• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Active Filters1
Displaying 54-68 of 298,124 results

25 Order Other: Order Revised Scheduling Order

Document IPR2023-00197, No. 25 Order Other - Order Revised Scheduling Order (P.T.A.B. Jan. 31, 2024)
8 IPR2023-00197 Patent 10,894,503 B2 weeks after the filing of an opposition to the motion to amend (or the due date for the opposition, if none is filed) for the Board to issue its preliminary guidance, if requested by Patent Owner.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

26 Order on Motion: ORDER Setting Oral Argument 37 CFR § 4270

Document IPR2022-01586, No. 26 Order on Motion - ORDER Setting Oral Argument 37 CFR § 4270 (P.T.A.B. Jan. 23, 2024)
In instances where an advocate does not meet the LEAP eligibility requirements due to the number of “substantive” oral hearing arguments, but nonetheless has a basis for considering themselves to be in the category of advocates that ...
cite Cite Document
Analyze

23 Notice Other: Institution decision and grant of joinder, IPR2023 01225

Document IPR2023-00315, No. 23 Notice Other - Institution decision and grant of joinder, IPR2023 01225 (P.T.A.B. Jan. 22, 2024)
Porsche Cars North America, Inc. (“Petitioner”) filed a Petition (Paper 1, “Pet.”) requesting inter partes review of claims 24–55 of U.S. Patent No. 9,955,551 B2 (Ex. 1001, “the ’551 patent”).
An inter partes review may not be instituted unless “the information presented in the petition ... and any response ... shows that there is a reasonable likelihood that the petitioner would prevail with respect to at least 1 of the claims challenged in the petition.” 35 U.S.C. § 314(a).
With LEDs having a variety of aims, the headlamp’s light distribution pattern may be controlled based on a number of factors, including detected oncoming vehicles.
This arrangement promotes the just and efficient administration of the ongoing trial in the VW IPR and protects the interests of VW as original petitioner in IPR2023-00315 and of Patent Owner.
For the reasons discussed above, we institute inter partes review of the challenged claims of the ’551 patent based on the asserted grounds.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

10 Institution Decision Joined: Institution Decision Joined

Document IPR2023-01231, No. 10 Institution Decision Joined - Institution Decision Joined (P.T.A.B. Jan. 19, 2024)
Porsche Cars North America, Inc. (“Petitioner”) filed a Petition (Paper 2, “Pet.”) requesting inter partes review of claims 20–25 and 59–64 of U.S. Patent No. 10,894,503 B2 (Ex. 1001, “the ’503 patent”).
An inter partes review may not be instituted unless “the information presented in the petition ... and any response ... shows that there is a reasonable likelihood that the petitioner would prevail with respect to at least 1 of the claims challenged in the petition.” 35 U.S.C. § 314(a).
Different LED 277, which is “at a second location within the same cluster[,] may have a similar or dissimilar aiming, wavelength and spatial light distribution.” Id. at 53:19–32.
Petitioner timely filed its Motion for Joinder on July 20, 2023, which was no later than one month after the institution of the VW IPR on June 21, 2023.
For the reasons discussed above, we institute inter partes review of the challenged claims of the ’503 patent based on the asserted grounds.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

3 Notice Notice filing date accorded: Notice NOTICE OF FILING DATE ACCORDED TO PETITION AND TIME FOR FILING PATENT OWNER PRELIMINARY RESPONSE

Document IPR2024-00119, No. 3 Notice Notice filing date accorded - Notice NOTICE OF FILING DATE ACCORDED TO PETITION AND TIME FOR FILING PATENT OWNER PRELIMINARY RESPONSE (P....
For more information, please consult the Office Patent Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed. Reg. 48756 (Aug. 14, 2012), which is available on the Board Web site at http://www.uspto.gov/PTAB.
Patent Owner is advised of the requirement to submit mandatory notice information under 37 C.F.R. § 42.8(a)(2) within 21 days of service of the petition.
The parties are advised that under 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c), recognition of counsel pro hac vice requires a showing of good cause.
Many non-profit organizations, both inside and outside the intellectual property field, offer alternative dispute resolution services.
If the parties actually engage in alternative dispute resolution, the PTAB would be interested to learn what mechanism (e.g., arbitration, Case IPR2024-00119 Patent No. 11,415,760 mediation, etc.) was used and the general result.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

25 Notice Other: Institution decision and grant of joinder, IPR2023 01122

Document IPR2022-01586, No. 25 Notice Other - Institution decision and grant of joinder, IPR2023 01122 (P.T.A.B. Jan. 16, 2024)
Porsche Cars North America, Inc. (“Petitioner”) filed a Petition (Paper 2, “Pet.”) requesting inter partes review of claims 1–33 of U.S. Patent No. 11,208,029 B2 (Ex. 1001, “the ’029 patent”).
An inter partes review may not be instituted unless “the information presented in the petition ... and any response ... shows that there is a reasonable likelihood that the petitioner would prevail with respect to at least 1 of the claims challenged in the petition.” 35 U.S.C. § 314(a).
With LEDs having a variety of aims, the headlamp’s light distribution pattern may be controlled based on a number of factors, including location data from a GPS system, providing information about upcoming curves in the road.
This arrangement promotes the just and efficient administration of the ongoing trial in the VW IPR and protects the interests of VW as original petitioner in IPR2022-01586 and of Patent Owner.
For the reasons discussed above, we institute inter partes review of the challenged claims of the ’029 patent based on the asserted grounds.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

19 Order denying Directors Review of Institution Decision: Order Denying Director Review

Document IPR2023-00328, No. 19 Order denying Directors Review of Institution Decision - Order Denying Director Review (P.T.A.B. Oct. 6, 2023)
Before KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office.
The Office received requests for Director Review of the Decisions on Institution for the above-captioned cases.
The requests were referred to me.
Upon consideration of the requests, it is: ORDERED that the requests for Director Review are denied.
IPR2023-00328 (Patent 10,894,503 B2) IPR2023-00335 (Patent 10,894,503 B2) For PETITIONER: Michel Specht Jason Fitzsimmons Daniel Yonan Ian Soule
cite Cite Document
Analyze

19 Order denying Director Review of Institution Decision: Order Denying Director Review

Document IPR2023-00328, No. 19 Order denying Director Review of Institution Decision - Order Denying Director Review (P.T.A.B. Oct. 6, 2023)
Log in to see more
cite Cite Document
Analyze

18 Order denying Director Review of Institution Decision: Order Denying Director Review

Document IPR2023-00335, No. 18 Order denying Director Review of Institution Decision - Order Denying Director Review (P.T.A.B. Oct. 6, 2023)
Log in to see more
cite Cite Document
Analyze

18 Order denying Directors Review of Institution Decision: Order Denying Director Review

Document IPR2023-00335, No. 18 Order denying Directors Review of Institution Decision - Order Denying Director Review (P.T.A.B. Oct. 6, 2023)
Log in to see more
cite Cite Document
Analyze

18 Order Denying Director Review of Institution Decision: Order Denying Director Review

Document IPR2023-00335, No. 18 Order Denying Director Review of Institution Decision - Order Denying Director Review (P.T.A.B. Oct. 6, 2023)
Log in to see more
cite Cite Document
Analyze

14 Notice refund approved: Notice refund approved

Document IPR2023-00336, No. 14 Notice refund approved - Notice refund approved (P.T.A.B. Sep. 29, 2023)
Log in to see more
cite Cite Document
Analyze

5 Notice Notice filing date accorded: Notice Notice filing date accorded

Document IPR2023-01231, No. 5 Notice Notice filing date accorded - Notice Notice filing date accorded (P.T.A.B. Jul. 26, 2023)
Log in to see more
cite Cite Document
Analyze

11 Institution Decision Grant: Institution Decision DECISION Granting Institution of Inter Partes Review 35 USC § 314

Document IPR2023-00335, No. 11 Institution Decision Grant - Institution Decision DECISION Granting Institution of Inter Partes Review 35 USC § 314 (P.T.A.B. Jul. 17, 2023)
Log in to see more
cite Cite Document
Analyze

12 Order Other: Order Scheduling Order

Document IPR2023-00335, No. 12 Order Other - Order Scheduling Order (P.T.A.B. Jul. 17, 2023)
Log in to see more
cite Cite Document
Analyze
<< 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... >>