• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Active Filters1
126 results

Lam Research Corp. v. Inpria Corporation

Docket IPR2024-00033, Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Oct. 16, 2023)
Avelyn Ross, Christopher Kaiser, Debra Dennett, Grace Karaffa Obermann, Grace Obermann, Kristina Kalan, presiding
Log in to see more
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

53 Order Other: ORDER Conduct of the Proceeding Correcting Paper 51 and Clarifying Scope Of Supplemental Briefs due February 19, 2025 37 CFR § 425

Document IPR2024-00033, No. 53 Order Other - ORDER Conduct of the Proceeding Correcting Paper 51 and Clarifying Scope Of Supplemental Briefs due February 19, 2025 37 CFR § 425 (P.T.A.B. Jan. 8...
Log in to see more
cite Cite Document
Analyze

52 Order Other: ORDER Conduct of the Proceeding

Document IPR2024-00033, No. 52 Order Other - ORDER Conduct of the Proceeding (P.T.A.B. Jan. 8, 2025)
Log in to see more
cite Cite Document
Analyze

51 Order Other: Order Denying Motion to Compel Testimony etc

Document IPR2024-00033, No. 51 Order Other - Order Denying Motion to Compel Testimony etc (P.T.A.B. Jan. 6, 2025)
Our sua sponte action is warranted, given the exceedingly advanced stage of this proceeding; namely, all trial-phase briefs have been filed and final oral arguments are set to commence in a matter of weeks.
In addition, any prejudice to Petitioner, resulting from allowing the unauthorized submission of Exhibit 2013 with Patent Owner’s Sur-reply, is mitigated by the routine discovery ordered, and the supplemental briefing authorized, in the next two sections of our analysis.
In the event that ProQuest declines to voluntarily produce Ms. Stewart, the parties, under 37 C.F.R. § 42.52(a), shall cooperate to jointly seek a federal district court subpoena to compel her appearance for the deposition.
The third Garmin factor weighs heavily against granting the additional discovery requested, however, because Petitioner has not addressed, much less demonstrated sufficiently, its inability to generate equivalent information by other means.
We are not persuaded that Petitioner demonstrates adequately, on this record, any reasonable basis for thrusting on these non-parties any burden beyond that necessary to comply with routine discovery as authorized according to the parameters and time table set forth above.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

48 Order Other: ORDER Setting Oral Argument 37 CFR § 4270

Document IPR2024-00033, No. 48 Order Other - ORDER Setting Oral Argument 37 CFR § 4270 (P.T.A.B. Dec. 31, 2024)
Log in to see more
cite Cite Document
Analyze

39 Order on Motion: Order ORDER Conditionally Granting Petitioner’s Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Mr Zachary D Miller 37 CFR § 4210

Document IPR2024-00033, No. 39 Order on Motion - Order ORDER Conditionally Granting Petitioner’s Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Mr Zachary D Miller 37 CFR § 4210 (P.T.A.B. Nov. 22, 2024)
Log in to see more
cite Cite Document
Analyze

35 Order Other: PRELIMINARY GUIDANCE PATENT OWNER’S CONTINGENT MOTION TO AMEND 37 CFR § 42121e

Document IPR2024-00033, No. 35 Order Other - PRELIMINARY GUIDANCE PATENT OWNER’S CONTINGENT MOTION TO AMEND 37 CFR § 42121e (P.T.A.B. Nov. 19, 2024)
Log in to see more
cite Cite Document
Analyze

29 Order Other: Order ORDER Conduct of the Proceeding 37 CFR § 425

Document IPR2024-00033, No. 29 Order Other - Order ORDER Conduct of the Proceeding 37 CFR § 425 (P.T.A.B. Oct. 29, 2024)
Log in to see more
cite Cite Document
Analyze
1 2 3 4 5 ... 7 8 9 >>