• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
6 results

JUN HYEOK KIM et al v. KAI LIN

Docket 705060/2017, New York State, Queens County, Supreme Court (Apr. 13, 2017)
Log in to see more
cite Cite Docket

ANSWER WITH COUNTER-CLAIM(S)

Document JUN HYEOK KIM et al v. KAI LIN, 705060/2017, 3 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., Queens County Nov. 27, 2017)
Log in to see more
cite Cite Document

SUMMONS + COMPLAINT

Document JUN HYEOK KIM et al v. KAI LIN, 705060/2017, 1 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., Queens County Apr. 13, 2017)
Log in to see more
cite Cite Document

STIPULATION - DISCONTINUANCE (PRE RJI)

Document JUN HYEOK KIM et al v. KAI LIN, 705060/2017, 5 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., Queens County Dec. 18, 2017)
Log in to see more
cite Cite Document

STATEMENT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR ELECTRONIC FILING

Document JUN HYEOK KIM et al v. KAI LIN, 705060/2017, 4 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., Queens County Nov. 27, 2017)
Log in to see more
cite Cite Document

AFFIRMATION/AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE

Document JUN HYEOK KIM et al v. KAI LIN, 705060/2017, 2 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., Queens County Sep. 5, 2017)
— against — Plaintiff(s) The papers served bore the index # and date of filing.
deponent served the within SUMMONS AND VERIFIED COMPLAINT WITH NOTICE REGARDING AVAILABILITY OF ELECTRONIC FILING SUPREME COURT CASES on KAI LIN therein named, by delivering thereat a true copy of each to "JOHN SMITH" a person of suitable age and discretion.
and deposited said wrapper in a post office or official depository under exclusive care and custody of the United States Postal Service within New York State on May 12, 2017 by REGULAR FIRST CLASS MAIL in an envelope marked PERSONAL & CONFIDENTIAL and not indicating on the outside thereof, by return address or otherwise, that the communication is from an attorney or concerns an action against the person to be served.
Person spoken to was asked whether the Defendant was in the military service of the State of New York or the United States and received a negative reply.
Upon information and belief based upon the conversation and observation as aforesaid deponent avers that the Defendant is not in the military service of the State of New York or the United States as that term is defined in the statutes of the State of New York or the Federal Soldiers and Sailors Civil Relief Act.
cite Cite Document