• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Displaying 84-98 of 144,520 results

37 Order Other: ORDER Conduct of the Proceeding Granting Patent Owner’s Motion to Expunge Exhibit 2050

Document IPR2023-00481, No. 37 Order Other - ORDER Conduct of the Proceeding Granting Patent Owner’s Motion to Expunge Exhibit 2050 (P.T.A.B. Mar. 14, 2024)
Before ZHENYU YANG, ROBERT A. POLLOCK, and TIMOTHY G. MAJORS, Administrative Patent Judges.
On March 13, 2024, Patent Owner wrote to the Board requesting expungement of Exhibit 2050.
According to Patent Owner, the as-filed version of Exhibit 2050 includes three paragraphs that comprise privileged information.
And, we find that good cause exists to grant that motion, which finding is premised on (a) Patent Owner’s unopposed representation that it inadvertently filed Exhibit 2050 in a form that includes the allegedly privileged information, and (b) Patent Owner’s promise to file a substitute, redacted-version of Exhibit 2050 if the Board authorizes expungement of the current, as-filed version.
The as-filed version of Exhibit 2050 is, at present, accessible by the parties and the Board only, and is subject to a pending motion to seal based on the alleged confidential nature of information (e.g., drug development IPR2023-00480 (Patent 7,713,947 B2) IPR2023-00481 (Patent 8,377,903 B2) plans) in that exhibit.
cite Cite Document

No. 242 SO ORDERED Granting Stipulated Protective Order (D.I. 37 in 23-cv-1103-RGA; D.I. 241 in 21-md-3017-RGA-LDH)

Document In Re: Xarelto (Rivaroxaban) ('310) Patent Litigation, 1:21-md-03017, No. 242 (D.Del. Mar. 6, 2024)
outside consultants or experts and their staffs retained by the parties or their attorneys for purposes of this action, who are not objected to pursuant to ¶ 8, and who first agree to be bound by the terms of this Protective Order by executing a copy of the Undertaking attached hereto as Exhibit A;
outside consultants or experts and their staffs retained by the parties or their attorneys for purposes of this action, who are not objected to pursuant to ¶ 8, and who first agree to be bound by the terms of this Protective Order by executing a copy of the Undertaking attached hereto as Exhibit A;
If the issue is raised with the Court, the party opposing disclosure shall bear the burden of proof with respect to the propriety of its objection and blocking of said individual from serving as an expert or consultant in this case.
For purposes of this section, it shall be irrelevant which party initially discovers the inadvertently or mistakenly produced items that are otherwise properly subject to a claim of attorney-client privilege, work product immunity, or on any other protection from discovery.
Notwithstanding the foregoing or a successful challenge under ¶ 16, and subject to a continuing obligation to protect all such material pursuant to this order, outside counsel may retain any archive copies of any filings, court papers, correspondence, deposition and trial transcripts, deposition and trial exhibits, expert reports, written discovery responses, and attorney work product (regardless of whether such materials contain or reference CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION or HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION for archival records).
cite Cite Document

No. 234 SO ORDERED Granting (D.I. 18 in 23-cv-690-RGA; D.I. 232 in 21-md-3017-RGA-LDH) Stipulation ...

Document In Re: Xarelto (Rivaroxaban) ('310) Patent Litigation, 1:21-md-03017, No. 234 (D.Del. Feb. 27, 2024)
INDOCO REMEDIES LIMITED and
Pursuant to Rules 41(a)(l) and 41(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiffs Bayer Intellectual Property GmbH, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer AG, and Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) and Defendants Indoco Remedies Limited and FPP Holding Company LLC (collectively, “Indoco”), hereby stipulate and agree that Plaintiffs’ action against Indoco and Indoco’s action against Plaintiffs, including all claims and defenses asserted by Plaintiffs against Indoco and all claims and defenses asserted by Indoco against Plaintiffs, are hereby dismissed with prejudice.
All parties shall bear their own costs, disbursements and attorneys’ fees.
cite Cite Document

No. 235 SO ORDERED Granting (D.I. 233 in 21-md-3017-RGA-LDH; D.I. 15 in 23-cv-327-RGA) Stipulation ...

Document In Re: Xarelto (Rivaroxaban) ('310) Patent Litigation, 1:21-md-03017, No. 235 (D.Del. Feb. 27, 2024)
APOTEX INC. and APOTEX CORP., Defendants. )
Pursuant to Rules 41(a)(l) and 41(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiffs Bayer Intellectual Property GmbH, Bayer AG, and Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) and Defendants Apotex Inc. and Apotex Corp. (collectively, “Apotex” or “Defendants”), hereby stipulate and agree that Plaintiffs’ action against Apotex in C.A.
No. 23- 327-RGA and Apotex’s action against Plaintiffs in C.A.
No. 23-327-RGA, including all claims and defenses asserted by Plaintiffs against Apotex and all claims, defenses and counterclaims asserted by Apotex against Plaintiffs therein, are hereby dismissed with prejudice.
All parties shall bear their own costs, disbursements and attorneys’ fees.
cite Cite Document

33 Order Other: Order DECISION Granting Patent Owner’s Unopposed Motions for Pro Hac Vice Admission of David Mlaver and Mary Pheng 37 CFR § 4210c

Document IPR2023-00480, No. 33 Order Other - Order DECISION Granting Patent Owner’s Unopposed Motions for Pro Hac Vice Admission of David Mlaver and Mary Pheng 37 CFR § 4210c (P.T.A.B. Feb...
Log in to see more
cite Cite Document

33 Order Other: Order DECISION Granting Patent Owner’s Unopposed Motions for Pro Hac Vice Admission of David Mlaver and Mary Pheng 37 CFR § 4210c

Document IPR2023-00481, No. 33 Order Other - Order DECISION Granting Patent Owner’s Unopposed Motions for Pro Hac Vice Admission of David Mlaver and Mary Pheng 37 CFR § 4210c (P.T.A.B. Feb...
Log in to see more
cite Cite Document

No. 220 SCHEDULING ORDER: Joinder of Parties due by 8/23/2024

Document In Re: Xarelto (Rivaroxaban) ('310) Patent Litigation, 1:21-md-03017, No. 220 (D.Del. Feb. 12, 2024)
Scheduling Order
Log in to see more
cite Cite Document

26 Order Other: Order Granting Petitioners Motions for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Christina E Dashe and John Christopher Rozendaal 37 CFR 4210

Document IPR2023-00480, No. 26 Order Other - Order Granting Petitioners Motions for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Christina E Dashe and John Christopher Rozendaal 37 CFR 4210 (P.T.A.B. Jan. 26, 202...
Log in to see more
cite Cite Document

26 Order Other: Order Granting Petitioners Motions for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Christina E Dashe and John Christopher Rozendaal 37 CFR 4210

Document IPR2023-00481, No. 26 Order Other - Order Granting Petitioners Motions for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Christina E Dashe and John Christopher Rozendaal 37 CFR 4210 (P.T.A.B. Jan. 26, 202...
Log in to see more
cite Cite Document

No. 211 SO ORDERED Granting (D.I. 210 in 21-md-3017-RGA-LDH; D.I. 17 in 23-cv-665-RGA) Stipulation ...

Document In Re: Xarelto (Rivaroxaban) ('310) Patent Litigation, 1:21-md-03017, No. 211 (D.Del. Jan. 25, 2024)
Log in to see more
cite Cite Document

No. 96

Document BTL Industries, Inc. v. Nextwellness USA LLC, 6:22-cv-01477, No. 96 (M.D.Fla. Jan. 3, 2024)

cite Cite Document

No. 159

Document Bayer Pharma AG et al v. Lupin Limited et al, 1:21-cv-00314, No. 159 (D.Del. Dec. 15, 2023)

cite Cite Document

No. 203

Document In Re: Xarelto (Rivaroxaban) ('310) Patent Litigation, 1:21-md-03017, No. 203 (D.Del. Dec. 15, 2023)

cite Cite Document

No. 86

Document BTL Industries, Inc. v. Nextwellness USA LLC, 6:22-cv-01477, No. 86 (M.D.Fla. Nov. 29, 2023)

cite Cite Document

No. 501

Document TwinStrand Biosciences, Inc. et al v. Guardant Health, Inc., 1:21-cv-01126, No. 501 (D.Del. Nov. 29, 2023)

cite Cite Document
<< 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... >>