`REPORT
`JD-CV—89 Rev. 7-13
`C.G.S. § 49-31n; P.A. 13-136
`
`STATE OF CONNECTICUT
`SUPERIOR COURT
`www.jud. ct. gov
`
`COURT USE ONLY
`FMRPT
`
`lllllllllllllllllllllll
`
`
`‘ ame of Case
`\‘ BERNSTEIN, SAMUEL J., TRUSTEE OF THE MAY
`MANAGEMEN V. VENTURA, FRANK, TRUSTEE OF THE
`KRYSTAL B. VENTURA
`
`u - rcra District
`
`Stamford
`
`
`
`
`1. Did the parties engage in conduct consistent with the objectives of the mediation program?
`Plaintiff
`E Yes
`D No If no, explain:
`
`Defendant
`
`g Yes
`
`D No If no,rexplain:
`
`Did the parties possess the ability to mediate?
`
`Plaintiff
`
`[3 Yes
`
`D No If no, explain:
`
`D No If no, explain:
`E Yes
`Defendant
`2. Did the mortgagor submit a complete financial package to the mortgagee?
`If no, explain: Not applicable.
`
`3. What foreclosure alternative has the mortgagor requested?
`
`E] Loan modification
`
`E Repayment
`
`E] Reinstatement
`
`E Short Sale
`
`E] Deed-in-Lieu
`
`|:] Modification of sale date/law day
`
`4. Has the mortgagor been previously evaluated for a similar request?
`
`In mediation [j
`if yes, prior to mediation [:I
`lfyes, has there been a change in circumstances since that evaluation? ‘
`
`If yes, explain:
`
`E] Yes E] No
`
`[:1 Yes IE No
`
`'DYesElNo
`
`5. Has the mortgagee responded to the mortgagor's request?
`
`[:I Yes D No
`
`X] Not Applicable
`
`Description of the response:
`
`E] Approval
`
`[3 Denial
`
`Explain:
`
`Is the mediator aware of any material reason to disagree with that response?
`If yes, explain:
`I
`
`[:1 Yes I: No
`
`6. Has the mortgagor responded to the mortgagee's offer on a reasonably timely basis?
`
`[I Yes D No
`
`12 Not Applicable
`
`Explain:
`
`7. Has the mortgagee requested additional information from the mortgagor?
`
`E] Yes [X] No
`
`If yes, what are the stated reasons for the request and by what date must the
`information be submitted so that all financials will remain current?
`
`8. Has the mortgagor supplied, on a reasonably timely basis, additional information reasonably
`requested by the mortgagee?
`
`D Yes E] No
`
`g NotApplicable
`
`if no, reason:
`
`9. is information provided by the mortgagor still current for the mortgagee's review?
`
`E] Yes 1:] No
`
`If no, list the out—of date information and the reason it is no longer current: Not applicable
`
`10. Has the mortgagee provided a reasonable explanation of a denial for the foreclosure alternative
`requested?
`
`is the mediator aware of any material reasons to disagree with the denial?
`
`If yes, explain:
`
`C] Yes E] No
`
`g NotApplicable
`
`E] Yes [3 No
`
`11. Has the mortgagee complied with the statutory time frames for responding to requests for decisions?
`
`12 Yes D No
`
`JD-CV-89 Rev. 7-13
`
`Page 1 of 2 .
`
`taloo
`
`
`
`FSTCV186038345S
`
`If no, explain:
`
`12. Did the parties satisfy the expectations set forth in the previous report?
`
`Plaintiff
`
`Defendant(s)
`
`If no, explain:
`
`X Yes D No
`
`C] NotApplicable
`
`[Z Yes D No
`
`C] NotApplicable
`
`Date Mediation Held: 11/22/2019
`
`I:] Yes E] No IX] Don't Know
`Is a subsequent mediation session expected to occur?
`Describe the expectations for Each party both prior to and for the next mediation session, if applicable:
`rovide number of
`Mort a ee rovided a offfi ure to mort a or. Mort a or is currentl
`seekin refinance. Mort a or will
`
`
`Institutions to which he a
`lied for refinance to mort a ee's counsel.
`13. Vlfill the parties benefit from further mediation?
`Additional comments:
`
`Yes [:I No
`
`>
`
`‘
`
`This report was delivered to each party to the mediation on:
`
`/
`
`4A,
`
`5 K
`
`H {73/ I
`(Date)
`
`’
`
`‘
`
`” I z
`
`z
`
`/
`
`/ 9
`
`Mediator's Signature
`
`'I
`
`(Date)
`
`JD-CV-89 Rev. 7—13
`
`‘
`
`.
`
`Page 2 of2
`
`