`
`.
`
`-
`
`STATE OF CONNECTICUT
`FORECLOSURE MEDIATOR'S
`SUPERng COURT
`REPORT
`WWW.jU .C .gov
`JD-CV-89 Rev. 7—13
`'
`_
`C-G-S-D49'31“;P-A-13136
`
`
`eturn Date
`Doc at Number
`W '
`
`FSTCV176031901S
`
`
`BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. V. MESZAROS MARY
`
`5/9/2017 .
`
`late V-elatron
`e -
`
`Judicial District
`Name_of Mediator
`10/17/2018
`Mario Dimonaco
`Stamford
`
`
`
`
`1. Did the parties engage in conduct consistent with the objectives of the mediation program?
`
`~.
`
`lllllllllllllllllllllllllllll
`
`Plaintiff
`
`IX] Yes
`
`C] No If no, explain:
`
`If no, explain:
`E] No
`Yes
`Defendant
`Did the parties possess the ability to mediate?
`
`Plaintiff
`
`X Yes
`
`1:] No
`
`If no, explain:
`
`if no, explain:
`E] Not
`[X] Yes
`Defendant
`2. Did the mortgagor submit a complete financial package to the mortgagee?
`
`If no, explain: Mortgagor recently submitted documents and the file is under review.
`
`3. What foreclosure alternative has the mortgagor requested?
`
`_
`
`'
`
`[I Yes E] No
`
`g Loan modification
`. E] Short Sale
`'
`
`|:| Repayment
`|:| Deed-in-Lieu
`
`[I Reinstatement'
`|:| Modification of sale date/law day
`
`~
`
`4. Has the mortgagor been previously evaluated for a similar request?
`
`if yes, prior to mediation |:]
`
`In mediation |:]
`
`If yes, has there been a change in circumstances since that evaluation?
`
`If yes, explain:
`5. Has the mortgagee responded to the mortgagor's request?
`
`Description of the response:
`Explain: See above.
`
`I
`
`.
`
`[:1 Approval
`
`|:] Denial
`’
`
`.
`
`Is the mediator aware of any material reason to disagree with that response?
`If yes, explain:
`6. Has the mortgagor responded to the mortgagee's offer on a reasonably timely basis?
`
`1
`
`Explain:
`7. Has the mortgagee requested additional information from the mortgagor?
`If yes, what are the stated reasons for the request and by what date must the-
`information be submitted so that all financials will remain current?
`
`'
`
`I
`
`CI Yes IE No
`
`|:] Yes E] No
`
`g Yes [:1 No [:1 Not Applicable
`
`'
`
`,
`
`|:| Yes |:] No
`
`I:] Yes [:1 No
`
`Not Applicable
`
`‘
`|:] Yes
`
`No,
`
`'
`
`g Yes [:1 N0
`El Not Applicable
`
`8. Has the mortgagor supplied, on a reasonably timely basis, additional information reasonably
`requested by the mortgagee?
`_
`If no, reason:
`
`9. Is information provided by the mortgagor still current for the mortgagee's review?
`If no, list the out—of date information and the reason it is no longer current:
`
`.
`
`Yes |:| No
`
`10. Has the mortgagee provided a reasonable explanation of a denial for the foreclosure alternative
`requeSted? ,
`.
`Is the mediator aware of any material reasons to disagree with the denial?
`If yes, explain:
`11. Has the mortgagee complied with the statutorytime frames for responding to requests for decisions? X Yes |:] No
`If no, explain:
`
`|:] Yes E] No
`E Not Applicable
`|:| Yes E] No
`
`12. Did the parties satisfy the expectations set forth in the previOus report?
`
`JD-CV-89 Rev: 7-13
`
`‘
`
`Page 1 of 2
`
`139.00
`
`

`

`L
`
`FSTCV1 7603 19018
`
`_
`
`Plaintiff
`Defendant(s)
`if no, explain:
`
`g Yes I: No »|:| Not Applicable
`Yes E] No
`|:] Not Applicable
`
`Date Mediation Held: 10/1 7/2018
`
`.
`
`ls a subsequent mediation session expected to occur?
`
`.
`
`[:1 Yes
`
`No C] Don't Know
`
`Describe the expectations for each party both prior to and for the next mediation session, if applicable:
`Mort a ee will com lete review and rovide a res onse.
`
`
`13. Vlfill the parties benefit from further mediation?
`Additional comments:
`
`.
`
`.
`
`' E] Yes E] No .
`
`This report was delivered to each party to the mediation on:
`'7
`
`’ H,
`(Date)
`
`C E‘
`
`U
`Mediatofs Signature 4
`
`‘
`
`Lot"? [c ?‘
`(Date)
`
`.
`
`
`
`
`
`JD-CVLBQ Rev. 7—13
`
`Page 2 of 2
`
`