throbber
FORECLOSURE MEDIATCR'3
`REPDRT
`JDov-aa Rev. 7:13
`(3.6.8. B 49-.31h; RA. 13-186‘
`
`.
`
`STATE OF GQNNEGTICUT
`'EUPERIQR QQURT
`www.1ud.ot.gov
`
`'
`
`'
`
`" ‘OUR‘I‘Usc'oA/Ly '
`
`
`
`‘
`
`'
`
`.
`
`_
`
`'
`
`.
`
`7
`
`-
`
`,
`~
`
`-
`
`4
`
`'
`
`‘
`
`'
`
`_
`
`'
`
`.
`
`‘
`
`.
`
`.
`
`,
`
`Win—FEW
`
`'osketun or
`WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATIDN AS
`
`
`' “watt/2111a
`
`UW’YCV1 890399328
`,
`.
`?
`
`TRUSTEE V PETIQN FRANTZ
`
`
`uoioe Isin
`“amen Ve-Iaor
`
`Palmer5'3!
`
`'3 If 4 I'M, w E
`
`
`1.Did the parties engage in conduct consistent with the obieotlvee ofthemediation program?
`0 ‘2:
`co H m .4
`[:1 No lino. oXplalnzv
`-n E :3 % 2
`Plaintiff
`vYes
`Defendant
`Yes
`Ci No If no. explain:
`g E H 3% '“
`Did the parties pdssess theabllity to mediate? _
`Ft 1:
`C").
`:3 5%
`Plaintiff
`.. Yes
`[:1 No if no. explain:
`:3 EL;
`31
`o g
`Defendant
`vYes
`[:1 No if no explain:
`% :3 j E— C";
`2. Did the mortgagor submit a complete financial package to the mortgagee?
`1< ESE] toes )floj
`If no explain. jihey are applying for emap,
`—'
`‘ g -
`' 8
`3. What foreclosure alternative has the mortgagor requested?
`—'
`I Reinstatement
`'
`[J Loan modification
`[3 Repayment
`'
`E] Short Sale ‘
`[j Deed-InaLieu IIModlfioation of sale date/lawday
`4. Has the mortgagor been previously evaluated for a similar request?
`'
`lfyes. error to media-thong
`in mediationij
`If yes. has there been a change in circumstances since that evaluation?
`
`lfyes, explain. _??°_’P9,9_9?,
`‘
`5.Has themortgagee responded to the mortgagor's reduest?
`Deseriptlon of the responseo
`[:1 Approval
`E] Denial
`,
`I
`~
`Explain:
`-
`Is the mediator aware of anymateriel reason to disagree with that response?
`If yes, explain
`6. Has the mortgagor responded to the mortgagee'3 offer on a reasonably timely basis?
`.
`Explain:
`.
`>
`-
`1 7. Has the mortgagee requested additional information from the mortgagor?
`If yes, what are the stated reasons for the request and by what date must the
`information be submitted so that all financials will remain current?
`
`~
`._ .
`Yea Ihlo, '
`..
`.
`.
`_.
`Yes [:1 No
`._ .
`,,
`..
`.
`.
`.
`,
`,
`E] Yes-Noni E NotAeniioeble
`~
`'
`
`3
`
`.
`
`-
`
`-.
`
`"
`
`'
`
`Yes
`
`No
`
`E] Yes D No
`'
`'
`
`Not Applicable
`.
`-
`'13 Yes E No
`
`‘
`
`8. Has the mortgagor supplied on a reasonably timely basis, additional information reasonably
`requested by the mortgagee?
`if no. reason:
`
`.
`
`_
`
`_
`
`9 is information provided by the mortgagor still current for the mortgagee“a review?
`if no, list the out-of.date information and the reason it is no longer ourreht:
`10. Has the mortgageeprovided a reasonable explanation of a denial for the foreclosure alternative
`' ”9935'“?
`,
`Is themediator aware of any material reasons to disagree with the denial?
`if yes, explain:
`9
`'
`I
`11. Has the mortgagee complied with thestatutory time frames for responding to requests for decisions?
`
`.
`
`~
`
`-
`
`'
`
`[:I Yes [3 No
`Nat Apnlioablg
`
`- E Yes |:] No
`
`[:1 Yes [3 No
`NotApplieabie I
`[3 Yes [:i No _
`I
`I
`Yes E] No
`
`Jam/eat? Rev. 711,3
`
`‘
`
`Page 1 of 2
`
`10800
`
`

`

`uwvcv186039932$
`
`'
`
`.
`
`I
`
`Date Mad/anon Held: 59/124015
`
`12. Did the parties satisfy the expectations set forth in the previous report?
`Plaintiff
`Yes
`[3 No
`1:] Not Applicable
`Defendanfls)
`Yes _l:l No
`C] Not Applicable
`if no. explain:
`'
`'
`VYos E] No [:1 Don't Know
`Is a subsequent mediation session expectad to ooour?
`Beseribe the expectations‘«or each party both prior to and for the next mediation session if applicable:
`
`\
`
`.
`
`13 WIll the parties beneft from further mediation?
`Additional comments:
`
`[E YQS'E} No
`.
`V
`
`
`
`meme. Rev, 7.13 ,
`
`'
`
`Page :2 of:
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket