Search court records - party Christian Camarce, page 9

All Courts
Federal Courts
Bankruptcies
PTAB
ITC

Filters

Display dockets
Display documents
- Decisions and Orders
- Exhibits
- Briefs and Motions
- Pleadings
- x Reset Selection

Like full text docket searches?

Get docket alerts, perform legal research, get updates of major decisions and orders, use our advanced analytics, and more. Request a Demo or create your account.

Displaying 114-128 of 50,000 results

sorted by

33 Order: Denying Change to Rescheduled Due Date 7

Document IPR2015-01977, No. 33 Order - Denying Change to Rescheduled Due Date 7 (P.T.A.B. Oct. 13, 2016)

- Denied

2 IPR2015-01965 (Patent 7,884,713 B1) IPR2015-01977 (Patent 6,924,727 B2) 7, and Patent Owner informed us that none of its counsel has a conflict with the rescheduled Due Date 7.3 Nevertheless, in an effort to accommodate ...

Cite Document

Analyze

Search within this case
Analyze Judge
Analyze Party
- alarm.com
Analyze Firm
- Cravath, Swaine & Moore
- Sughrue Mion

38 Order: Order Oral Argument

Document IPR2015-01977, No. 38 Order - Order Oral Argument (P.T.A.B. Oct. 26, 2016)

Patent Owner, Vivint, Incorporated (“Vivint”), requests thirty (30) minutes, in total, to present arguments in Case IPR2015-01965 (Paper 31), and requests seventy-five (75) minutes, in total, to present arguments in Case IPR2015-01977 (Paper 36).

The parties must initiate a conference call with us at least two (2) business days prior to the hearing date to resolve any dispute over the propriety of each party’s demonstrative exhibits.

For further guidance on what constitutes an appropriate demonstrative exhibit, the parties are directed to CBS Interactive Inc. v. Helferich Patent Licensing, LLC, Case IPR2013-00033 (PTAB Oct. 23, 2013) (Paper 118).

We take this opportunity to remind the parties that each presenter must identify clearly and specifically each demonstrative exhibit, e.g., by slide or screen number, referenced during the hearing to ensure the clarity and accuracy of the reporter’s transcript.

The parties also should note that two members of the panel will be attending the hearing electronically from remote locations.

Cite Document

Analyze

Search within this case
Analyze Judge
Analyze Party
- alarm.com
Analyze Firm
- Cravath, Swaine & Moore
- Sughrue Mion

8 Notice of Filing Date Accorded to Petition: Notice of Filing Date Accorded to Petition

Document IPR2016-00161, No. 8 Notice of Filing Date Accorded to Petition - Notice of Filing Date Accorded to Petition (P.T.A.B. Nov. 13, 2015)

Patent Owner may file a preliminary response to the petition no later than three months from the date of this notice.

For more information, please consult the Office Patent Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed. Reg. 48756 (Aug. 14, 2012), which is available on the Board Web site at http://www.uspto.gov/PTAB.

Patent Owner is advised of the requirement to submit mandatory notice information under 37 C.F.R. § 42.8(a)(2) within 21 days of service of the petition.

The parties are advised that under 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c), recognition of counsel pro hac vice requires a showing of good cause.

Such motions shall be filed in accordance with the “Order -- Authorizing Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission” in Case IPR2013-00639, Paper 7, a copy of which is available on the Board Web site under “Representative Orders, Decisions, and Notices.” The parties are reminded that unless otherwise permitted by 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(b)(2), all filings in this proceeding must be made electronically in the Patent Review Processing System (PRPS), accessible from the Board Web site at http://www.uspto.gov/PTAB.

Cite Document

Analyze

Search within this case
Analyze Judge
Analyze Party
- alarm.com
Analyze Firm
- Cravath, Swaine & Moore
- Sughrue Mion

4 Notice Notice filing date accorded: Notice Notice filing date accorded

Document IPR2021-01283, No. 4 Notice Notice filing date accorded - Notice Notice filing date accorded (P.T.A.B. Sep. 9, 2021)

For more information, please consult the Office Patent Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed. Reg. 48756 (Aug. 14, 2012), which is available on the Board Web site at http://www.uspto.gov/PTAB.

Patent Owner is advised of the requirement to submit mandatory notice information under 37 C.F.R. § 42.8(a)(2) within 21 days of service of the petition.

The parties are advised that under 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c), recognition of counsel pro hac vice requires a showing of good cause.

Many non-profit organizations, both inside and outside the intellectual property field, offer alternative dispute resolution services.

If the parties actually engage in alternative dispute resolution, the PTAB would be interested to learn what mechanism (e.g., arbitration, Case IPR2021-01283 Patent 10,695,575 mediation, etc.) was used and the general result.

Cite Document

Analyze