• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Active Filters1
5 results

Stover et al vs SS Sheridan, LLC

Docket DF-121940, Oklahoma State, Court of Appeals (Feb. 5, 2024)
Appellee SS SHERIDAN LLC
Appellant STOVER, JAMES W
Appellant Stover, Janet R
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

No. 1057691751

Document Stover et al vs SS Sheridan, LLC, DF-121940, No. 1057691751 (Oklahoma State, Court of Appeals Apr. 26, 2024)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOM4¢yen
STOVER, Husband and Wife,
Respectfully submitted,
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 1057691583

Document Stover et al vs SS Sheridan, LLC, DF-121940, No. 1057691583 (Oklahoma State, Court of Appeals Apr. 12, 2024)
Consideration of the issue of whether briefing is to be ordered in this summary disposition appeal, including consideration of the application for leave to file an amicus curiae brief and any objections thereto, is deferred to the decisional stage of this appeal.
121940 James Stover et al. v. SS Sheridan LLC Appellee/counter-appellant’s motion to associate JoAnn T. Sandifer as counselto practice in the above styled and numbered cause is granted.
R. 1.5(a) and Article 2 § 5 of the Rules Creating and Controlling the Oklahoma Bar Association, 5 O.S.
121572 Patricia Rudder v. Catherine Reynods Appellant's motion for an extension oftimeto file the brief in chief is granted for 20 days from the current date.
Appellants will continue to be represented in this matter by attorneys D. Todd Riddles and Tyler J. Coble who havepreviously entered
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 1057691494

Document Stover et al vs SS Sheridan, LLC, DF-121940, No. 1057691494 (Oklahoma State, Court of Appeals Apr. 5, 2024)
If none of the above applies, whatis the specific statutory basis for determining the judgmentor order is appealable? 6.
RELATED OR PRIOR APPEALS List all prior appeals involving sameparties or same trial court proceeding: None IV.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 1057691182

Document Stover et al vs SS Sheridan, LLC, DF-121940, No. 1057691182 (Oklahoma State, Court of Appeals Mar. 7, 2024)
This transcript was previously ordered and was submitted as part of the Appendix To Plaintiffs’ Response and Objection To Defendant’s Motion for Judgment Notwithstanding The Verdict.
All Exhibits submitted with Defendant's Motion for Judgment Notwithstanding Verdict and Plaintiffs’ Response thereto.
Items are designated bycircling the items on a copy ofthe appearance docket attached hereto as Exhibit A. (To use this method ofdesignation a copy ofthe appearance docket must be attached to the designation of record with the items circled, and all copies of the designation of record filed of record and served on other parties must have a copy of the attached appearance docket showing the items circled.)
Part D of this form must be completed by court reporter pursuant to 12 -‘S.Supp.1995 §990A(G) if the designation is filed by an appellant and a transcript is ordered.
Appellee need not complete part D ofthis form.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Can’t find a case you think should be here?

Use our supplemental search tool to find dockets that you may not see here. Information on Fees

Start a Supplemental Search