Document
Alice Smithen v. United States of America et al, 2:09-cv-00414, No. 102 (C.D.Cal. Jul. 29, 2015)
The attorney listed above has already appeared as counsel of record in this case and should have been added to the docket.
Please select one of thefollowing options: D The attorney named above has already been relieved by the Court as counsel of record in this case and should have been removed from the docket.
Date of the order relieving this attorney: Please remove the attorney named above from the docket of this case; at least one member of the firm or agency named above, and at least one member of the Bar of this Court, will continue to serve as counsel of record for the party or parties indicated.
(Note: ifyou are rernovingyourselffrom the docket ofthis case as a result ofseparatingfrom afirm or agency, you should consult Local Rules 5—4.8.1 and 83—2.4 and Form G-06 (“Notice ofChange of/lttorney Business or Contact Information”), concerningyour obligations to notify the Clerk and parties ofchanges in your business or contact information.)
The represented party has been dismissed from the case, but the attorneys are still receiving notices of electronic filing.
Cite Document
Alice Smithen v. United States of America et al, 2:09-cv-00414, No. 102 (C.D.Cal. Jul. 29, 2015)
+ More Snippets
Document
Alice Smithen v. United States of America et al, 2:09-cv-00414, No. 101 (C.D.Cal. Jul. 29, 2015)
The attorney listed above has already appeared as counsel of record in this case and should have been added to the docket.
Please select one of the following options: D The attorney named above has already been relieved by the Court as counsel of record in this case and should have been removed from the docket.
Date of the order relieving this attorney: Please remove the attorney named above from the docket of this case; at least one member of the firm or agency named above, and at least one member of the Bar of this Court, will continue to serve as counsel of record for the party or parties indicated.
ifyou are removingyourselffrom the docket of this case as a result ofseparatingfrom afirm or agency, you (Note: should consult Local Rules 54.8.1 and 8.3-2.4 and Form G—06 (“Notice ofChange ofAtt0rney Business or Contact Information”), concerningyour obligations to notify the Clerk and parties ofchanges in your business or contact information.)
The represented party has been dismissed from the case, but the attorneys are still receiving notices of electronic filing.
Cite Document
Alice Smithen v. United States of America et al, 2:09-cv-00414, No. 101 (C.D.Cal. Jul. 29, 2015)
+ More Snippets
Document
Alice Smithen v. United States of America et al, 2:09-cv-00414, No. 99 (C.D.Cal. Jul. 21, 2015)
United States Attorney Southern District of California
Pursuant to the Court’s Order (Dkt. 98), a status conference is scheduled for July 27, 2015 at 8:30 a.m.
CV 09-414-GW (PJWx) Joint Report Re: July 27, 2015 Status Conference
Pursuant to the Court’s direction, the parties also will for now refrain from seeking rulings on any of the overlapping legal issues.
During court proceedings on July 21, 2015, Judge Gutierrez indicated that he expects the trial to last approximately 12 days.
Cite Document
Alice Smithen v. United States of America et al, 2:09-cv-00414, No. 99 (C.D.Cal. Jul. 21, 2015)
+ More Snippets
Document
John Doe et al v County of Los Angeles et al, 2:16-cv-05946, No. 42-1 (C.D.Cal. Dec. 27, 2016)
IFiled concurrently with Notice and Motion for Temporary Stay of Action and IProposed] Orderl Complaint filed: 0710112016 Trial date: 0812212017
I have personal knowledge of the facts set forth in this declaration, and if called upon to testify thereto I woutd and could do so both competently and truthfully.
She is charged with false imprisonment and dissuading a witness, to which she has pled not guilty on both counts.
At Ms. Wycoff s arraignment on December 19,2016, the court scheduled the case for trial on February 17,2017 .
2016 Decenrber 19,2016 December 19, 2016 Sail To $tand BailTo Stand SENTENCI t{G I N FCIR \4AT}ON THE INFORN4ATION PROVIDED ON THIS !
Cite Document
John Doe et al v County of Los Angeles et al, 2:16-cv-05946, No. 42-1 (C.D.Cal. Dec. 27, 2016)
+ More Snippets
Document
John Doe et al v County of Los Angeles et al, 2:16-cv-05946, No. 42-2 (C.D.Cal. Dec. 27, 2016)
January 30, 2017 Date: Time: 9:00 A.M. Room: 850 [Filed concurrently with Notice of Motion and Motion for Temporary Stay of Action and Declaration of Robert Oliver] Complaint filed: 07/01/2016 Trial date: 08/22/2017 JOHN DOE, et al.
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, et al.
Defendant Christine Wycoff’s Motion for Temporary Stay of Action (“Motion”) came before this Court on January 30, 2017 at 9:00 a.m. Having read and considered the Motion, supporting declarations, and exhibits, the opposition to the Motion, the reply to the opposition, the Court hereby GRANTS the Motion as follows: 1.
All proceedings in this action are stayed until __________________________; 2.
A case status conference is set for ___________________________, at which time the Court shall consider the lifting of the stay in this action.
Cite Document
John Doe et al v County of Los Angeles et al, 2:16-cv-05946, No. 42-2 (C.D.Cal. Dec. 27, 2016)
+ More Snippets
Document
Alice Smithen v. United States of America et al, 2:09-cv-00414, No. 98 (C.D.Cal. May. 4, 2015)
Case No. CV 09-414-GW(PJWx) Alice Smithen v. United States of America, et al.
Title Date May 4, 2015 Present: The Honorable GEORGE H. WU, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Javier Gonzalez Katie Thibodeaux Tape No. Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants: Michael J. Grobaty Ernest Cordero, Jr., AUSA - by telephone Greg Yacoubian - by telephone
Counsel for the government advises the Court that the criminal trial begins in July 2015.
The Court continues the status conference to July 27, 2015 at 8:30 a.m. Parties will file a joint status report by noon on July 23, 2015.
Telephonic appearances will be allowed provided that notice is given to the clerk two business days prior to the hearing.
Cite Document
Alice Smithen v. United States of America et al, 2:09-cv-00414, No. 98 (C.D.Cal. May. 4, 2015)
+ More Snippets
Document
Alice Smithen v. United States of America et al, 2:09-cv-00414, No. 97 (C.D.Cal. Apr. 27, 2015)
United States Attorney Southern District of California
The purpose of the conference is to update the Court on the status of this case and a parallel criminal case (United States v. Matthew Itkowitz, Case No. CR 12-837-PSG) which is pending against Matthew Itkowitz, a defendant in this civil matter.
In this regard, the parties are proceeding with deposition discovery.
Pursuant to the Court’s direction, the parties also will for now refrain from seeking rulings on any of the overlapping legal issues.
Dated: April 27, 2015 CV 09-414-GW (PJWx) Joint Report Re: May 4, 2015 Status Conference
Cite Document
Alice Smithen v. United States of America et al, 2:09-cv-00414, No. 97 (C.D.Cal. Apr. 27, 2015)
+ More Snippets
Document
John Doe et al v County of Los Angeles et al, 2:16-cv-05946, No. 19-3 (C.D.Cal. Sep. 8, 2016)
Cite Document
John Doe et al v County of Los Angeles et al, 2:16-cv-05946, No. 19-3 (C.D.Cal. Sep. 8, 2016)
+ More Snippets
Document
John Doe et al v County of Los Angeles et al, 2:16-cv-05946, No. 19-4 (C.D.Cal. Sep. 8, 2016)
Cite Document
John Doe et al v County of Los Angeles et al, 2:16-cv-05946, No. 19-4 (C.D.Cal. Sep. 8, 2016)
+ More Snippets
Document
John Doe et al v County of Los Angeles et al, 2:16-cv-05946, No. 19-1 (C.D.Cal. Sep. 8, 2016)
Cite Document
John Doe et al v County of Los Angeles et al, 2:16-cv-05946, No. 19-1 (C.D.Cal. Sep. 8, 2016)
+ More Snippets
Document
John Doe et al v County of Los Angeles et al, 2:16-cv-05946, No. 19-2 (C.D.Cal. Sep. 8, 2016)
Cite Document
John Doe et al v County of Los Angeles et al, 2:16-cv-05946, No. 19-2 (C.D.Cal. Sep. 8, 2016)
+ More Snippets
Document
Glenn Ason vs. Jung Koh, 56-2013-00434773-CU-FR-VTA, No. 4F79ECFE-B1D7-4A85-8D9E-8FA39547B1F0 (California State, Ventura County, Superior Court Mar. 2, 2015)
Cite Document
Glenn Ason vs. Jung Koh, 56-2013-00434773-CU-FR-VTA, No. 4F79ECFE-B1D7-4A85-8D9E-8FA39547B1F0 (California State, Ventura County, Superior Court Mar. 2, 2015)
+ More Snippets
Docket
SC045087,
California State, Ventura County, Superior Court
(Dec. 27, 2005)
Cite Docket
KS CONCEPTS VS ROMEO GREGORY, SC045087 (California State, Ventura County, Superior Court)
+ More Snippets
Document
Glenn Ason vs. Jung Koh, 56-2013-00434773-CU-FR-VTA, No. 680664D5-C70A-4DD6-AA6B-A305F68567B8 (California State, Ventura County, Superior Court Feb. 19, 2015)
Cite Document
Glenn Ason vs. Jung Koh, 56-2013-00434773-CU-FR-VTA, No. 680664D5-C70A-4DD6-AA6B-A305F68567B8 (California State, Ventura County, Superior Court Feb. 19, 2015)
+ More Snippets
Document
Alice Smithen v. United States of America et al, 2:09-cv-00414, No. 167-1 (C.D.Cal. Mar. 1, 2017)
Cite Document
Alice Smithen v. United States of America et al, 2:09-cv-00414, No. 167-1 (C.D.Cal. Mar. 1, 2017)
+ More Snippets