`REPORT
`JD-CV-89 Rev. 7-13
`
`C-G-S-“9'31”"’-A-13"36
`
`STATE OF CONNECTICUT
`SUPER|0R COURT
`www.jucl. ct. gov
`
`‘ameo
`
`ase
`
`WELLS FARGO BANK NATIONALASSOCIATION AS
`
`Doc et ‘umer
`
`‘
`
`'
`
`TRSUTEE V. PETION FRANTZ
`u-c1a lIer
`‘
`‘ameo V-eIator
`Waterbu
`Palmer Eo ler
`1. Did the parties engage in conduct consistent with the objectives of the mediation program?
`Plaintiff
`X Yes
`[:1 No If no, explain:
`Defendant
`E Yes
`E] No if no, explain:
`Did the parties possess the ability to mediate?
`Plaintiff
`Yes
`[:1 No if no, explain:
`Defendant
`E] Yes
`[:1 No If no, explain:
`
`»
`
`.
`
`.
`
`g-
`,
`
`COURT USE ONLY
`mm
`
`
`lllllllllllllllllllll
`
`.
`
`m
`
`,-;
`
`Mam: m '—4
`
`teem“—
`
`C m ‘j
`‘isjat‘I-eflail-nfielHfi—‘D— :.
`file/201:8)
`"1
`-
`Fr: 2; H g 3
`a 35 g o 2’:
`‘ g 33
`3— ‘2;
`—< 6 "C a 5-;
`4 :50)
`3
`
`2. Did the mortgagor submit a complete financial package to the mortgagee?
`If no, explain:
`3. What foreclosure alternative has the mortgagor requested?
`D Reinstatement
`vLoan modification
`E] Repayment
`[j Modification of sale date/law day
`E] Short Sale
`[:1 Deed-in-Lieu
`4. Has the mortgagor been previously evaluated for a similar request?
`if yes, prior to mediation
`ln mediation |:]
`If yes, has there been a change in circumstances since that evaluation?
`lfyes. explain: ???????????
`‘
`
`[2] Yes I:] No
`
`Yes [:I No
`
`D Yes [:1 No
`
`5. Has the mortgagee responded to the mortgagor's request?
`
`E] Yes X No D Not Applicable
`
`Description of the response:
`Explain:
`
`[:1 Approval
`
`D Denial
`
`Is the mediator aware of any material reason to disagree with that response?
`if yes, explain:
`
`[:1 Yes [:| No
`
`6. Has the mortgagor responded to the mortgagee's offer on a reasonably timely basis?
`Explain:
`'
`
`E] Yes X] No [:1 Not Applicable
`
`7. Has the mortgagee requested additional information from the mortgagor?
`if yes, what are the stated reasons for the request and by what date must the
`information be submitted so that all financials will remain current?
`
`'
`
`D Yes X No
`
`-
`
`8. Has the mortgagor supplied, on a reasonably timely basis, additional information reasonably
`requested by the mortgagee?
`If no, reason:
`9. Is information provided by the mortgagor still current for the mortgagee's review?
`If no, list the out-of date information and the reason it is no longer current:
`
`10. Has the mortgagee provided a reasonable explanation of a denial for the foreclosure alternative
`requested?
`.
`is the mediator aware of any material reasons to disagree with the denial?
`If yes, explain:
`
`Yes E] No
`El Not Applicable
`
`E Yes |:] No
`
`[I Yes El No
`E Not Applicable
`D Yes [:1 No
`
`11. Has the mortgagee complied with the statutory time frames for responding to requests for decisions? E Yes E] No
`If no, explain:
`
`JD-CV—89 Rev. 7-13
`
`Page 1 of2
`
`I6‘1
`
`
`
`UWYCV186039932S
`
`Date Mediation Held: 7/31/2018
`
`12. Did the parties satisfy the expectations set forth in the previous report?
`
`Plaintiff
`
`[:I Yes
`
`1:] No E Not Applicable
`
`[3 Yes
`
`[:1 No
`
`Defendant(s)
`If no, explain:
`g Yes [:1 No [:1 Don't Know
`Is a subsequent mediation session expebted to occur?
`Describe the expectations for each party both prior to and for the next mediation session, if applicable:
`
`IX] Not Applicable
`
`,
`
`13. VWI the parties benefit from further mediation?
`‘Additional comments:
`
`E Yes [:1 No
`
`rior settement a reement
`isa reed as to the tota amount owed because there was a
`Next med about 45 da 5. The arties
`MM
`
`e b
`r we said
`L.
`er said" had not, B _
`.
`1960consult with an attorney=
`
`
`to eac party to the
`This report was deliver
`
`
`
`(Date)
`Medlator‘s Signature
`
`
`
`JD-CV-89 Rev. 7-13
`
`Page 2 of2
`
`