuits to be
`fabricated simultaneously with the active matrix on the
`same glass substrate, eliminating the need for external
`driver chips and greatly reducing the number of external
`connections needed to operate the display. In addition,
`integrated drivers allow much denser displays to be built,
`offering the possibility of physically small but high-pixel-
`count light valves for projection applications [18].
`The function of the scan drivers is to generate the scan
`pattern, turning each scan line on in turn. This is usually
`accomplished by a simple shift register and buffers to drive
`the capacitive load presented by the scan lines. As Fig. 4
`
`SAMSUNG EX. 1008 — 5/12
`
`Fig. 3. Polysilicon TFT and single crystal MOSFET channel mobility. VD;
`= 0.1 V. n-channel.
`
`Vas/ Von
`
`TABLE I
`TECHNOLOGY COMPARISON
`
`Low-temperature High-temperature Conventional
`poly-Si TFT
`poly—Si TFT
`MOSFET
`
`NMOS: V, (V)
`[1(ch .
`v '
`~ s
`
`')
`
`PMOS: V, (V)
`,1 (cm’ '
`V‘I ' 5")
`
`2
`40
`
`—8
`20
`
`z
`mo
`
`'3
`so
`
`0.7
`500
`
`-0.7
`200
`
`Operating voltage (V)
`Feature size (pm)
`Substrate
`
`18
`5
`LA glass
`
`IS
`S
`LA quartz
`
`5
`l
`Si wafer
`
`been discussed elsewhere [10], [17], and is not consid-
`ered further here, except to note that since the frequency
`dependence is qualitatively similar to that obtained with
`conventional MOSFET‘s,
`the same switched-capacitor
`techniques used to suppress low-frequency noise in these
`devices are expected to be equally effective with TFT’s.
`Table I summarizes some of the main characteristics of
`
`polysilicon TFT's and compares them with typical values
`for conventional single-crystal MOSFET’s. Data are
`shown for both low- and high-temperature processed
`TFT’s. The low-temperature NMOS TFT’s have lower
`channel mobility, and hence lower drive current, than their
`high-temperature counterparts, but otherwise are similar.
`However, the difference between low- and high-temper-
`ature p-channel TFT’s is more marked. Not only is the
`channel mobility lower in the low-temperature device, but
`the threshold voltage is also much more negative, so that
`the drive current available from a
`low-temperature
`p-channel TFT is more than an order of magnitude lower
`than that available from a high-temperature device [12].
`Despite the weak p-channel TFT's in the low-temperature
`technology, CMOS circuits are still often used for several
`reasons, including design simplicity, low power dissipa-
`
`

`

`l836
`
`IEEE JOURNAL OF SOLID-STATE CIRCUITS. VOL. 27. NO.
`
`[2. DECEMBER I992
`
`
`
`W Datadrivers /%
`
`V‘V‘V‘V‘V‘V‘V‘V‘V‘V‘V‘V
`
`
`km...
`Shift register}5“" circuit
`(b)
`(a)
`Fig. 4. AMLCD driving. (a) Main circuit elements of AMLCD. (b) Typ—
`ical drive waveforms.
`
`tqu= 355:5 (480 lines)
`16us (1024 lines)
`
`indicates, the total voltage swing needed on the gate lines
`is around 15 V; the scan frequency depends on the display
`size and video format, and is about 30 kHz for a progres-
`sive scan 480-line display and about 60 kHz with l024
`lines. The scan line buffer rise and fall times usually need
`to be around 1 us, although this depends somewhat on the
`display design and resolution. The capacitive load pre-
`sented by a scan line can be very large, ranging from about
`50 pF for a small projection display to as much as 500 pF
`for a large direct-view high—resolution display, and
`achieving fast enough transition times when driving such
`loads often requires very large buffers.
`The data driver circuits are often even more challeng-
`ing. They must perform serial-to-parallel conversion and
`drive the appropriate analog voltages onto the data lines.
`The voltage applied to the liquid-crystal cells must have
`a time—average value close to zero to prevent deterioration
`of the display, and to achieve this the voltage applied to
`each pixel is reversed every frame. The data driver volt-
`age swing must be large enough to accommodate both
`drive polarities, normally requiring a total swing of about
`10 V. The output settling time for the data drivers must
`be fast enough that once the data lines have reached their
`final values there is still time to transfer the signals into
`the pixels. In the case of polysilicon pixel TFT’s, this
`transfer takes only a few microseconds [12], giving target
`settling times of about 30 as for a 480-line display and
`about 12 as with l024 lines. The data-line capacitance is
`usually smaller than the scan-line capacitance, usually be-
`tween about 20 pF for a small projection display and about
`100 pF for a high-resolution direct-view display.
`Fig. 5 illustrates two common data driver architectures.
`In the second [4], [6] (Fig. 5 (b)), analog video data are
`distributed along a common input line, which is linked
`via pass gates to the matrix data lines. The shift register
`turns each pass gate on in turn, and the analog input volt-
`age present at that moment is transferred to the data line,
`where it remains stored on the data-line capacitance once
`the pass gate turns off. The rate at which data can be sam-
`pled from the analog input depends on the speed of the
`shift register generating the sample signals, and the speed
`
`
`

`
`digital
`data in
`
`l'l
`
`matrix data lines
`
`(a)
`
` Shift register
`
` - .'
`
`matrix data lines
`
`0?)
`
`Fig. 5. AMLCD data driver architectures.
`
`with which the data line can be charged via the pass gate;
`usually the latter limitation is the most severe. Normally,
`a separate analog input line is used for each color (red,
`green, blue), and on a large display several sets of input
`lines may be employed, each serving only a fraction of
`the data lines, in order to achieve the necessary data band-
`width. In the first architecture [5] (Fig. 5(a)). serial dig-
`ital data are fe

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket