• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Active Filters1
32 results

WALKERT JIMENEZ CEBALLOS v. FRANK MASSARO et al

Docket 806045/2024E, New York State, Bronx County, Supreme Court (Apr. 12, 2024)
Case TypeTorts - Motor Vehicle
TagsTort, Civil, Vehicle
Plaintiff Walkert Jimenez Ceballos
Defendant Frank Massaro
Defendant Debra A. Massaro
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

ORDER - PRELIMINARY CONFERENCE DATED 10/16/2024.

Document WALKERT JIMENEZ CEBALLOS v. FRANK MASSARO et al, 806045/2024E, 16 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., Bronx County Oct. 17, 2024)
... 1.~~None & All parties to exchange names and addressesofall witnesses, opposing parties” statements, and photographs. If none, an affirmation to that effect shall be exchanged. bx Authorizations for plaintiff's emnpcyneat records ...
cite Cite Document
Analyze

AFFIDAVIT OR AFFIRMATION IN REPLY (Motion #1)

Document WALKERT JIMENEZ CEBALLOS v. FRANK MASSARO et al, 806045/2024E, 31 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., Bronx County Feb. 28, 2025)
This Affirmation is respectfully submitted in Reply to plaintiff Walkert Jimenez Ceballos’ opposition and in further support of defendants Frank Massaro’s and Debra Massaro’s Motion for Summary Judgment on the issue of liability.
Further, paragraph #15 state that the defendant was traveling at approximately twenty miles per hour at the time of the subject motor vehicle accident.
Further, it is well settled that the affirmation of plaintiff’s attorney, who has no personal knowledge about how the accident occurred, is without “evidentiary value and thus unavailing" to create a triable issue of fact which would warrant denial of the motion (Id.).
However, the Police Accident Report, attached to your affirmant’s motion as Exhibit “D,” is certified and therefore admissible, while the plaintiff’s deposition transcript is inadmissible for the reasons discussed previously.
As such, plaintiff failed to enter the left travel lane before it was safe and violated Vehicle and Traffic Law Section 1162, as discussed in your affirmant’s underlying motion.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

30

Document WALKERT JIMENEZ CEBALLOS v. FRANK MASSARO et al, 806045/2024E, 30 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., Bronx County Feb. 26, 2025)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

28

Document WALKERT JIMENEZ CEBALLOS v. FRANK MASSARO et al, 806045/2024E, 28 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., Bronx County Feb. 26, 2025)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

29

Document WALKERT JIMENEZ CEBALLOS v. FRANK MASSARO et al, 806045/2024E, 29 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., Bronx County Feb. 26, 2025)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

26

Document WALKERT JIMENEZ CEBALLOS v. FRANK MASSARO et al, 806045/2024E, 26 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., Bronx County Jan. 14, 2025)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

23

Document WALKERT JIMENEZ CEBALLOS v. FRANK MASSARO et al, 806045/2024E, 23 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., Bronx County Dec. 19, 2024)

cite Cite Document
Analyze
1 2 3 >>