• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Active Filters1
Displaying 129-143 of 266 results

No. 120 REPLY Brief in Support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Both of Plaintiff's ...

Document Alice Smithen v. United States of America et al, 2:09-cv-00414, No. 120 (C.D.Cal. Feb. 12, 2016)
Motion for Summary Judgment
Matthew Itkowitz’s (“Itkowitz”) Reply Brief is based upon the argument herein, the Reply Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Defendant United States’ Motion for Summary Judgment, United States’ Request for Evidentiary Rulings on Specified Objections, United States’ Response to Statement of Genuine Disputes, (all of which Itkowitz understands will be filed concurrently), the files and records in this case, and any additional evidence and argument that may be presented at or before the hearing on this motion.
Notably, during those meet and confer sessions, Plaintiff’s counsel specifically raised the issue of “Supplemental Jurisdiction” as a ‘fallback’ position should this court dismiss “all claims over which it had original jurisdiction”, as indicated in Plaintiff’s Opposition.
Also, Plaintiff’s recent retention of Roger Clark for his expert opinion and testimony has created further financial hardship.
In addition to existing financial hardship, Itkowitz is unable to retain a similar expert to reply to Clark’s Declaration, which was included in Plaintiff’s Opposition to the instant Motion for Summary Judgment.
In the alternative, Itkowitz moves to dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint in its entirety since the Court would not have subject matter jurisdiction.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 121 REPLY in Support NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Complaint 110 filed ...

Document Alice Smithen v. United States of America et al, 2:09-cv-00414, No. 121 (C.D.Cal. Feb. 12, 2016)
Motion for Summary Judgment
Log in to see more
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 114 STATEMENT of Genuine Disputes NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Complaint ...

Document Alice Smithen v. United States of America et al, 2:09-cv-00414, No. 114 (C.D.Cal. Feb. 8, 2016)
Log in to see more
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 115

Document Alice Smithen v. United States of America et al, 2:09-cv-00414, No. 115 (C.D.Cal. Feb. 8, 2016)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 30

Document John Doe et al v County of Los Angeles et al, 2:16-cv-05946, No. 30 (C.D.Cal. Oct. 14, 2016)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 31

Document John Doe et al v County of Los Angeles et al, 2:16-cv-05946, No. 31 (C.D.Cal. Oct. 14, 2016)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 32

Document John Doe et al v County of Los Angeles et al, 2:16-cv-05946, No. 32 (C.D.Cal. Oct. 14, 2016)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 109

Document Alice Smithen v. United States of America et al, 2:09-cv-00414, No. 109 (C.D.Cal. Feb. 1, 2016)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 110

Document Alice Smithen v. United States of America et al, 2:09-cv-00414, No. 110 (C.D.Cal. Feb. 1, 2016)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 26

Document John Doe et al v County of Los Angeles et al, 2:16-cv-05946, No. 26 (C.D.Cal. Sep. 27, 2016)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 29

Document John Doe et al v County of Los Angeles et al, 2:16-cv-05946, No. 29 (C.D.Cal. Sep. 27, 2016)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 24

Document John Doe et al v County of Los Angeles et al, 2:16-cv-05946, No. 24 (C.D.Cal. Sep. 26, 2016)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 25

Document John Doe et al v County of Los Angeles et al, 2:16-cv-05946, No. 25 (C.D.Cal. Sep. 26, 2016)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 23

Document John Doe et al v County of Los Angeles et al, 2:16-cv-05946, No. 23 (C.D.Cal. Sep. 20, 2016)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 21

Document John Doe et al v County of Los Angeles et al, 2:16-cv-05946, No. 21 (C.D.Cal. Sep. 12, 2016)

cite Cite Document
Analyze
<< 1 2 3 4 5 ... 9 10 11 12 13 ... 17 18 19 >>