The Court of Appeals for the Ninth District in Houston, Texas rendered its opinion and judgment in D o y l e J .

Petitioner relies on the following facts as a reasonable explanation for the requested extension of time: Counsel for the petitioner, as a result of a failure to provide a safe working environment on the part of his commercial landlord, resulting from an incident of violence directed toward two female staff member, compounded by additional factors, was required to relocate the law firm, which represents petitioner, on extremely short notice and within which lay the original deadline for filing the petition for review; all of which precluded the preparation of a comprehensive, thoughtful, well reason and well supported petition.

Therefore, Petitioner prays that this Court grant this motion for extension of time.

R. App. P. 10.1(a)(5), I certify that I have attempted conference with James B. Edwards, Edwards & Associates and Scott B. Novak, Lorance & Thompson, who are presumed opposed.

STYLE: BLEVINS v. BISHAI Today the Supreme Court of Texas received and filed a motion for extension of time to file petition for review pursuant to Rule 53.7(f) in the above numbered and styled case.

STYLE: BLEVINS v. BISHAI Today the Supreme Court of Texas received and filed a motion for extension of time to file petition for review pursuant to Rule 53.7(f) in the above numbered and styled case.

STYLE: BLEVINS v. BISHAI Today the Supreme Court of Texas received and filed a motion for extension of time to file petition for review pursuant to Rule 53.7(f) in the above numbered and styled case.

STYLE: BLEVINS v. BISHAI Today the Supreme Court of Texas received and filed a motion for extension of time to file petition for review pursuant to Rule 53.7(f) in the above numbered and styled case.

The Court of Appeals for the Ninth District in Houston, Texas rendered its opinion and judgment in D o y l e J .

Counsel for the Petitioner, as a result of a failure to provide a safe working environment on the part of his commercial landlord, resulting from an incident of violence directed toward two female staff member, compounded by additional factors, was required to relocate the law firm, which represents Petitioner, on extremely short notice and within which lay the original deadline for filing the Petition for Review.

which, in turn, formed the basis for Petitioner’s First Motion for Extension of Time to File Petition for Review, the firm which represents Petitioner was beset with a series of logistical problems, most notably which has been the inability of the new location to provide proper support in connecting the firm to its client data and email hub server, hamstringing the firm in effectively reconnecting with its’ clients and attendant obligations.

Due to this impaired accessibility to case materials, counsel for Petitioner herein requests an extension of time of 14 days, to September 9, 2017, to file its Petition for Review.

STYLE: BLEVINS v. BISHAI Today the Supreme Court of Texas received and filed a second motion for extension of time to file petition for review pursuant to Rule 53.7(f) in the above numbered and styled case.

STYLE: BLEVINS v. BISHAI Today the Supreme Court of Texas received and filed a second motion for extension of time to file petition for review pursuant to Rule 53.7(f) in the above numbered and styled case.

STYLE: BLEVINS v. BISHAI Today the Supreme Court of Texas received and filed a second motion for extension of time to file petition for review pursuant to Rule 53.7(f) in the above numbered and styled case.

STYLE: BLEVINS v. BISHAI Today the Supreme Court of Texas received and filed a second motion for extension of time to file petition for review pursuant to Rule 53.7(f) in the above numbered and styled case.