• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Active Filters1
160 results

Lumenis Be Ltd. v. BTL Healthcare Technologies A.S.

Docket IPR2021-01284, Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Aug. 5, 2021)
Barbara Parvis, David Cotta, Zhenyu Yang, presiding
Case TypeInter Partes Review
Patent10709895
Patent Owner BTL Healthcare Technologies A.S.
Petitioner Lumenis Be Ltd.
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

10 Notice refund approved: Notice refund approved

Document IPR2021-01284, No. 10 Notice refund approved - Notice refund approved (P.T.A.B. Apr. 5, 2022)
Petitioner’s request for a refund of certain post-institution fees paid on August 5, 2021 in the above proceeding is hereby granted.
The amount of $22,500.00 has been refunded to Petitioner’s deposit account.
The parties are reminded that unless otherwise permitted by 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(b)(2), all filings in this proceeding must be made electronically in the Patent Trial and Appeal Board End to End (PTAB E2E), accessible from the Board Web site at http://www.uspto.gov/PTAB.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

8 Institution Decision Deny: Institution Decision Deny

Document IPR2021-01284, No. 8 Institution Decision Deny - Institution Decision Deny (P.T.A.B. Mar. 21, 2022)
None of the testimony remedies the aforementioned deficiency.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

6 Notice Notice filing date accorded: Notice Notice filing date accorded

Document IPR2021-01284, No. 6 Notice Notice filing date accorded - Notice Notice filing date accorded (P.T.A.B. Sep. 23, 2021)
For more information, please consult the Office Patent Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed. Reg. 48756 (Aug. 14, 2012), which is available on the Board Web site at http://www.uspto.gov/PTAB.
Patent Owner is advised of the requirement to submit mandatory notice information under 37 C.F.R. § 42.8(a)(2) within 21 days of service of the petition.
The parties are advised that under 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c), recognition of counsel pro hac vice requires a showing of good cause.
Many non-profit organizations, both inside and outside the intellectual property field, offer alternative dispute resolution services.
If the parties actually engage in alternative dispute resolution, the PTAB would be interested to learn what mechanism (e.g., arbitration, Case IPR2021-01284 Patent No. 10,709,895 mediation, etc.) was used and the general result.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

2 Petition: Petition for Inter Partes Review

Document IPR2021-01284, No. 2 Petition - Petition for Inter Partes Review (P.T.A.B. Aug. 5, 2021)
Log in to see more
cite Cite Document
Analyze

9 Refund Request: Petitioner Request for Refund of Post Institution Fee

Document IPR2021-01284, No. 9 Refund Request - Petitioner Request for Refund of Post Institution Fee (P.T.A.B. Apr. 1, 2022)
Log in to see more
cite Cite Document
Analyze

7 Preliminary Response: Patent Owners Preliminary Response

Document IPR2021-01284, No. 7 Preliminary Response - Patent Owners Preliminary Response (P.T.A.B. Dec. 23, 2021)
Log in to see more
cite Cite Document
Analyze

4 Notice: Petitioners Updated Mandatory Notice Information

Document IPR2021-01284, No. 4 Notice - Petitioners Updated Mandatory Notice Information (P.T.A.B. Sep. 10, 2021)
Log in to see more
cite Cite Document
Analyze
1 2 3 4 5 ... 10 11 12 >>