• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Active Filters1
2 results

(PS) Baldwin v. Fifth Third Bank, N.A. et al

Docket 2:24-cv-03401, California Eastern District Court (Dec. 6, 2024)
District Judge Dena M. Coggins, presiding, Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson
Foreclosure
DivisionSacramento
FlagsPRO_SE, CIVIL
Cause28:1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
Case Type220 Foreclosure
Tags220 Foreclosure, 220 Foreclosure
Plaintiff (PS) Baldwin
Defendant Fifth Third Bank, n.A.
Plaintiff Bryon Baldwin
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

No. 12 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 1/23/2025 ORDERING Plaintiff ...

Document (PS) Baldwin v. Fifth Third Bank, N.A. et al, 2:24-cv-03401, No. 12 (E.D.Cal. Jan. 24, 2025)
To manage its docket effectively, the court requires litigants to meet certain deadlines.
The court may impose sanctions, including dismissing a case, for failure to comply with its orders or local rules.
Involuntary dismissal is a harsh penalty, but a district court has a duty to administer justice expeditiously and avoid needless burden for the parties.
The court will give plaintiff the opportunity to explain why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to defendants’ motions.
Plaintiff shall show cause, by no later than February 20, 2025, why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to timely file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to defendants’ motion.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Can’t find a case you think should be here?

Use our supplemental search tool to find dockets that you may not see here. Information on Fees

Start a Supplemental Search