Nonetheless, FNF, even without knowledge of any discovery dispute since Plaintiff never met and conferred with FNF about this topic, offered to produce the information to Plaintiff, but Plaintiff declined in favor of filing an untimely and ...

Type of proceeding: Set on (date): Before (name of judicial officer, if known): at (time): in (department): The person intends to appear by (check court's website for method that may be used): Videoconference Audio only (including telephone) For evidentiary hearing or trial only (where testimony may be given): the party requests the following additional aspects of the (describe what the party wants to be done remotely and why; attach form MC-25 if more proceeding be conducted remotely space is needed): Form Adopted for Mandatory Use Judicial Council of California RA-010 [New January 1, 2022]

Notice may be provided orally, electronically, or by giving the other parties this form in a way to ensure it is received by the applicable deadline.

On October 3, 2023, I served the foregoing document(s) described as NOTICE OF REMOTE APPEARANCE, on all interested parties in this action as set forth on the attached service list in the following manner: BY MAIL: I am familiar with this firm’s practice of collection and processing correspondence for mailing.

Under that practice it would be deposited with the United States Postal Service on that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid at Los Angeles, California in the ordinary course of business.

BY OVERNIGHT MAIL: I caused said document(s) to be picked up via FEDERAL EXPRESS for delivery to the addressee(s) set forth on the attached service list on the next business day.

This matter came on regularly before the Court for a hearing on October 18, 2023, at 3:30 p.m.

The Court, having reviewed the moving, opposing, and reply papers on Plaintiff BINDYA NAGRANI’s (hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiff”) Motion for an order compelling Defendant F-N-F ROLL-OFF SERVICE, INC. (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant”) to serve further responses and document production to Plaintiff’s Request for Production, Set One (1), No. 24.

The Court finds, adjudges and orders as follows:

Defendant is hereby ordered to serve full and complete further responses and document production to Plaintiff’s Request for Production, Set One (1), No. 24.

That monetary sanctions be imposed against Defendant and its counsel, Hawkins Parnell & Young, LLP, in the sum of $1,710.00.