• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Active Filters1
Displaying 84-98 of 108 results

No. 19-1 EX PARTE APPLICATION for Extension of Time to File Response to Initial Complaint by Not More ...

Document John Doe et al v County of Los Angeles et al, 2:16-cv-05946, No. 19-1 (C.D.Cal. Sep. 8, 2016)
The Defendants current deadline to respond to the Complaint was August 29, 2016.
The parties’ have stipulated to an extension of time for Defendants to respond to the initial complaint.
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b)(1)(B) allows for the Court to, for good cause, extend the time “on a motion made after the time has expired if the party failed to act because of excusable neglect.” In this instance, Defendants reasonably believed, based upon Plaintiffs’ agreement to extend the Defendants time to respond and to not seek default against Defendants until September 30, 2016, that they had additional time to respond to the Complaint.
Additionally, pursuant to Local Rule 8-3, the Defendants obtained the approval and agreement from the Plaintiffs and other Defendants for an extension in the form of a Stipulation, however since the time to respond has already lapsed, Defendants are respectfully seeking this ex parte relief from the Court for an order granting them an extension of time to respond to the Complaint extending the deadline from August 29, 2016, to September 27, 2016.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 19-2 EX PARTE APPLICATION for Extension of Time to File Response to Initial Complaint by Not More ...

Document John Doe et al v County of Los Angeles et al, 2:16-cv-05946, No. 19-2 (C.D.Cal. Sep. 8, 2016)
Log in to see more
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 35-1 REQUEST TO SUBSTITUTE ATTORNEY Richard R. Clouse in place of attorney Gregory Levon Kirakosian ...

Document John Doe et al v County of Los Angeles et al, 2:16-cv-05946, No. 35-1 (C.D.Cal. Nov. 9, 2016)
Log in to see more
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 30-1

Document John Doe et al v County of Los Angeles et al, 2:16-cv-05946, No. 30-1 (C.D.Cal. Oct. 14, 2016)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 32-2

Document John Doe et al v County of Los Angeles et al, 2:16-cv-05946, No. 32-2 (C.D.Cal. Oct. 14, 2016)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 32-1

Document John Doe et al v County of Los Angeles et al, 2:16-cv-05946, No. 32-1 (C.D.Cal. Oct. 14, 2016)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 25-4

Document John Doe et al v County of Los Angeles et al, 2:16-cv-05946, No. 25-4 (C.D.Cal. Sep. 26, 2016)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 25-2

Document John Doe et al v County of Los Angeles et al, 2:16-cv-05946, No. 25-2 (C.D.Cal. Sep. 26, 2016)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 25-5

Document John Doe et al v County of Los Angeles et al, 2:16-cv-05946, No. 25-5 (C.D.Cal. Sep. 26, 2016)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 25-3

Document John Doe et al v County of Los Angeles et al, 2:16-cv-05946, No. 25-3 (C.D.Cal. Sep. 26, 2016)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 25-1

Document John Doe et al v County of Los Angeles et al, 2:16-cv-05946, No. 25-1 (C.D.Cal. Sep. 26, 2016)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 25-6

Document John Doe et al v County of Los Angeles et al, 2:16-cv-05946, No. 25-6 (C.D.Cal. Sep. 26, 2016)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 23-3

Document John Doe et al v County of Los Angeles et al, 2:16-cv-05946, No. 23-3 (C.D.Cal. Sep. 20, 2016)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 23-2

Document John Doe et al v County of Los Angeles et al, 2:16-cv-05946, No. 23-2 (C.D.Cal. Sep. 20, 2016)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 23-4

Document John Doe et al v County of Los Angeles et al, 2:16-cv-05946, No. 23-4 (C.D.Cal. Sep. 20, 2016)

cite Cite Document
Analyze
<< 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 >>