`
`CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
`
`Case No.: CV l9-06301-AB (KSx)
`
`Date: August 27, 2020
`
`Title: Philips North America LLC v. Garmin International, Inc. et and Garmin Ltd.
`
`Present: The Honorable ANDRE BIROTTE JR., United States District Judge
`
`Carla Badirian
`
`Deputy Clerk
`
`N/A
`
`Court Reporter
`
`Attorney(s) Present for Plaintiff(s):
`
`Attorney(s) Present for Defendant(s):
`
`None Appearing
`
`None Appearing
`
`Proceedings:
`
`[In Chambers] Order DENYING Defendants’ Unopposed Request
`for Leave to File Supplemental Evidence (Dkt. No. 97)
`
`On August 25, 2020, Defendants Garmin International, Inc. et al. filed an
`Unopposed Request for Leave to File Supplemental Evidence. (Dkt. No. 97).
`Because Defendants assert that the proposed evidence applies to only one term,
`and because the Court finds that this evidence does not bear on the Court’s claim
`
`construction determination as to that term, the Court DENIES Defendants’
`Request as irrelevant to the Court’s consideration of the merits. See Basile v. Sony
`Pictures Entm ’t, 678 F. App’x. 473, 474 (9th Cir. 2017) (“[T]he district court did
`not abuse its discretion in failing to consider evidence irrelevant to the dispositive
`legal issue[-]”); Harris v. Vargo, No. 07—1654—ST, 2010 WL 147947, at *1 (D- Or.
`Jan. 11, 2010) (denying supplemental request to submit additional evidence
`“because such evidence is irrelevant” to the Court’s determination of the issue
`
`before it).
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`CV-90 (12/02)
`
`CIVIL NIINUTES — GENERAL
`
`Initials of Deputy Clerk Q
`
`l
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
