• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Active Filters1
32 results

WALKERT JIMENEZ CEBALLOS v. FRANK MASSARO et al

Docket 806045/2024E, New York State, Bronx County, Supreme Court (Apr. 12, 2024)
Case TypeTorts - Motor Vehicle
TagsTort, Civil, Vehicle
Plaintiff Walkert Jimenez Ceballos
Defendant Frank Massaro
Defendant Debra A. Massaro
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

ORDER - PRELIMINARY CONFERENCE DATED 10/16/2024.

Document WALKERT JIMENEZ CEBALLOS v. FRANK MASSARO et al, 806045/2024E, 16 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., Bronx County Oct. 17, 2024)
... 1.~~None & All parties to exchange names and addressesofall witnesses, opposing parties” statements, and photographs. If none, an affirmation to that effect shall be exchanged. bx Authorizations for plaintiff's emnpcyneat records ...
cite Cite Document
Analyze

AFFIDAVIT OR AFFIRMATION IN REPLY (Motion #1)

Document WALKERT JIMENEZ CEBALLOS v. FRANK MASSARO et al, 806045/2024E, 31 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., Bronx County Feb. 28, 2025)
Log in to see more
cite Cite Document
Analyze

EXHIBIT(S) - B (Motion #1) Photographs of Defendants' Deployed Airbags

Document WALKERT JIMENEZ CEBALLOS v. FRANK MASSARO et al, 806045/2024E, 30 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., Bronx County Feb. 26, 2025)
INDEX NO. 806045/2024EINDEX NO. 806045/2024E INDEX NO. 806045/2024E RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/24/2024RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/26/2025 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/26/2028 FILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 09/24/2024 09:36 AMFILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 02/26/2025 05:10 PM FILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 09/26/2028 03:36 BM NYSCEF DOC. NO.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

AFFIDAVIT OR AFFIRMATION IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION (Motion #1)

Document WALKERT JIMENEZ CEBALLOS v. FRANK MASSARO et al, 806045/2024E, 28 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., Bronx County Feb. 26, 2025)
------------------------------------------------------------------x BORIS RAYTSIN, an attorney duly admitted to practice before the Courts of the State of New York, does hereby affirm, under penalty of perjury, as follows:
defendant driver, and as such, has not obtained testimony that, upon information and belief may serve to create triable issues of fact.
Mere conclusory statements, such as the factually unsupported use of the words “sudden” and “unexpected,” are insufficient to defeat a summary judgment motion, See Gilbert Frank Corp. v. Federal Ins. Co., 70 N.Y.2d 966, 520 N.E.2d 512 (1988).
59, Lines 14-23, attached as Exhibit “A.” Defendant's Affidavit states that he was traveling at 20 MPH, and that the impact caused his vehicle to spin counterclockwise.
------------------------------------------------------------------x BORIS RAYTSIN, an attorney duly licensed to practice before the courts of the state of New York, does hereby affirm, under penalty of perjury, as follows:
cite Cite Document
Analyze

EXHIBIT(S) - A (Motion #1) Plaintiff's EBT Transcript

Document WALKERT JIMENEZ CEBALLOS v. FRANK MASSARO et al, 806045/2024E, 29 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., Bronx County Feb. 26, 2025)
Log in to see more
cite Cite Document
Analyze

26

Document WALKERT JIMENEZ CEBALLOS v. FRANK MASSARO et al, 806045/2024E, 26 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., Bronx County Jan. 14, 2025)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

23

Document WALKERT JIMENEZ CEBALLOS v. FRANK MASSARO et al, 806045/2024E, 23 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., Bronx County Dec. 19, 2024)

cite Cite Document
Analyze
1 2 3 >>