• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Active Filters1
Displaying 39-53 of 25,434 results

ABBEY LANE VS BLACK

Docket SWS1802105, California State, Riverside County, Superior Court (Oct. 18, 2018)
DivisionSouthwest
Case TypeSmall Claims-$1500 & Under
TagsSmall Claim, Civil
Plaintiff ABBEY LANE HOMEOWNERS' ASSOCIATION
Defendant RICHARD BLACK
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

In re Precept Brands LLC

Docket 87198766, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (Feb. 28, 2018)
Log in to see more
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

No. 296 ORDER FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE granting 291 Motion for Paul DeCamp to Appear Pro Hac Vice

Document Piney et al v. City Of New York et al, 1:25-cv-00671, No. 296 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 27, 2025)
Motion to Appear Pro Hac ViceGranted
Log in to see more
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 246 ORDER granting 242 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re 1 Complaint

Document Piney et al v. City Of New York et al, 1:25-cv-00671, No. 246 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 20, 2025)
Motion to Extend TimeGranted
Dear Judge Cave, Our firm is counsel to Defendants Bryant Park Corporation and 34th Street Partnership, Inc. in the above-referenced matter.
We have entered an appearance today on their behaves, and we write to respectfully request that Your Honor grant us leave to join in the letter motion filed on March 17, 2025 by a group of 33 Defendants (Piney ECF 218), which seeks certain modifications to Your Honor's March 14, 2025 Orders (the "Orders") (Piney ECF 196).
As explained in the March 17 Letter Motion, the proposed modifications would further Rule 1's mandate "to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of [this] action" by allowing for coordinated briefing and responses after the Court decides on Plaintiffs' pending motions for consolidation and appointment of interim class counsel.
We agree with the arguments and suggestions made by the movants and believe that they would benefit all Parties 4930-2090-1675.1 and the Court by avoiding duplication, confusion, and inefficiency.
Respectfully, fairness suggests that Defendants should not be required to answer or move with respect to a pleading prior to the Court’s decision on whether to consolidate the case with other cases having separate pleadings, in some instances against the identical Defendants.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 259 ORDER denying without prejudice 204 Letter Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages; granting ...

Document Piney et al v. City Of New York et al, 1:25-cv-00671, No. 259 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 21, 2025)
Log in to see more
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 196 ORDER granting 193 Motion for Lisa A. Scherer to Appear Pro Hac Vice; granting 194 Motion ...

Document Piney et al v. City Of New York et al, 1:25-cv-00671, No. 196 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 14, 2025)
Motion to Appear Pro Hac ViceGranted
Log in to see more
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 145 ORDER, Defendants shall file any oppositions or responses to the Consolidation Motion by Friday, ...

Document Piney et al v. City Of New York et al, 1:25-cv-00671, No. 145 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 3, 2025)
Log in to see more
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 127 ORDER granting 114 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to File ; granting 116 Letter Motion ...

Document Piney et al v. City Of New York et al, 1:25-cv-00671, No. 127 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 27, 2025)
Log in to see more
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 588 ORDER granting 587 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney

Document Berall v. Teleflex Medical, Incorporated, 5:22-cv-00331, No. 588 (E.D.N.C. Feb. 25, 2025)
Motion to Withdraw as CounselGranted
Log in to see more
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 87 ORDER granting 32 Letter Motion for Leave to File Document; granting 37 Letter Motion for ...

Document Piney et al v. City Of New York et al, 1:25-cv-00671, No. 87 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 21, 2025)
Motion to File DocumentGranted
Log in to see more
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Commscope Technologies LLC v. Dali Wireless Inc.

Docket IPR2018-00571, Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Feb. 2, 2018)
Karl Easthom, Melissa Haapala, Sharon Fenick, presiding
Log in to see more
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

No. 42 ORDER OF REFERENCE TO A MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Document Piney et al v. City Of New York et al, 1:25-cv-00671, No. 42 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 14, 2025)
Log in to see more
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 583 ORDER granting 580 MOTION to Seal 578 PROPOSED SEALED Memorandum in Support, 579 PROPOSED SEALED ...

Document Berall v. Teleflex Medical, Incorporated, 5:22-cv-00331, No. 583 (E.D.N.C. Jan. 10, 2025)
Motion to SealGranted
Log in to see more
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Proposed Order

Document BARRETT VS THE TJX COMPANIES, INC., 221001405, No. 35-2 (Pennsylvania State, Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County, Civil Division Dec. 31, 2024)
Log in to see more
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 574 ORDER granting 573 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Motion for Attorneys' Fees

Document Berall v. Teleflex Medical, Incorporated, 5:22-cv-00331, No. 574 (E.D.N.C. Dec. 20, 2024)
Log in to see more
cite Cite Document
Analyze
<< 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... >>