Search court records - party Ryan Artis, page 5

No. 6 - Extension of Time Granted

Document Promo International, Inc. v. Procell Therapeutics, Inc., 92085673, No. 6 (T.T.A.B. Aug. 20, 2024)

Generally, the Federal Rules of Evidence apply to Board trials.

The parties may stipulate to a wide variety of matters, and many requirements relevant to the trial phase of Board proceedings are set forth in Trademark Rules 2.121 through 2.125.

Oral argument at final hearing will be scheduled only upon the timely submission of a separate notice as allowed by Trademark Rule 2.129(a).

Note: Parties are strongly encouraged to check the entire document before filing.1 The Board will not extend or reset proceeding schedule dates or other deadlines to allow time to re-file documents.

1 To facilitate accuracy, ESTTA provides thumbnails to view each page before submitting.

Cite Document

Analyze

Search within this case
Analyze Party
Analyze Firm
- Riverside Law
- Sanchelima

Rain International LLC v. Bkon LLC

Docket 91235681, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (July 19, 2017)

Case Type	Opposition
Marks	RAIN
Applicant	Bkon LLC
Opposer	Rain International LLC

Cite Docket

Analyze

No. 2 - Notice and Trial Dates Sent; Answer Due:

Document Promo International, Inc. v. Procell Therapeutics, Inc., 92085673, No. 2 (T.T.A.B. Jul. 12, 2024)

Scheduling Order

An answer filed on paper under these limited circumstances must be accompanied by a Petition to the Director (and the required fee under Trademark Rule 2.6).

During their conference, the parties are to discuss whether they wish to seek mediation or arbitration, and whether they can stipulate to the Board's Accelerated Case Resolution (ACR) process for a more efficient and cost-effective means of obtaining the Board’s determination of the proceeding.

Regarding the scope and limits of discovery, see TBMP 414; discoverable items may include documents, tangible things, and electronically stored information

Regarding the procedures and deadlines for pretrial disclosures and trial, and specifically the noticing, taking, serving and submitting of evidence and testimony, see Trademark Rules 2.120(k), 2.121, 2.122, 2.123 and 2.125, as well as TBMP Chapter 700.

Note: Parties are strongly encouraged to check the entire document before filing.1 The Board will not extend or reset proceeding schedule dates or other deadlines to allow

Cite Document

Analyze

Search within this case
Analyze Party
Analyze Firm
- Riverside Law
- Sanchelima

No. 2 - Ext Granted

Document Life Line Screening of America, Ltd. v. Red Nucleus Solutions Limited Liability Company, 98108824, No. 2 (T.T.A.B. Jul. 3, 2024)

The request to extend time to oppose is granted until 10/02/2024 on behalf of potential opposer Life Line Screening of America, Ltd..

Cite Document

Analyze

Search within this case
Analyze Party
Analyze Firm
- Iverson IP
- Riverside Law

ALPHA Calcit Fullstoff Gesellschaft mbH v. Whitford Corporation

Docket 91234559, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (May 15, 2017)

Case Type	Opposition
Marks	ALPHA, ALPHALEN, ALPHACARB
Applicant	Whitford Corporation
Opposer	ALPHA Calcit Fullstoff Gesellschaft mbH

Cite Docket

Analyze

Search within this case
Analyze Party
Analyze Firm
- Purdue Law Offices
- Riverside Law

LAGOINHA ORLANDO

Docket 98533023, Trademark (May 3, 2024)

Case Type	Service mark
Class	Religious and spiritual services, namely, conducting religious worship, marriage ceremonies, baptismal ceremonies, baby dedications, bereavement ceremonies, and religious counseling; Religious and spiritual services, namely, providing gatherings and retreats to develop and enhance the spiritual lives of individuals; 100; 101
Marks	LAGOINHA ORLANDO
Original Applicant	Lagoinha Orlando Church