• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Active Filters1
22 results

JULIO CESAR ILLICACHI UDEO v. FIFTH AVENUE BUILDERS LLC et al

Docket 513224/2024, New York State, Kings County, Supreme Court (May 10, 2024)
Case TypeTorts - Other (Labor Law)
TagsTort, Civil, Other, Labor Law
Plaintiff Julio cesar Illicachi udeo
Defendant FIFTH AVENUE BUILDERS LLC
Defendant 1601 DEKALB OWNER LLC
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

DECISION + ORDER ON MOTION (Motion #1)

Document JULIO CESAR ILLICACHI UDEO v. FIFTH AVENUE BUILDERS LLC et al, 513224/2024, 17 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., Kings County Aug. 12, 2024)
Trial Term, Part -TS of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, held in and for the County of Kings, at the Courthouse, located at Civic Center, Borougp itf Brooklyx1Cjity 2knd State 5,3 + 202,7 of New York, on the "V A day of
vLern Hon.
No. 32 Index No. -31 32-24 )29 - against- Ave, (3_,;/(Lci Lt( The following papers numbered 1 to Notice of Motion - Order to Show Cause and Affidavits (Affirmations) Annexed Answering Affidavit (Affirmation) Reply Affidavit (Affirmation) Affidavit (Affirmation) Pleadings- Exhibits Stipulations - Minutes Filed Papers
of\
cite Cite Document
Analyze

AFFIDAVIT OR AFFIRMATION IN OPPOSITION TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Defendants' Affirmation in Partial Opposition to OSC (Relieved as Counsel)

Document JULIO CESAR ILLICACHI UDEO v. FIFTH AVENUE BUILDERS LLC et al, 513224/2024, 16 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., Kings County Aug. 7, 2024)
Mark D. Rodriguez, Esq., an attorney duly admitted to practice law before the Courts of the State of New York, hereby affirms the following to be true under the penalties of perjury:
As such, I am fully familiar with the facts and circumstances of this matter as set forth herein based on my handling and review of this file.
From the outset, your Affirmant does not oppose Gorayeb & Associates, P.C.’s application to withdraw as counsel to plaintiff, however, it is respectfully requested that if the Court grants Gorayeb & Associates, P.C.’s application to be relieved, that a reasonable parameter be set for plaintiff to find new counsel, proceed pro se, or face automatic dismissal of this matter.
Allowing plaintiff a sixty (60) day time period to resume prosecution of this matter will result in undue prejudice to the Defendants and delays in discovery, which necessarily frustrate the judicial process.
For the foregoing reasons, your Affirmant respectfully requests that this Court limit plaintiff’s time frame to seek new counsel or proceed pro se to thirty (30) days to avoid further undue prejudice to the Defendant.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

15

Document JULIO CESAR ILLICACHI UDEO v. FIFTH AVENUE BUILDERS LLC et al, 513224/2024, 15 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., Kings County Jul. 26, 2024)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

12

Document JULIO CESAR ILLICACHI UDEO v. FIFTH AVENUE BUILDERS LLC et al, 513224/2024, 12 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., Kings County Jul. 10, 2024)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

9

Document JULIO CESAR ILLICACHI UDEO v. FIFTH AVENUE BUILDERS LLC et al, 513224/2024, 9 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., Kings County Jul. 10, 2024)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

20

Document JULIO CESAR ILLICACHI UDEO v. FIFTH AVENUE BUILDERS LLC et al, 513224/2024, 20 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., Kings County Nov. 28, 2024)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

21

Document JULIO CESAR ILLICACHI UDEO v. FIFTH AVENUE BUILDERS LLC et al, 513224/2024, 21 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., Kings County Nov. 28, 2024)

cite Cite Document
Analyze
1 2 >>