• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Active Filters1
23 results

KING v. O'MALLEY

Docket 4:24-cv-00027, Indiana Southern District Court (Feb. 13, 2024)
Magistrate Judge Kellie M. Barr, presiding, Judge Tanya Walton Pratt
Social Security - SSID Tit. XVI
DivisionNew Albany
FlagsCASREF
Cause42:205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Case Type864 Social Security - SSID Tit. XVI
Tags864 Social Security, Ssid Tit. XVI, 864 Social Security, Ssid Tit. XVI
Plaintiff KAIYA J. KING
Defendant MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Plaintiff King
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

LAWRENCE et al v. LETICA CORPORATION

Docket 3:24-cv-00027, Indiana Southern District Court (Feb. 5, 2024)
District Judge Matthew P. Brookman, presiding, Magistrate Judge Crystal S. Wildeman
Labor - Fair Labor Standards Act
Log in to see more
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

SAINTIGNON v. YARBER et al

Docket 2:24-cv-00027, Indiana Southern District Court (Jan. 25, 2024)
Judge James Patrick Hanlon, presiding, Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore
Prison Condition
DivisionTerre Haute
Cause42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Case Type560 Prison Condition
Tags560 Prison Condition, 560 Prison Condition
Plaintiff DANNY L. SAINTIGNON, JR.
Defendant YARBER
Defendant IVY
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

FORTE et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Docket 1:24-cv-00027, Indiana Southern District Court (Jan. 5, 2024)
Judge James Patrick Hanlon, presiding, Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore
Motor Vehicle
DivisionIndianapolis
FlagsCLOSED
Cause28:1346 Tort Claim
Case Type350 Motor Vehicle
Tags350 Vehicle, 350 Vehicle
Plaintiff Forte
Defendant United States of America
Plaintiff STACEY FORTE
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

No. 57 MINUTE ORDER for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Crystal S. Wildeman: Status Conference ...

Document LAWRENCE et al v. LETICA CORPORATION, 3:24-cv-00027, No. 57 (S.D.Ind. Dec. 5, 2024)
This matter came before the Honorable Crystal S. Wildeman, United States Magistrate Judge, by telephone, at 9:00 a.m., Evansville time (CST), on December 5, 2024, for a conference under Rule 16, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
The Parties' joint oral motion for and extension of time of up to and including December 20, 2024, to submit their Second Amended Case Management Plan is GRANTED.
A Telephonic Status Conference is set for February 10, 2025, at 9:00 a.m., Evansville time (CST), before the Honorable Crystal S. Wildeman, Case 3:24-cv-00027-MPB-CSW Document 57 Filed 12/05/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: United States Magistrate Judge.
The information needed by counsel to participate in this telephonic conference will be provided by a separate notification.
Any party shall file any corrections or additions within fourteen (14) days after receipt of this order.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 45 ORDER granting 44 STIPULATION TO CONDITIONALLY CERTIFY THIS CASE AS A COLLECTIVE ACTION, PURSUANT ...

Document LAWRENCE et al v. LETICA CORPORATION, 3:24-cv-00027, No. 45 (S.D.Ind. Sep. 3, 2024)
Members of the Putative FLSA Collective shall have forty-five (45) calendar days from the date the Notice is sent to them to join this lawsuit by timely submitting a signed written Consent Form to the Administrator via U.S. mail, fax, or email.
The Consent Form must be postmarked and/or received by the Administrator no later than the 45th day after the Notice is sent out to distributed to Putative FLSA Collective Members be valid and timely.
The stipulation of the Parties also provides that Defendants reserve all rights to contest and oppose any subsequent request by Plaintiffs and the members of the FLSA collective for the certification of a class action under Fed. R. Civ.
P. 23, and the fact that Defendants have consented to the conditional certification of an FLSA collective for notice purposes only shall not be relied upon or cited by Plaintiffs in any way in connection with any future motion seeking certification of a Rule 23 class action nor any response opposing decertification of the conditionally certified Putative FLSA Collective in this or any other action against Defendants.
A status conference will be set approximately twenty-one (21) calendar after the conclusion of the opt-in period, so the Parties can propose an updated Case Management Order and schedule for the next phase of litigation.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 8 ORDER SCREENING COMPLAINT AND DIRECTING FURTHER PROCEEDINGS - Because Plaintiff is a "prisoner," ...

Document SAINTIGNON v. YARBER et al, 2:24-cv-00027, No. 8 (S.D.Ind. Apr. 29, 2024)
To determine whether the complaint states a claim, the Court applies the same standard as when addressing a motion to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6).
"A claim has facial plausibility when the plaintiff pleads factual content that allows the court to draw the reasonable inference that the defendant is liable for the misconduct alleged."
The Court construes pro se complaints liberally and holds them to a "less stringent standard than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers."
Plaintiff alleges that on July 14, 2023, he was in a segregation unit at WVCF with 11 other inmates when officers, including Lt. Yarber and Sgt.
Applying the screening standard to the factual allegations in the complaint, Plaintiff has adequately stated Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference claims against Lt. Yarber and Sgt.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 44 Joint MOTION for an Order Approving Stipulation of Conditional Certification, filed by Defendants ...

Document LAWRENCE et al v. LETICA CORPORATION, 3:24-cv-00027, No. 44 (S.D.Ind. Aug. 30, 2024)
While Defendants do not believe that collective treatment is appropriate in this action, they nonetheless agreed to discuss this proposal with Plaintiffs. 5.
cite Cite Document
Analyze
1 2 >>