• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
3 results

Eli Lilly and Company v. Teva Pharmaceuticals

Docket 20-1876, U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit (June 11, 2020)
Appellant ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Appellee TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL GMBH
cite Cite Docket

OPINION filed for the court by Lourie, Circuit Judge; Bryson, Circuit Judge and O'Malley, Circuit ...

Document ELI LILLY AND COMPANY v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS, 20-1876 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 16, 2021)
Axiomatically, without an individual experi- encing vasomotor symptoms, there would be no effective amount that could be used to treat the nonexistent symp- toms.
cite Cite Document

No. 25 MODIFIED ENTRY: OPENING BRIEF FILED by Appellant Eli Lilly and Company

Document Eli Lilly and Company v. Teva Pharmaceuticals, 20-1876, No. 25 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 2, 2020)
None/Not Applicable 2.
None/Not Applicable 3.
None/Not Applicable Eli Lilly and Company Eli Lilly and Company 4.
None/Not Applicable Additional pages attached John Williamson Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP 5.
Additional pages attached None/Not Applicable C.A. No. 1:18-cv-12029 Teva Pharm. Int’l GmbH v. Eli Lilly & Co. (D. Mass.
None/Not Applicable Additional pages attached v Case: 20-1876 Document: 25 Page: 7 Filed: 11/02/2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page STATEMENT OF RELATED CASES ................................................................. xiii STATEMENT ...
In its Reply, Petitioner argued that “[t]he Board invited testimony on whether such symptoms include stimulated cAMP formulation, but Teva provided none.
(5) None of the additional art Petitioner cites provides a reasonable expectation that an anti-CGRP antibody can be safely used for treating migraine in humans Patent Owner argues that “Lilly relies on Queen for a reasonable expectation of ...
cite Cite Document
+ More Snippets