AND NOW, this 7th day of March 2025, upon consideration of the Motions for Class Certification [16-CM-27242: Doc. No. 84; 16-CB-27242: Doc. No. 134] and the Motions for Appointment of Lead Counsel for the End-payer Purchaser Classes [16-CM-27242: Doc. Nos. 179, 185; 16-CB-27242: Doc. No 235, 241], as well as the responses and replies thereto, and after hearings and arguments held on December 17, 2024, and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that EPPs’ motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part to exclude certification of the unjust enrichment class.

It is so ORDERED.

The Honorable Louis L. Stanton United States District Judge Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street New York, New York 10007 -, .

-~ Re: SEC v. Tournant, et al., No. 1:22-cv-04016-LLS Dear Judge Stanton: I am leaving employment with Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC").

Accordingly, I respectfully request that you order the Clerk of Court to terminate my appearance in the above-captioned case.

The SEC continues to be represented in this action by its other counsel who entered an appearance.

Respectfully submitted, Isl Timothy K. Halloran Timothy K .

In our order directing centralization, we held that the District of Massachusetts was an appropriate Section 1407 forum for actions sharing factual questions concerning allegations that “a vulnerability in Progress Software Company’s MOVEit Transfer and MOVEit Cloud file transfer services was exploited by a Russian cybergang in May 2023, which to date is estimated to have compromised the personally identifying information (PII) of over 55 million people.” See In re MOVEit Customer Data Sec.

The notice letter reveals that WPS experienced a breach of its MOVEit file transfer system in May 2023, like the MDL No. 3083 actions.

* behalf of a nationwide class of “[a]ll residents of the United States whose Personal Information was compromised as a result of the data breach.” See Schottel Compl.

But we have rejected individual convenience-based arguments against transfer to MDL No. 3083, finding that “we must consider the needs of all parties and view the litigation as a whole.” Id. at 1407.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is transferred to the District of Massachusetts and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Allison D. Burroughs for inclusion in the coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings.