`REPORT
`JDécgl-EL_3_}Q4IE)¢_3§)/ig1:3A 13—136
`0 ~
`'
`::
`
`STATE OF CONNECTICUT
`SUPERIOR COURT
`www.jud.ct.gov
`
`
`
`("Baumuse GNU/w]
`FMRPT
`MW....
`lllllllllllllllllllllll
`
`
`
`*'
`fiamffiwflt“%MWW'w'flfl"wbmWW”
`mm”
`Kampala
`om“?0.7m?GLEN5/2019
`WW
`_
`LNasgeljha Ortiz
`Middlesex
`WELLS_~ FARGO BANK, N.A. V. WILCQL CHERYL S
`MMXCV1860211398
`6/5/2018
`
`Judicmstn'éi
`mtfi'emato:
`‘BEEWW‘W‘
`
`1. Did the parties engage in conduct consistent with the objectives of the mediation progra
`03675651
`Plaintiff
`E Yes D No if no, explain:
`Defendant
`12 Yes
`D No if no, explain:
`AUG 1 5 2019
`Did the parties possess the ability to mediate?
`Plaintiff
`lg Yes
`E] No If no, explain:
`Defendant
`g Yes
`E] No If no, explain:
`2. Did the mortgagor submit a complete financial package to the mortgagee?
`
`Judicial District of Middlesex
`State Of Connecticut
`
`[Z] Yes [:1 No
`
`_
`
`If no, explain:
`3. What foreclosure alternative has the mortgagor requested?
`E] Reinstatement
`D Loan modification
`g Repayment
`[j Modification of sale date/law day
`[:1 Short Sale
`Cl Deed-in-Lieu
`4. Has the mortgagor been previously evaluated for a similar request?
`If yes, prior to mediation [:1
`In mediation E]
`If yes, has there been a change in circumstances since that evaluation?
`
`[:1 Yes g No
`
`[:1 Yes 2] No
`
`If yes, explain:
`5. Has the mortgagee responded to the mortgagor's request?
`Description of the response:
`(:l Approval
`[:l Denial
`Explain: The mortgagor will attemgt a short sale and if a short sale is successful the mgggegggggegwmgflygtisfiedi
`Is the mediator aware of any material reason to disagree with that response?
`[:1 Yes E No
`if yes, explain:
`
`6. Has the mortgagor responded to the mortgagee's offer on a reasonably timely basis?
`
`[3 Yes 1:] No Q Not Applicable
`
`[:1 Yes D No X Not Applicable
`
`Explain:
`
`7. Has the mortgagee requested additional information from the mortgagor?
`If yes, what are the stated reasons for the request and by what date must the
`information be submitted so that all financials will remain current?
`
`8. Has the mortgagor supplied, on a reasonably timely basis, additional information reasonably
`requested by the mortgagee?
`
`If no, reason:
`
`9. is information provided by the mortgagor still current for the mortgagee's review?
`If no, list the out-of date information and the reason it is no longer current:
`10. Has the mortgagee provided a reasonable explanation of a denial for the foreclosure alternative
`requested?
`is the mediator aware of any material reasons to disagree with the denial?
`
`El Yes [3 No
`
`1:] Yes E] No
`X] Not Applicable
`
`[:1 Yes E] No
`
`[:1 Yes [3 No
`[3 Not Applicable
`Cl Yes g No
`
`If yes, explain:
`
`11. Has the mortgagee complied with the statutory time frames for responding to requests for decisions?
`
`[E Yes [:1 No
`
`If no, explain:
`12. Did the parties satisfy the expectations set forth in the previous report?
`
`JD—CV-89 Rev. 7-13
`
`Page 1 of2
`
`9024. 01) JL
`%\ \s/llC,
`
`
`
`
`
`MMXCV186021139S
`
`Date Mediation Held: 8/15/2019
`
`if no, explain:
`
`Plaintiff
`1:] No
`D Yes
`[X Not Applicable
`Defendant(s)
`[:1 Yes D No
`IX Not Applicable
`E) Yes [3 No [:1 Don't Know
`is a subsequent mediation session expected to occur?
`Describe the expectations for each party both prior to and for the next mediation session, if applicable:
`Ine mofigagor Lg fist the property and to provide the short sate ggpfiwe‘ajlen4,9311? second mofigage holder for short sale
`mm13. N“ the parties benefit from further mediation?
`E Yes E] No
`
`Additional comments:
`Me i
`t‘ n
`iii be as neede
`
`sis.
`
`This report was delivered to each party to the mediation on:
`
`
`
`Mediator‘s
`'
`
`
`JD-CV-89 Rev. 7-13
`
`Page 2 of 2
`
`