• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Active Filters1
3 results

Harrison v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. et al

Docket 7:24-cv-02637, New York Southern District Court (Apr. 8, 2024)
Judge Kenneth M. Karas, presiding, Magistrate Judge Andrew E. Krause
Personal Injury - Other
DivisionWhite Plains
FlagsECF
Cause28:1332nr Diversity: Notice of Removal
Case Type360 Personal Injury - Other
Tags360 Personal Injury, Personal Injury, Tort, Civil, Other, 360 Personal Injury, Personal Injury, Tort, Civil, Other
Defendant CVS Albany LLC
Cross Claimant CVS Albany LLC
Defendant CVS Albany LLC
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

No. 19 CONFIDENTIALITY STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER...regarding procedures to be followed that ...

Document Harrison v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. et al, 7:24-cv-02637, No. 19 (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 17, 2024)
——ee WHEREAS, the parties having agreed to the following terms of confidentiality, and the Court having found that good cause exists for the issuance of an appropriately tailored confidentiality order pursuant to Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is hereby ORDEREDthatthe following restrictions and procedures shall apply to the information and documents exchanged bythe parties in connection with the pre-trial phase ofthis action: Counsel for any party may designate any documentor information, in whole orin
Any Personally Identifying Information (“PII”) (e.g., social security numbers, ve financial account numbers, passwords, and information that may be used for identity theft) exchangedin discovery shall be maintained by the receiving party in a mannerthatis secure.
This Order shall be interpreted to provide the maximum protection allowed by Federal Rule of Evidence 502(d).
shall be promptly (and in no eventlater than 30 daysafter entry offinal judgment no longer subject to further appeal) returned to the producing party or certified as destroyed, except that the parties’ counselshall be permitted to retain their workingfiles on the condition that thosefiles will remain protected.
Dated: —Junel7__, 2024 White Plains, New York - - Counselfor Plaintiff(s) Yaaa Cattnn icp .
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 17 ORDER: In order to facilitate the progress of pre-trial discovery in this litigation in a ...

Document Harrison v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. et al, 7:24-cv-02637, No. 17 (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 14, 2024)
In calculating when a dispute arises, the Court anticipates that the parties will have complied with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Civil Rules of the United States District Courts for the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York, in that the discovery demand or disclosure at issue, and, where applicable, the adversary’s response, have been served.
If the dispute is not resolved within 3 business days of the completion of the meet-and-confer process, the objecting party then has 3 business days to bring the issue to the attention of the Court by filing a letter motion requesting a conference, in accordance with Local Civil Rule 37.2.
Any adverse party has 3 business days thereafter to submit a response, which also must not exceed 3 single-spaced pages.
In most cases, the parties will have an opportunity to make oral replies to points made in the letters at an in-person conference regarding the dispute.
When a legal privilege is asserted as a basis for refusing to comply with a discovery demand, the parties must follow the same timetable set forth above for attempting to resolve the dispute and raising the issue with the Court.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Can’t find a case you think should be here?

Use our supplemental search tool to find dockets that you may not see here. Information on Fees

Start a Supplemental Search