• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Active Filters1
Displaying 69-83 of 50,000 results

HETEROARYL COMPOUNDS AND THEIR USE

Docket 16/474,461, U.S. Patent Application (June 27, 2019)
Art Group1629
Case TypeUtility - 514/245000
Class514
Inventor Ana Maria GARCÍA COLLAZO
Inventor Xavier BARRIL ALONSO
Inventor Elena CUBERO JORDÀ
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

11 Institution Decision: Trial Instituted Document

Document IPR2019-00150, No. 11 Institution Decision - Trial Instituted Document (P.T.A.B. Jun. 18, 2019)
Petitioner explains that Picard and Ishihara both teach apparatuses that determine surface topology of an object using a source, a beam splitter, and focusing optics arranged in similar manners to produce light at different focal planes.
a. The Dispute Regarding Whether Picard Teaches “A Module Positioned in the Optical Path and Configured to Generate a Plurality of Incident Light Beams.” Petitioner asserts that Picard’s Nipkow disk 8 and affixed mask 24 each correspond to the “module” recited in claim 17.
Patent Owner argues that (1) Picard and Ishihara “operate in fundamentally different ways” (id. at 36–37) and (2) Petitioner’s “assemblage of discrete elements without addressing why a [person of ordinary skill in the art] would have combined them in the manner proposed has all the hallmarks of impermissible hindsight” (id. at 37–38).
We find that Petitioner’s evidence and arguments show sufficiently, for this stage of the proceeding, that a person of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to combine the teachings of Picard and Ishihara with a reasonable expectation of success, notwithstanding Patent Owner’s allegations of fundamental differences between the references.
Patent Owner’s arguments assume, without demonstrating persuasively, that (1) modifying Picard to use telecentric optics like Ishihara’s would involve changing Picard’s system to use a shifting focal plane like Ishihara’s, and (2) that this would defeat a reasonable expectation of success.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

12 Order: Scheduling Order

Document IPR2019-00150, No. 12 Order - Scheduling Order (P.T.A.B. Jun. 18, 2019)
In stipulating to move any due dates in the scheduling order, the parties must be cognizant that the Board requires four weeks after the filing of an opposition to the motion to amend (or the due date for the opposition, if none is filed) for ...
cite Cite Document
Analyze

8 Institution Decision: Decision Instituting Inter Partes Review

Document IPR2019-00163, No. 8 Institution Decision - Decision Instituting Inter Partes Review (P.T.A.B. Jun. 11, 2019)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

9 Order: Scheduling Order

Document IPR2019-00163, No. 9 Order - Scheduling Order (P.T.A.B. Jun. 11, 2019)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

9 Order: Scheduling Order

Document IPR2019-00132, No. 9 Order - Scheduling Order (P.T.A.B. Jun. 11, 2019)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

9 Order: Scheduling Order

Document IPR2019-00153, No. 9 Order - Scheduling Order (P.T.A.B. Jun. 11, 2019)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

15 Institution Decision: Trial Instituted Document

Document IPR2019-00286, No. 15 Institution Decision - Trial Instituted Document (P.T.A.B. Jun. 10, 2019)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

8 Institution Decision: Trial Instituted Document

Document IPR2019-00132, No. 8 Institution Decision - Trial Instituted Document (P.T.A.B. Jun. 3, 2019)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

8 Institution Decision: Trial Instituted Document

Document IPR2019-00153, No. 8 Institution Decision - Trial Instituted Document (P.T.A.B. Jun. 3, 2019)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

8,9-DIHYDROIMIDAZO[1,2-a]PYRIMIDO[5,4-e]PYRIMIDIN-5(6H)-ONES

Docket 16/461,512, U.S. Patent Application (May 16, 2019)

cite Cite Docket
Analyze

13 Order: Conduct of the Proceeding37 CFR sec 425

Document IPR2019-00286, No. 13 Order - Conduct of the Proceeding37 CFR sec 425 (P.T.A.B. May. 8, 2019)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

10 Order: ORDER Conduct of the Proceeding

Document IPR2019-00286, No. 10 Order - ORDER Conduct of the Proceeding (P.T.A.B. Apr. 9, 2019)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

8 Order: Order 37 CFR 42100b

Document IPR2019-00151, No. 8 Order - Order 37 CFR 42100b (P.T.A.B. Mar. 26, 2019)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

8 Order: Order 37 CFR 42100b

Document IPR2019-00152, No. 8 Order - Order 37 CFR 42100b (P.T.A.B. Mar. 26, 2019)

cite Cite Document
Analyze
<< 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... >>