Case 1:13-cv-00919-JLH Document 448 Filed 03/31/23 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 48487
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`VERDICT FORM
`
`Instructions: When answering the following questions and completing this Verdict
`
`Form, please follow the directions provided and follow the Jury Instructions that you have been
`
`given. Your answer to each question must be unanimous. Some of the questions contain legal
`
`terms that are defined and explained in the Jury Instructions. Please refer to the Jury Instructions
`
`if you are unsure about the meaning or usage of any legal term that appears in the questions
`
`below.
`
`As used herein:
`
`1. “Arendi” refers to Plaintiff Arendi S.A.R.L.;
`
`2. “Google” refers to Defendant Google LLC; and
`
`3. The “’843 Patent” refers to U.S. Patent No. 7,917,843.
`
`A. Direct Infringement
`Question No. 1A – Computer-Readable Medium Claims – Google Chrome Used With
`Content Detectors and Contextual Search Quick Actions:
`Did Arendi prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that Google directly infringed any of the
`
`following computer-readable medium claims of the ’843 Patent by its use of Google Chrome with
`
`“Content Detectors” and “Contextual Search Quick Actions”?
`
`“Yes” is a finding in favor of Arendi.
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`
`
`
`
`C.A. No. 13-919-JLH
`
`
`
`)))))))))
`
`
`
`ARENDI S.A.R.L.,
`
`
`
`
`
`GOOGLE LLC,
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`VERDICT FORM
`
`Instructions: When answering the following questions and completing this Verdict
`
`Form, please follow the directions provided and follow the Jury Instructions that you have been
`
`given. Your answer to each question must be unanimous. Some of the questions contain legal
`
`terms that are defined and explained in the Jury Instructions. Please refer to the Jury Instructions
`
`if you are unsure about the meaning or usage of any legal term that appears in the questions
`
`below.
`
`As used herein:
`
`1. “Arendi” refers to Plaintiff Arendi S.A.R.L.;
`
`2. “Google” refers to Defendant Google LLC; and
`
`3. The “’843 Patent” refers to U.S. Patent No. 7,917,843.
`
`A. Direct Infringement
`Question No. 1A – Computer-Readable Medium Claims – Google Chrome Used With
`Content Detectors and Contextual Search Quick Actions:
`Did Arendi prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that Google directly infringed any of the
`
`following computer-readable medium claims of the ’843 Patent by its use of Google Chrome with
`
`“Content Detectors” and “Contextual Search Quick Actions”?
`
`“Yes” is a finding in favor of Arendi.
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`
`
`
`
`C.A. No. 13-919-JLH
`
`
`
`)))))))))
`
`
`
`ARENDI S.A.R.L.,
`
`
`
`
`
`GOOGLE LLC,
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`Case 1:13-cv-00919-JLH Document 448 Filed 03/31/23 Page 2 of 8 PageID #: 48488
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`“No” is a finding in favor of Google.
`
`
`
`Claim 23
`
`Claim 30
`
`NO
`(for Google)
`
`YES
`(for Arendi)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Question No. 1B – Method Claims – Google Chrome Used With Content Detectors and
`Contextual Search Quick Actions:
`Did Arendi prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that Google directly infringed any of the
`
`following method claims of the ’843 Patent by performing every step of the claimed method using
`
`Google Chrome with “Content Detectors” and “Contextual Search Quick Actions”?
`
`“Yes” is a finding in favor of Arendi.
`
`“No” is a finding in favor of Google.
`
`
`
`Claim 1
`
`Claim 8
`
`NO
`(for Google)
`
`YES
`(for Arendi)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Question No. 1C – Computer-Readable Medium Claims – Applications Used With Smart
`Text Selection with Text Classifier:
`Did Arendi prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that Google directly infringed any of the
`
`following computer-readable medium claims of the ’843 Patent by its use of any of the accused
`
`applications with “Smart Text Selection with Text Classifier”?
`
`“Yes” is a finding in favor of Arendi.
`
`
`
`“No” is a finding in favor of Google.
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case 1:13-cv-00919-JLH Document 448 Filed 03/31/23 Page 3 of 8 PageID #: 48489
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Claim 23
`
`Claim 30
`
`NO
`(for Google)
`
`YES
`(for Arendi)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Question No. 1D – Method Claims – Applications Used With Smart Text Selection with
`Text Classifier:
`Did Arendi prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that Google directly infringed any of the
`
`following method claims of the ’843 Patent by performing every step of the claimed method using
`
`the accused applications with “Smart Text Selection with Text Classifier”?
`
`“Yes” is a finding in favor of Arendi.
`
`“No” is a finding in favor of Google .
`
`YES
`(for Arendi)
`
`NO
`(for Google)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Claim 1
`
`Claim 8
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case 1:13-cv-00919-JLH Document 448 Filed 03/31/23 Page 4 of 8 PageID #: 48490
`
`
`
`B. Invalidity
`Question No. 2A – Anticipation:
`Did Google prove by clear and convincing evidence, that any of the following claims of the ’843
`
`Patent are invalid as anticipated by prior art?
`
`
`
`
`
`“Yes” is a finding in favor of Google.
`
`
`
`“No” is a finding in favor of Arendi.
`
`NO
`(for Arendi)
`
`YES
`(for Google)
`
`
`
`Claim 1
`
`Claim 8
`
`Claim 23
`
`Claim 30
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Question No. 2B – Obviousness:
`Did Google prove, by clear and convincing evidence, that any of the following claims of the ’843
`
`Patent are invalid as obvious in view of prior art?
`
`“Yes” is a finding in favor of Google.
`
`
`
`“No” is a finding in favor of Arendi.
`
`YES
`(for Google)
`
`
`
`Claim 1
`
`Claim 8
`
`Claim 23
`
`Claim 30
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`NO
`(for Arendi)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`Case 1:13-cv-00919-JLH Document 448 Filed 03/31/23 Page 5 of 8 PageID #: 48491
`
`
`
`Question No. 2C – Written Description:
`Did Google prove, by clear and convincing evidence, that any of the following claims of the ’843
`
`Patent are invalid for lack of written description in the specification of the ’843 Patent?
`
`
`
`
`
`“Yes” is a finding in favor of Google.
`
`
`
`“No” is a finding in favor of Arendi.
`
`NO
`(for Arendi)
`
`YES
`(for Google)
`
`
`
`Claim 1
`
`Claim 8
`
`Claim 23
`
`Claim 30
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Question No. 2D – Enablement:
`Did Google prove, by clear and convincing evidence, that any of the following claims of the ’843
`
`Patent are invalid for lack of enablement by the specification of the ’843 Patent?
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`“Yes” is a finding in favor of Google.
`
`
`
`“No” is a finding in favor of Arendi.
`
`
`
`Claim 1
`
`Claim 8
`
`Claim 23
`
`Claim 30
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`YES
`(for Google)
`
`NO
`(for Arendi)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`
`
`Case 1:13-cv-00919-JLH Document 448 Filed 03/31/23 Page 6 of 8 PageID #: 48492
`
`
`
`If you answered “YES” for any claims in Question Nos. 1A through 1H and checked “NO”
`for any such claims in Question 2 (i.e., you determined that at least one claim is infringed
`and not invalid), proceed to Questions 3 and 4.
`
`Otherwise, skip and DO NOT answer Questions 3 and 4, and instead please proceed
`directly to the final page of this Verdict Form and sign and date that page.
`
`C. Damages
`Question No. 3:
`What amount of damages, if any, has Arendi proven by a preponderance of the evidence that it is
`
`entitled to as a reasonable royalty for Google’s infringement of the ’843 Patent?
`
`
`
`Answer: $ _________________________
`
`
`6
`
`
`
`Case 1:13-cv-00919-JLH Document 448 Filed 03/31/23 Page 7 of 8 PageID #: 48493
`
`
`
`D. Willfulness
`Question No. 4:
`Did Arendi prove by a preponderance of the evidence that Google’s infringement of any of the
`
`claims of the ’843 Patent was willful?
`
`“Yes” is a finding in favor of Arendi.
`
`“No” is a finding in favor of Google.
`
`Yes: _________________
`
`
`
`
` No: _________________
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`7
`
`
`
`Case 1:13-cv-00919-JLH Document 448 Filed 03/31/23 Page 8 of 8 PageID #: 48494
`
`
`
`
`
`You have now reached the end of the verdict form and you should review it to ensure that
`
`it entirely reflects your unanimous determinations. The Foreperson should then sign the verdict
`
`form in the space below and notify the Court Security Officer that you have reached a verdict. The
`
`Foreperson should retain possession of the verdict form and bring it to the courtroom with the jury.
`
`
`
`Signed: ____________________________________
`
`
`
`Dated: ___________________
`
`
`
`
`10713649
`
`8
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
