• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Active Filters1
33 results

Comcast Cable Communications, LLC v. Rovi Technologies Corporation

Docket IPR2019-00289, Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Nov. 12, 2018)
Karl Easthom, Kevin Cherry, Lynne Pettigrew, presiding
Case TypeInter Partes Review
Patent9578363
Patent Owner Rovi Technologies Corporation
Petitioner Comcast Cable Communications, LLC
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

17 Refund Approval: Notice of Refund

Document IPR2019-00289, No. 17 Refund Approval - Notice of Refund (P.T.A.B. Jul. 18, 2019)
Petitioner’s request for a refund of certain post-institution fees paid on November 12, 2018 in the above proceeding is hereby granted.
The amount of $18,000 has been refunded to Petitioner’s deposit account.
The parties are reminded that unless otherwise permitted by 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(b)(2), all filings in this proceeding must be made electronically in the Patent Trial and Appeal Board End to End (PTAB E2E), accessible from the Board Web site at http://www.uspto.gov/PTAB.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

15 Institution Decision: Trial Instituted Document

Document IPR2019-00289, No. 15 Institution Decision - Trial Instituted Document (P.T.A.B. Jun. 10, 2019)
On November 12, 2018, Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, (“Petitioner”) filed six petitions (see, e.g., IPR2019-00285, Paper 2), each requesting inter partes review of claims 1–20 of U.S. Patent No. 9,587,363 (see, e.g., IPR2019-00285, Ex. 1101, “the ’363 Patent”).
Institution of an inter partes review is authorized by statute when “the information presented in the petition ... and any response ... shows that there is a reasonable likelihood that the petitioner would prevail with respect to at least 1 of the claims challenged in the petition.” 35 U.S.C. § 314(a).
For the reasons given below, upon consideration of the Petitions, the Preliminary Responses, and the supporting evidence, we exercise our discretion under 35 U.S.C. § 314 and deny institution of an inter partes review.
We determine that the integrity of the system is sufficiently served here by our institution of inter partes review of all challenged claims of the ’363 patent in IPR2019-00284.
For the foregoing reasons, based on a balanced assessment of the circumstances of this case, we exercise our discretion under 35 U.S.C. § 314, and deny the instant Petitions requesting institution of inter partes review of the ’363 Patent in IPR2019-00285 to -00289.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

13 Order: Conduct of the Proceeding37 CFR sec 425

Document IPR2019-00289, No. 13 Order - Conduct of the Proceeding37 CFR sec 425 (P.T.A.B. May. 8, 2019)
Log in to see more
cite Cite Document
Analyze

10 Order: ORDER Conduct of the Proceeding

Document IPR2019-00289, No. 10 Order - ORDER Conduct of the Proceeding (P.T.A.B. Apr. 9, 2019)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

6 Order: ERRATUM

Document IPR2019-00289, No. 6 Order - ERRATUM (P.T.A.B. Dec. 21, 2018)
Patent Owner may file a preliminary response to the petition no later than three months from the date of this notice.
For more information, please consult the Office Patent Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed. Reg. 48756 (Aug. 14, 2012), which is available on the Board Web site at http://www.uspto.gov/PTAB.
Patent Owner is advised of the requirement to submit mandatory notice information under 37 C.F.R. § 42.8(a)(2) within 21 days of service of the petition.
The parties are advised that under 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c), recognition of counsel pro hac vice requires a showing of good cause.
Such motions shall be filed in accordance with the “Order -- Authorizing Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission” in Case IPR2013-00639, Paper 7, a copy of which is available on the Board Web site under “Representative Orders, Decisions, and Notices.” The parties are reminded that unless otherwise permitted by 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(b)(2), all filings in this proceeding must be made electronically in the Case IPR2019-00289 Patent 9,578,363 B2 Patent Review Processing System (PRPS), accessible from the Board Web site at http://www.uspto.gov/PTAB.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

5 Notice of Filing Date Accorded to Petition: Notice of Accord Filing Date

Document IPR2019-00289, No. 5 Notice of Filing Date Accorded to Petition - Notice of Accord Filing Date (P.T.A.B. Dec. 13, 2018)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

2 Petition: Petition

Document IPR2019-00289, No. 2 Petition - Petition (P.T.A.B. Nov. 12, 2018)

cite Cite Document
Analyze
1 2 3 >>