• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Active Filters1
Displaying 144-158 of 50,000 results

33 Order: Denying Change to Rescheduled Due Date 7

Document IPR2015-01977, No. 33 Order - Denying Change to Rescheduled Due Date 7 (P.T.A.B. Oct. 13, 2016)
2 IPR2015-01965 (Patent 7,884,713 B1) IPR2015-01977 (Patent 6,924,727 B2) 7, and Patent Owner informed us that none of its counsel has a conflict with the rescheduled Due Date 7.3 Nevertheless, in an effort to accommodate ...
cite Cite Document
Analyze

38 Order: Order Oral Argument

Document IPR2015-01977, No. 38 Order - Order Oral Argument (P.T.A.B. Oct. 26, 2016)
Patent Owner, Vivint, Incorporated (“Vivint”), requests thirty (30) minutes, in total, to present arguments in Case IPR2015-01965 (Paper 31), and requests seventy-five (75) minutes, in total, to present arguments in Case IPR2015-01977 (Paper 36).
The parties must initiate a conference call with us at least two (2) business days prior to the hearing date to resolve any dispute over the propriety of each party’s demonstrative exhibits.
For further guidance on what constitutes an appropriate demonstrative exhibit, the parties are directed to CBS Interactive Inc. v. Helferich Patent Licensing, LLC, Case IPR2013-00033 (PTAB Oct. 23, 2013) (Paper 118).
We take this opportunity to remind the parties that each presenter must identify clearly and specifically each demonstrative exhibit, e.g., by slide or screen number, referenced during the hearing to ensure the clarity and accuracy of the reporter’s transcript.
The parties also should note that two members of the panel will be attending the hearing electronically from remote locations.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

8 Notice of Filing Date Accorded to Petition: Notice of Filing Date Accorded to Petition

Document IPR2016-00161, No. 8 Notice of Filing Date Accorded to Petition - Notice of Filing Date Accorded to Petition (P.T.A.B. Nov. 13, 2015)
Patent Owner may file a preliminary response to the petition no later than three months from the date of this notice.
For more information, please consult the Office Patent Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed. Reg. 48756 (Aug. 14, 2012), which is available on the Board Web site at http://www.uspto.gov/PTAB.
Patent Owner is advised of the requirement to submit mandatory notice information under 37 C.F.R. § 42.8(a)(2) within 21 days of service of the petition.
The parties are advised that under 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c), recognition of counsel pro hac vice requires a showing of good cause.
Such motions shall be filed in accordance with the “Order -- Authorizing Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission” in Case IPR2013-00639, Paper 7, a copy of which is available on the Board Web site under “Representative Orders, Decisions, and Notices.” The parties are reminded that unless otherwise permitted by 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(b)(2), all filings in this proceeding must be made electronically in the Patent Review Processing System (PRPS), accessible from the Board Web site at http://www.uspto.gov/PTAB.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

4 Notice Notice filing date accorded: Notice Notice filing date accorded

Document IPR2021-01283, No. 4 Notice Notice filing date accorded - Notice Notice filing date accorded (P.T.A.B. Sep. 9, 2021)
For more information, please consult the Office Patent Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed. Reg. 48756 (Aug. 14, 2012), which is available on the Board Web site at http://www.uspto.gov/PTAB.
Patent Owner is advised of the requirement to submit mandatory notice information under 37 C.F.R. § 42.8(a)(2) within 21 days of service of the petition.
The parties are advised that under 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c), recognition of counsel pro hac vice requires a showing of good cause.
Many non-profit organizations, both inside and outside the intellectual property field, offer alternative dispute resolution services.
If the parties actually engage in alternative dispute resolution, the PTAB would be interested to learn what mechanism (e.g., arbitration, Case IPR2021-01283 Patent 10,695,575 mediation, etc.) was used and the general result.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

10 Notice refund approved: Notice refund approved

Document IPR2021-01283, No. 10 Notice refund approved - Notice refund approved (P.T.A.B. Apr. 5, 2022)
Petitioner’s request for a refund of certain post-institution fees paid on August 5, 2021 in the above proceeding is hereby granted.
The amount of $22,500.00 has been refunded to Petitioner’s deposit account.
The parties are reminded that unless otherwise permitted by 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(b)(2), all filings in this proceeding must be made electronically in the Patent Trial and Appeal Board End to End (PTAB E2E), accessible from the Board Web site at http://www.uspto.gov/PTAB.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

8 Institution Decision Deny: Institution Decision Deny

Document IPR2021-01283, No. 8 Institution Decision Deny - Institution Decision Deny (P.T.A.B. Mar. 4, 2022)
The parties additionally identify the following proceeding closed due to settlement as a related matter: Certain Non-Invasive Aesthetic Body Contouring Devices, Components Thereof, and Methods of Using the Same, Inv. No. 337-TA-1219 (ITC), filed August 5, 2020.
The ’575 patent describes problems with prior art methods for enhancing a patient’s visual appearance by applying magnetic fields, including low energy efficiency and generating unwanted heat.
Figure 2, above, illustrates a block diagram of the Magstim Model 20013 monophasic stimulator including a transformer, charging circuitry, a capacitor, an electronic switch, and a coil.
Burnett ’185 describes that “[t]he internal circuitry of the logic controller 20 comprises or alternatively consists of a transformer, a capacitor, an inducting coil, a diode, and a switch.” Ex. 1024, 6:66–7:1 (emphasis added).
In re Kuhle, 526 F.2d 553, 555 (CCPA 1975) (“Use of such a means of electrical connection in lieu of those used in the references solves no stated problem and would be an obvious matter of design choice within the skill [in] the art.” (citations omitted)).
cite Cite Document
Analyze

43 Final Decision: Final Written Decision

Document IPR2016-00161, No. 43 Final Decision - Final Written Decision (P.T.A.B. May. 10, 2017)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

46 Order: Federal Circuit Decision

Document IPR2016-00161, No. 46 Order - Federal Circuit Decision (P.T.A.B. Feb. 26, 2019)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

47 Order: Federal Circuit Mandate

Document IPR2016-00161, No. 47 Order - Federal Circuit Mandate (P.T.A.B. Feb. 26, 2019)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

13 Institution Decision: Decision Institution of Inter Partes Review

Document IPR2015-00324, No. 13 Institution Decision - Decision Institution of Inter Partes Review (P.T.A.B. Jun. 15, 2015)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

12 Order: Order Granting Petitioners Motions for Admission Pro Hac Vice

Document IPR2015-01977, No. 12 Order - Order Granting Petitioners Motions for Admission Pro Hac Vice (P.T.A.B. Mar. 11, 2016)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

37 Order Conduct of Proceeding: Order Conduct of the Proceeding

Document IPR2015-01977, No. 37 Order Conduct of Proceeding - Order Conduct of the Proceeding (P.T.A.B. Oct. 26, 2016)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

17 Order: Scheduling Order

Document IPR2016-00161, No. 17 Order - Scheduling Order (P.T.A.B. May. 12, 2016)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

16 Notice: Notice of Refund

Document IPR2015-02004, No. 16 Notice - Notice of Refund (P.T.A.B. May. 9, 2016)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

6 Notice of Filing Date Accorded to Petition: Notice of Filing Date Accorded to Petitio...

Document IPR2015-02004, No. 6 Notice of Filing Date Accorded to Petition - Notice of Filing Date Accorded to Petition and Time for Filing Patent Owner Preliminary Response (P.T.A.B. Oct. 8, 2015)

cite Cite Document
Analyze
<< 1 2 3 4 5 ... 10 11 12 13 14 ... >>