• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Active Filters1
Displaying 69-83 of 19,395 results

No. 76 ORDER re 71 Unopposed MOTION for Issuance of Letter Rogatory

Document Advanced Silicon Technologies LLC v. NXP Semiconductors N.V. et al, 6:22-cv-00466, No. 76 (W.D.Tex. May. 17, 2023)
Jury Trial Demanded Order Granting AST's Unopposed Motion for Issuance of Letter of Request to Inspect Documents under the Hague Evidence Convention
Having considered Plaintiff Advanced Silicon Technologies LLC's Unopposed Motionfor Issuance of a Letter of Request to Allegro DVT, the Court GRANTSthe Motion.
Accordingly, the Court will execute the submitted Request for International Judicial Assistance with an original signature, to whichthe clerk will affix an original seal.
The Court will then transmit the executed Request to counsel for Plaintiff, who will transmit the Request to the appropriate authorities.
Honorable Alan D Albright United States District Judge
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 74 ORDER GRANTING 73 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Alex Ruge for Advanced Silicon ...

Document Advanced Silicon Technologies LLC v. NXP Semiconductors N.V. et al, 6:22-cv-00466, No. 74 (W.D.Tex. May. 12, 2023)
Motion to Appear Pro Hac ViceGranted
BE IT REMEMBERED on this day, there was presented to the Court the Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice filed by ALEX W. RUGE (“Applicant”), counsel for ADVANCED SILICON TECHNOLOGIES LLC and the Court, having reviewed the motion, enters the following order: IT IS ORDERED that the Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice is GRANTED, and Applicant may appear on behalf of ADVANCED SILICON TECHNOLOGIES LLC in the above case.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Applicant, if he/she has not already done so, shall immediately tender the amount of $100.00, made payable to: Clerk, U.S. District Court, in compliance with Local Court Rule AT-1(f)(2).
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if the corresponding Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice was e-filed, the attorney who filed the Motion on behalf of the Applicant is directed to notify the Applicant of this order.
IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that Applicant, pursuant to the Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing in Civil and Criminal cases in the Western District of Texas, shall register via your individual pacer account as a Pro Hac Vice user within 10 days of the date of this Order, if he/she has not previously done so on a prior case in this District.
SIGNED this the 12th day of May 2023.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

7 Notice Notice filing date accorded: Notice Notice filing date accorded

Document IPR2023-00408, No. 7 Notice Notice filing date accorded - Notice Notice filing date accorded (P.T.A.B. Feb. 10, 2023)
For more information, please consult the Office Patent Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed. Reg. 48756 (Aug. 14, 2012), which is available on the Board Web site at http://www.uspto.gov/PTAB.
Patent Owner is advised of the requirement to submit mandatory notice information under 37 C.F.R. § 42.8(a)(2) within 21 days of service of the petition.
The parties are advised that under 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c), recognition of counsel pro hac vice requires a showing of good cause.
The listings are provided for the convenience of parties involved in cases before the P T AB; the PTAB does not sponsor or endorse any particular organization’s alternative dispute resolution services.
If the parties actually engage in alternative dispute resolution, the PTAB would be interested to learn what mechanism (e.g., arbitration, Case IPR2023-00386 Patent No. 8,615,700 mediation, etc.) was used and the general result.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 64 ORDER GRANTING 63 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Briana D. Long for Advanced Silicon ...

Document Advanced Silicon Technologies LLC v. NXP Semiconductors N.V. et al, 6:22-cv-00466, No. 64 (W.D.Tex. Feb. 8, 2023)
Motion to Appear Pro Hac ViceGranted
BE IT REMEMBERED on this day, there was presented to the Court the Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice filed by BRIANA D. LONG (“Applicant”), counsel for ADVANCED SILICON TECHNOLOGIES LLC, and the Court, having reviewed the motion, enters the following order: IT IS ORDERED that the Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice is GRANTED, and Applicant may appear on behalf of ADVANCED SILICON TECHNOLOGIES LLC in the above case.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Applicant, if he/she has not already done so, shall immediately tender the amount of $100.00, made payable to: Clerk, U.S. District Court, in compliance with Local Court Rule AT-1(f)(2).
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if the corresponding Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice was e-filed, the attorney who filed the Motion on behalf of the Applicant is directed to notify the Applicant of this order.
IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that Applicant, pursuant to the Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing in Civil and Criminal cases in the Western District of Texas, shall register via your individual pacer account as a Pro Hac Vice user within 10 days of the date of this Order, if he/she has not previously done so on a prior case in this District.
SIGNED this the 8th day of February, 2023.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 65 ORDER GRANTING 62 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Angela J. Bubis for Advanced Silicon ...

Document Advanced Silicon Technologies LLC v. NXP Semiconductors N.V. et al, 6:22-cv-00466, No. 65 (W.D.Tex. Feb. 8, 2023)
Motion to Appear Pro Hac ViceGranted
BE IT REMEMBERED on this day, there was presented to the Court the Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice filed by ANGELA J. BUBIS (“Applicant”), counsel for ADVANCED SILICON TECHNOLOGIES LLC, and the Court, having reviewed the motion, enters the following order: IT IS ORDERED that the Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice is GRANTED, and Applicant may appear on behalf of ADVANCED SILICON TECHNOLOGIES LLC in the above case.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Applicant, if he/she has not already done so, shall immediately tender the amount of $100.00, made payable to: Clerk, U.S. District Court, in compliance with Local Court Rule AT-1(f)(2).
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if the corresponding Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice was e-filed, the attorney who filed the Motion on behalf of the Applicant is directed to notify the Applicant of this order.
IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that Applicant, pursuant to the Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing in Civil and Criminal cases in the Western District of Texas, shall register via your individual pacer account as a Pro Hac Vice user within 10 days of the date of this Order, if he/she has not previously done so on a prior case in this District.
SIGNED this the 8th day of February, 2023.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 67

Document Advanced Silicon Technologies LLC v. NXP Semiconductors N.V. et al, 6:22-cv-00466, No. 67 (W.D.Tex. Feb. 8, 2023)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 61

Document Advanced Silicon Technologies LLC v. NXP Semiconductors N.V. et al, 6:22-cv-00466, No. 61 (W.D.Tex. Jan. 25, 2023)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 59

Document Advanced Silicon Technologies LLC v. NXP Semiconductors N.V. et al, 6:22-cv-00466, No. 59 (W.D.Tex. Jan. 24, 2023)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 57

Document Advanced Silicon Technologies LLC v. NXP Semiconductors N.V. et al, 6:22-cv-00466, No. 57 (W.D.Tex. Jan. 12, 2023)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

13 Institution Decision Grant: Institution Decision Granting Institution of Inter Parte...

Document IPR2022-01171, No. 13 Institution Decision Grant - Institution Decision Granting Institution of Inter Partes Review 35 USC sec 314 (P.T.A.B. Dec. 19, 2022)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

14 Order Other: Order SCHEDULING ORDER

Document IPR2022-01171, No. 14 Order Other - Order SCHEDULING ORDER (P.T.A.B. Dec. 19, 2022)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 520

Document Egenera, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc., 1:16-cv-11613, No. 520 (D.Mass. Dec. 15, 2022)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

14 Order Other: SCHEDULING ORDER

Document IPR2022-01126, No. 14 Order Other - SCHEDULING ORDER (P.T.A.B. Nov. 29, 2022)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

13 Institution Decision Grant: Granting Institution of Inter Partes Review 35 USC § 3...

Document IPR2022-01126, No. 13 Institution Decision Grant - Granting Institution of Inter Partes Review 35 USC § 314 (P.T.A.B. Nov. 29, 2022)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

14 Order Other: CHEDULING ORDER

Document IPR2022-01126, No. 14 Order Other - CHEDULING ORDER (P.T.A.B. Nov. 29, 2022)

cite Cite Document
Analyze
<< 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... >>