Document
ALBERT M. WATSON PHOTOGRAPHY INC. v. ROBERT KARTHEISER ESQUIRE et al, 155000/2016, 253 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., New York County Jan. 13, 2022)
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the undersigned counsel for the pmiies to this action, that: 1.
Pursuant to tbe parties' January 11, 2022 status conference, the discove1y dates set forth in the Status Conference Order, So Ordered by Justice King on September 29, 2021, shall be extended to March 31, 2022; 2.
The next virtual status conference shall be on _______ ~-~ at ___ "-' 3.
The note of issue deadline shall be extended to ~"'-~~~-'-----'---c___3· and 4.
This stipulation may be executed in counterparts and a facsimile or scmmed signature shall have the same binding effect on all parties hereto as an original signature.
Cite Document
ALBERT M. WATSON PHOTOGRAPHY INC. v. ROBERT KARTHEISER ESQUIRE et al, 155000/2016, 253 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., New York County Jan. 13, 2022)
+ More Snippets
Document
Umer Alam v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK et al, 156873/2021, 9 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., New York County Dec. 22, 2021)
Clerk of the Court Supreme Court of the State of New York County of New York 60 Centre Street New York, New York 10007
Re: Umer Alam v. The City of New York et al. Index No. 156873/2021
To the Clerk of the Court:
Please accept for filing without charge this Motion to Dismiss the Complaint and Defendants’ Memorandum of Law in Support of their Motion to Dismiss the Complaint, for the above-captioned action.
This fee exemption is being claimed pursuant to Section 8019(d) of the Civil Practice Law and Rules.
Cite Document
Umer Alam v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK et al, 156873/2021, 9 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., New York County Dec. 22, 2021)
+ More Snippets
Document
Umer Alam v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK et al, 156873/2021, 13 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., New York County Dec. 22, 2021)
"In evaluating the settlement, the Court should keep in mind the unique ability of class and defense counsel to assess the potential risks and rewards of litigation .... " Id. (alteration in original) (internal quotation marks omitted).
This is to inform you of a hearing about an agreement to settle a class action relating to your right to request a beard for religious purposes in the New York Police Department (''NYPD").
You have submitted a request to wear a beard for religious purposes from the NYPD' s Office of Equal Employment Opportunity between the period of June 22, 2013 and the present.
The Settlement Agreement requires the NYPD to change the policy for making a request to wear a beard based on a sincerely held religious belief.
If you exclude yourself from the Class, you will retain your right to sue individually by hiring your own lawyer and proving your own claims, assuming the time has not already passed for you to bring a separate lawsuit.
Cite Document
Umer Alam v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK et al, 156873/2021, 13 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., New York County Dec. 22, 2021)
+ More Snippets
Document
Umer Alam v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK et al, 156873/2021, 14 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., New York County Dec. 22, 2021)
Cite Document
Umer Alam v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK et al, 156873/2021, 14 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., New York County Dec. 22, 2021)
+ More Snippets
Document
Lewis v. City of New York, 1:21-cv-07528, No. 16 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 21, 2021)
Cite Document
Lewis v. City of New York, 1:21-cv-07528, No. 16 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 21, 2021)
+ More Snippets
Document
Lewis v. City of New York, 1:21-cv-07528, No. 14 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 15, 2021)
Cite Document
Lewis v. City of New York, 1:21-cv-07528, No. 14 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 15, 2021)
+ More Snippets
Document
ALBERT M. WATSON PHOTOGRAPHY INC. v. ROBERT KARTHEISER ESQUIRE et al, 155000/2016, 250 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., New York County Nov. 30, 2021)
Cite Document
ALBERT M. WATSON PHOTOGRAPHY INC. v. ROBERT KARTHEISER ESQUIRE et al, 155000/2016, 250 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., New York County Nov. 30, 2021)
+ More Snippets
Document
Umer Alam v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK et al, 156873/2021, 31 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., New York County Jan. 9, 2024)
Cite Document
Umer Alam v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK et al, 156873/2021, 31 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., New York County Jan. 9, 2024)
+ More Snippets
Docket
160258/2014,
New York State, New York County, Supreme Court
(Oct. 20, 2014)
Frank P Nervo,
presiding.
Cite Docket
Wayne Baum v. The City of New York, 160258/2014 (New York State, New York County, Supreme Court)
+ More Snippets
Document
Robin Stroble v. Tes Ave U, LLC et al, 23582/2017E, 176 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., Bronx County Oct. 22, 2021)
Cite Document
Robin Stroble v. Tes Ave U, LLC et al, 23582/2017E, 176 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., Bronx County Oct. 22, 2021)
+ More Snippets
Document
Robin Stroble v. Tes Ave U, LLC et al, 23582/2017E, 175 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., Bronx County Oct. 22, 2021)
Cite Document
Robin Stroble v. Tes Ave U, LLC et al, 23582/2017E, 175 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., Bronx County Oct. 22, 2021)
+ More Snippets
Document
Umer Alam v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK et al, 156873/2021, 30 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., New York County Dec. 4, 2023)
Cite Document
Umer Alam v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK et al, 156873/2021, 30 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., New York County Dec. 4, 2023)
+ More Snippets
Document
Robin Stroble v. Tes Ave U, LLC et al, 23582/2017E, 174 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., Bronx County Oct. 15, 2021)
Cite Document
Robin Stroble v. Tes Ave U, LLC et al, 23582/2017E, 174 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., Bronx County Oct. 15, 2021)
+ More Snippets
Document
ALBERT M. WATSON PHOTOGRAPHY INC. v. ROBERT KARTHEISER ESQUIRE et al, 155000/2016, 249 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., New York County Oct. 4, 2021)
Cite Document
ALBERT M. WATSON PHOTOGRAPHY INC. v. ROBERT KARTHEISER ESQUIRE et al, 155000/2016, 249 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., New York County Oct. 4, 2021)
+ More Snippets
Document
ALBERT M. WATSON PHOTOGRAPHY INC. v. ROBERT KARTHEISER ESQUIRE et al, 155000/2016, 248 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., New York County Sep. 30, 2021)
Cite Document
ALBERT M. WATSON PHOTOGRAPHY INC. v. ROBERT KARTHEISER ESQUIRE et al, 155000/2016, 248 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., New York County Sep. 30, 2021)
+ More Snippets