• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Active Filters1
3 results

Blue Spike, LLC v. Media Science Incorporated

Docket 2:17-cv-05656, California Central District Court (July 31, 2017)
Judge George H. Wu, presiding, Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick
Patent
DivisionLos Angeles (Western Division)
Flags(Ex), CLOSED, DISCOVERY, MANADR, PPP
Cause35:271 Patent Infringement
Case Type830 Patent
Tags830 Patent, 830 Patent
Plaintiff Blue Spike, LLC
Consol Plaintiff Blue Spike, LLC
Defendant Media Science Incorporated
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

No. 178 ORDER TO DISMISS MEDIA SCIENCE INCORPORATED by Judge George H. Wu: ORDERED that the claims ...

Document Blue Spike, LLC v. Media Science Incorporated, 2:17-cv-05656, No. 178 (C.D.Cal. Aug. 16, 2017)
Motion to Dismiss (Demurrer)
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ.
P. 41(a), recognizing the Stipulation of Dismissal filed by plaintiff Blue Spike, LLC and defendant Media Science Incorporated pursuant to a settlement of the above- captioned litigation between the parties, it is ordered as follows:
ORDERED that the claims asserted herein by Plaintiff Blue Spike, LLC against Defendant Media Science Incorporated be, and hereby are, dismissed with prejudice; and ORDERED that the parties shall bear their own attorneys’ fees, expenses and costs.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 1 COMPLAINT against Verimatrix, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0540-5686114

Document Blue Spike, LLC v. Media Science Incorporated, 2:17-cv-05656, No. 1 (C.D.Cal. Apr. 1, 2016)
Complaint
Verimatrix, Inc. is a California corporation and has its principal place of business at 6059 Cornerstone Court West, San Diego, CA 92121.
On information and belief Verimatrix monitors video content related to patrons residing in the Eastern District of Texas.
Thus, the Court’s exercise of jurisdiction over Defendant will not offend traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice.
Defendant designs, develops, employs, and/or manufactures a digital watermarking technology (including, but not limited to, VideoMark and StreamMark and their related solutions ViewRight, Video Content Authority Systems (VCAS), and Verimatrix/Reveal) that encodes and/or decodes watermarks contained within video content, the “Accused Products,” which infringe one or more claims of the Patents-in- Suit.
enter a judgment requiring Defendant to pay the costs of this action, including all disbursements, and attorneys’ fees as provided by 35 U.S.C. §285, together with prejudgment interest; and
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Can’t find a case you think should be here?

Use our supplemental search tool to find dockets that you may not see here. Information on Fees

Start a Supplemental Search