I certify that I have served The Episcopal Church in South Carolina’s (“TECSC”) Notice of Appeal on all counsel of record by depositing a copy of, it in the United States Mail, postage prepaid, on January 13, 2014.

January 13, 2014 Via FedEx (tracking no.: 797614123678) The Honorable Jenny Abbott Kitchings Clerk, South Carolina Court of Appeals 1015 Sumter Street Columbia, S.C. 29201 RE: The Protestant Episcopal Church in the Diocese of South Carolina, et al. v. The Episcopal Church et al., Case No. 2013—CP—18—00013 Dear Ms. Kitchings: Enclosed for filing is one (1) original and one (1) copy of the notice of appeal in the above—referenced case.

Use of this system constitutes your agreement to the sen/ice conditions in the current FedEx Service Guide, available on fedex.com.FedEx will not be responsible for any claim in excess of $100 per package, whether the result of loss, damage, delay, non—delivery,misdelivery,or misinfonnation, unless you declare a higher value, pay an additional charge, document your actual loss and file a timely claim.Limitations found in the current FedEx Service Guide apply.

Your right to recover from FedEx for any loss, including intrinsic value of the package, loss of sales, income interest, profit, attorney's fees, costs, and other forms of damage whether direct, incidental,consequential,-or special is limited to the greater of $100 or the authorized declared value’, Recovery cannot exceed actual documented Ioss.Maximum for items of extraordinary value is $1,000, e.g. jewelry, precious metals, negptiableginstruments and other items listed in our ServiceGuide.

SEPTEMBER l9’ 2013 , ) By Motion dated September 19, 2013, the Defendant TECSC (hereinafter Defendant) sought production of documents from the Plaintiffs, The Protestant Episcopal Church in the Diocese of South Carolina and the Trustees of The Protestant Episcopal Church in South Carolina, (collectively hereinafter referenced as “the Plaintiffs”).

The documents requested are the following: Produce all correspondence and other communications, including 11. emails, prior to November 17, 2012, between Bishop Mark J. Lawrence and C. Alan Runyan referring, relating to, concerning, or discussing the relationship between the Diocese of South Carolina and the Episcopal Church.

New managers installed as a result of take over, merger, loss of confidence by shareholders, or simply normal succession, may waive the attorney-client privilege with respect to communications made by former officers and directors.

In Wilson vs. Preston, 378 S.C. 348, 662 S.E.2d 580 (S.C. 2008), the South Carolina Supreme Court held that an individual council member cannot independently review attorney-client privileged documents Page 3 of 5