• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Active Filters1
85 results

Supercell Oy v. GREE, Inc.

Docket PGR2018-00029, Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Feb. 1, 2018)
Carl DeFranco, Hyun Jung, Lynne Browne, Michael Kim, presiding
Case TypePost Grant Review
Patent9636583
Patent Owner GREE, Inc.
Petitioner Supercell Oy
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

47 Order: GENERAL ORDER

Document PGR2018-00029, No. 47 Order - GENERAL ORDER (P.T.A.B. May. 21, 2020)
Before SCOTT R. BOALICK, Chief Administrative Patent Judge.
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (“Office”) has received from the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (“Federal Circuit”) numerous Orders that rely on the Federal Circuit’s decision in Arthrex, Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc., 941 F.3d 1320 (Fed. Cir. 2019).
Several parties in Board matters that have been subject to such Orders have informed the Office that they intend to seek review of the pertinent Order by the Supreme Court of the United States (“Supreme Court”).
Office and the parties until all appellate rights have been exhausted, I exercise my discretion to: (1) suspend the requirements in SOP 9 in cases remanded by the Federal Circuit under Arthrex; and (2) hold all such cases in administrative abeyance until the Supreme Court acts on a petition for certiorari or the time for filing such petitions expires.
It is further ORDERED that any other matters remanded by the Federal Circuit under Arthrex will be held in abeyance.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

45 Final Decision: Final Written Decision

Document PGR2018-00029, No. 45 Final Decision - Final Written Decision (P.T.A.B. Aug. 14, 2019)
None of these problems, two-dimensional cards, battle scenes, and boredom, is specific to computers or video games.
As noted by Petitioner, however, although these may indeed be examples of a “high visual effect,” we are persuaded that none is specific to computers or video games.
For reasons analogous to those set forth in the previous paragraph, none of these is specific to computers or video games either.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

43 Hearing Transcript: Hearing Transcript

Document PGR2018-00029, No. 43 Hearing Transcript - Hearing Transcript (P.T.A.B. Aug. 2, 2019)
None of that is disclosed in the specification or at least ex plained and a person of ordinary skill looking at this claim won't know when they are infringing on claim 1 or not so the claim is indefinite, and with that I'll conclude and reserve the ...
The word allowed may not be in the specification as they point out, but it nonetheless is clear from the context of specification that, for example, that if the panel is attempted to be disposed into a space where the panel will not fit, then it is ...
cite Cite Document
Analyze

42 Order: Supplemental Information37 CFR sec 42223

Document PGR2018-00029, No. 42 Order - Supplemental Information37 CFR sec 42223 (P.T.A.B. Jul. 2, 2019)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

41 Order: Order Trial Hearing

Document PGR2018-00029, No. 41 Order - Order Trial Hearing (P.T.A.B. Jun. 7, 2019)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

39 Order: Errata

Document PGR2018-00029, No. 39 Order - Errata (P.T.A.B. May. 21, 2019)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

38 Order: Order Trial Hearing 37 CFR 4270

Document PGR2018-00029, No. 38 Order - Order Trial Hearing 37 CFR 4270 (P.T.A.B. May. 20, 2019)

cite Cite Document
Analyze
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 >>