• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Active Filters1
Displaying 54-68 of 158 results

No. 315 REPLY to Response to Motion re 293 MOTION to Strike 280 MOTION Decertification of the Conditionally ...

Document Deakin v. Magellan Health, Inc., et al, 1:17-cv-00773, No. 315 (D.N.M. Dec. 5, 2022)
Motion to Strike
This is strange assertion, as Defendants are arguing that, regardless of whether a summary complies with the strict requirements of Rule 1006, it must be considered by the Court if it is submitted prior to trial.1 Not only does this defy common sense, but it is the exact opposite of what
Again, relying on a single out-of-District opinion, Defendants state that Exhibit B was provided for the Court’s convenience and should be utilized by the Court “to locate specific information in the factual record.” See Resp., p. 4.
Defendants cite to Anderson Living Trust v. WPX Energy Prod., LLC to support their contention that a Rule 1006 summary should be admitted and considered by a court regardless of its accuracy.
If Defendants were allowed to include hundreds of citations and substantive statements in an extra exhibit, Plaintiffs would effectively be precluded from addressing those arguments in a 12-page reply brief.
2 Defendants’ use of the term “hyper-technical” is somewhat astonishing, given that it has moved to have entire motions dismissed for being submitted hours, or even minutes, after the applicable deadline (to say nothing of its current request to have one of Plaintiffs’ attorneys removed from the case based on the failure to provide an acknowledgment form to a witness represented by Defendants’ counsel).
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 65 MEMORANDUM OPINION denying 48 MOTION to Change Venue by District Judge James O. Browning

Document Coffin et al v. Magellan HRSC, Inc. et al, 1:20-cv-00144, No. 65 (D.N.M. Jun. 24, 2021)
... of 91 The key to the (b)(2) class is “the indivisible nature of the injunctive or declaratory remedy warranted -- the notion that the conduct is such that it can be enjoined or declared unlawful only as to all of the class members or as to none ...
Nonetheless, social change advocates tend to pursue class certification under Rule 23(b)(2) for several reasons.
The district court nonetheless certified the class.
None of the parties had even challenged the district court’s ruling that class certification required “that the damages resulting from . . . [the antitrust violation] were measurable ‘on a class- wide basis’ through use of a ‘common ...
The doctrine, nonetheless, “pertains both to rulings by district courts, see, e.g., Clark v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 590 F.3d 1134, 1140 (10th Cir. 2009),” as well as “by previous panels in prior appeals in the same litigation, see, e.g., ...
Magellan HRSC asserts that none of the Chrysler Credit Corp. elements exist in this case and thus that reconsidering Judge Bashant’s transfer decision is inappropriate.
None of the remaining discretionary factors in a consideration of a transfer decision warrant abandoning the law of the case.
Nonetheless, Judge Bashant transferred the case to the District of New Mexico.
cite Cite Document
Analyze
+ More Snippets

No. 293 MOTION to Strike 280 MOTION Decertification of the Conditionally Certified Collective Action ...

Document Deakin v. Magellan Health, Inc., et al, 1:17-cv-00773, No. 293 (D.N.M. Nov. 7, 2022)
Motion to Strike
Log in to see more
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 258 MOTION for Attorney Fees by Magellan HSRC, Inc., Magellan Health, Inc

Document Deakin v. Magellan Health, Inc., et al, 1:17-cv-00773, No. 258 (D.N.M. Sep. 21, 2022)
Motion for Attorney Fees
Log in to see more
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 19 ORDER ADOPTING 15 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by District Judge Judith C. Herrera; granting ...

Document Gormly v. City of Rio Rancho, New Mexico, 1:20-cv-00719, No. 19 (D.N.M. Mar. 29, 2021)
Log in to see more
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 247 MOTION for Protective Order as to Plaintiff's Noticed 30(b)(6) Deposition Topics by Magellan ...

Document Deakin v. Magellan Health, Inc., et al, 1:17-cv-00773, No. 247 (D.N.M. Aug. 16, 2022)
Motion for Protective Order
Log in to see more
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 239 MOTION for Leave to File Surreply by Maureen Deakin

Document Deakin v. Magellan Health, Inc., et al, 1:17-cv-00773, No. 239 (D.N.M. Aug. 1, 2022)
Motion to File
Log in to see more
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 15 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 9 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Magistrate Judge ...

Document Gormly v. City of Rio Rancho, New Mexico, 1:20-cv-00719, No. 15 (D.N.M. Feb. 9, 2021)
Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction
Log in to see more
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 237 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Chief District Judge William P. Johnson granting 222 Opposed ...

Document Munoz v. John Doe Corporations, 1:17-cv-00881, No. 237 (D.N.M. Dec. 11, 2020)
Motion to StrikeGranted
Log in to see more
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 236 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Chief District Judge William P. Johnson, granting 221 Opposed ...

Document Munoz v. John Doe Corporations, 1:17-cv-00881, No. 236 (D.N.M. Nov. 23, 2020)
Motion to StrikeGranted
Log in to see more
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 84

Document Candelaria v. Health Care Service Corporation, 2:17-cv-00404, No. 84 (D.N.M. Nov. 4, 2020)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 82

Document Candelaria v. Health Care Service Corporation, 2:17-cv-00404, No. 82 (D.N.M. Oct. 20, 2020)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 232

Document Munoz v. John Doe Corporations, 1:17-cv-00881, No. 232 (D.N.M. Oct. 16, 2020)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 80

Document Candelaria v. Health Care Service Corporation, 2:17-cv-00404, No. 80 (D.N.M. Oct. 9, 2020)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 78

Document Candelaria v. Health Care Service Corporation, 2:17-cv-00404, No. 78 (D.N.M. Oct. 2, 2020)

cite Cite Document
Analyze
<< 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 >>