• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
≥ 50,000 results

... TEXAS vs. TWO HUNDRED FIFTY-EIGHT THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED SEVEN DOLLARS $258,707.00 IN UNITED STATES C...

Docket DC-21-17545, Texas State, Dallas County, 14th District Court (Dec. 10, 2021)
ERIC MOYE', presiding
Division14th District
Case TypeSEIZURE/FORFEITURE
Defendant TWO HUNDRED FIFTY-EIGHT THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED SEVEN DOLLARS $258,707.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY AND TWO METABANK PREPAID CARDS
...
cite Cite Docket

PLAINTIFF'S ORIGINAL PETITION AND APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND INJUNCTION

Document MUNISH VASAYA vs. SHARJEEL SURANI, DC-24-18429, ORIGINAL PETITION 1-PLAINTIFFS_ORIGINAL_PETITION_AND_APPLICATION_FOR_TEMPORARY_RESTRAINING_ORDER_AND...
Altogether, Plaintiff sold these businesses for roughly $6 million, and his brother-in-law and business partner, Sharjeel Surani (“Defendant”), received half of the proceeds from thesales.
... any proceeds from the sale because Defendant has refused to provide Plaintiff with his half of the sales proceeds—some $2.7 million. Instead, Defendant lied about chargebacks associated with the sale and tried to withhold over $250,000 ...
... $250,000 from Plaintiff. Defendant has also repeatedly attempted to charge fees and expenses against Plaintiff's share of the sales proceeds, and, recently, Defendant represented that only $4 million is available, as opposed to the ...
... and Defendantreceived $3.9 million from the sale of one ofthe cell phone dealerships; $1.5 million from the sale of the other cell phone dealership; and $780,000 from the sale of the convenience store operations—in total, $6.18 million.
Defendant has also continued to assess new costs and fees against Plaintiffs portion of the sales proceeds—suchas the $250,000 chargeback that Defendant was going to “look into”after Plaintiff confronted him about—and has also sought to coerce Plaintiff into settling for a quarter (25%) of the sales proceeds. Defendant’s breach of the agreement between ...
... I sold another cell phone dealership for roughly $1.5 million, and a convenience store operation for approximately $780,000.00. Likewise, Defendant and I were to equally split the proceeds of the sale, i.e., 50/50, except for $250,000.00 ...
... $5.4 million, or $2.7 million. Defendant called me and, althoughstill refusing to release any such funds or pay me, told me that a $250,000 charge was going to be assessed against us by theseller, i.e., a chargeback. Immediately, I called ...
And I also paid Defendant around $250,000.00 in return for my interest as a partner in SS Distro and Vaporlab. 7. In sum, based on the foregoing, I have incurred approximately $6 million in damages based on Defendant’s actions, ...
cite Cite Document
Analyze
+ More Snippets

PLAINTIFF'S ORIGINAL PETITION FOR REVIEW OF APPRAISAL REVIEW BOARD ORDER

Document BLACK FOREST CC HOTEL LLC vs. DALLAS CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT, DC-24-15571, ORIGINAL PETITION 1-PLAINTIFFS_ORIGINAL_PETITION_FOR_REVIEW_OF_APPRAISAL_RE...
Pursuant to Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 47(c), Plaintiff is seeking monetary relief of $250,000 or less (attorneys’ fees) and other non-monetary, equitable relief (correction of the property’s value on the appraisalroll).
The Appraisal District notified Plaintiff that the value of the Property was appraised as follows for the 2024 tax year: Account Number Noticed Value 00000366506300000 $31,623,710 00000366506400100 $613,680 9.
The ARB determined the protest and made its order in which the appraised value of the Property was determined to be as follows for 2024: Account Number Final Value 00000366506300000 $29,846,480 00000366506400100 $613,680 ...
The Value History: Proposed/ Notified: ARBValue: $27,317,190 $25,539,960 Land $4,306,520 $4,306,520 Total $31,623,710 $29,846,480 Maxine Wiley Chairman, Appraisal Review Board John Ernst, Darrell Farris, James Landa Jul 18 ...
... property and: 1) the appraised or market value, as applicable, of the property as determined by the order is valued at $5 million or less and for all residence homesteads as determined by the order that is valued at more than $5 million; ...
The correct value is $613,680 according to the Market Value & Unequal Value protest0. Impr Value History: Proposed / Notified: ARBValue: Maxine Wiley Chairman, Appraisal Review Board John Ernst, Darrell Farris, James Landa Appraisal Review Board ...
cite Cite Document
+ More Snippets

PLAINTIFF'S ORIGINAL PETITION FOR REVIEW OF APPRAISAL REVIEW BOARD ORDER

Document 14200 REAL ESTATE, LLC vs. DALLAS CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT, DC-24-14809, ORIGINAL PETITION 1-PLAINTIFFS_ORIGINAL_PETITION_FOR_REVIEW_OF_APPRAISAL_REVIEW...
... May 1, 2024, Plaintiff was notified by Defendant that the value of the Property had been appraised for 2024 as follows: Property Owner Name aOuNm OP maCuuenls Number 24122500070020000 14200 Real Estate, LLC $1,915,000 ...
Thereafter, the Dallas County Appraisal Review Board determined the protest and made its order in which the appraised value of the Property was determined as follows for the 2024 tax year: $1,915,000 Property Owner Name 14200 ...
... property and: 1) the appraised or market value, as applicable, of the property as determined by the order is valued at $5 million or less and for all residence homesteads as determined by the order that is valued at more than $5 million; ...
The correct value is $1,915,000 Value History: Proposed / Notified: ARBValue: Maxine Wiley Chairman, Appraisal Review Board $1,004,200 $1,004,200 Land $910,800 $910,800 18 , 2024 Jul Date: Total $1,915,000 $1,915,000 ...
cite Cite Document
+ More Snippets

PLAINTIFF'S ORIGINAL PETITION FOR REVIEW OF APPRAISAL REVIEW BOARD ORDER

Document STATE BANK OF TEXAS vs. DALLAS CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT, DC-24-14787, ORIGINAL PETITION 1-PLAINTIFFS_ORIGINAL_PETITION_FOR_REVIEW_OF_APPRAISAL_REVIEW_...
... 2024, Plaintiff was notified by Defendant that the value of the Property had been appraised for 2024 as follows: Property Owner Name State Bank of Texas Property ID or Account Number 26051100000080000 Noticed Value $2,237,000 ...
Property ID or Account Number 26051100000080000 ARB Value $2,148,000 Plaintiff appeals the orders, copies of which are attached to and incorporated into this petition as Exhibit “A.” 8.
... property and 1) the appraised or market value, as applicable, of the property as determined by the order is valued at $5 million or less and for all resldence homesteads as determined by the order that is valued at more than $5 million: ...
The correct value is $2,148,000 according to the Market value & Unequal value protest o. OPV Value History: Proposed / Notified: ARB Value: Maxine Wile Chairman, Appraisal Review Board Douglas Timberlake, James Cox, Andrew Wilkerson Appraisal ...
cite Cite Document
+ More Snippets

SCHEDULING ORDER

Document ETHAN PRESTON, et al vs. RPB MANAGEMENT INC., et al, DC-24-19324, SCHEDULING ORDER 1-SCHEDULING_ORDER (Tex. St., Dallas Co., 14th District Ct. Feb. 3, 2025)
SIGNED: 3 $6M flair cc: Counsel of Record/Pro Se Parties and Mediator 2') District Judge / AGREED SCHEDULING ORDER (LEVEL 3) Page 3 of 4 AGREED To: LOVEIN | RIBMAN, P.C. By: /s/ David N. McDevitt David N. McDevitt State ...
cite Cite Document

DEFENDANT (POLO) MTN NEW TRIAL & SET ASIDE DEFAULT JUDGMENT

Document CRUNCHY ROLLERS, LLC, et al vs. POLO INTERNATIONAL, INC., DC-24-13191, Motion New Trial 1-DEFENDANT_POLO_MTN_NEW_TRIAL__SET_ASIDE_DEFAULT_JUDGMENT (Tex. St., D...
Plaintiffs claim that Polo owes $1,015,360.00 for the roof replacement, plus attorney’s fees, costs, and pre- and post- judgment interest at the highest allowable rate.
A copy of the Default Judgment is attached to this Motion as Exhibit A. Pursuant to the Default Judgment, Plaintiffs were awarded the principal amount of $1,015,360.00, plus prejudgment interest per annum, $21,836.59 in Plaintiffs’ ...
The Court finds that Plaintiff has been damaged in the principal amount of $1,015,360 by Defendant, plus prejudgment interest at 8.25% per annum frOm August 23, 2024, the date of filing, until the date ofjudgment.
It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUGED AND DECREED that Plaintiffs collectively recover the following from Defendants: The principal sum of $1,015,360, plus prejudgment interest thereon at the statuory rate of 8.25% per annum from the ...
cite Cite Document
+ More Snippets

ORIGINAL PETITION 1-VERIFIED_PETITION_AND_APPLICATION_FOR_INJUNC...

Document HIC IX LIMITED OWNER, LLC vs. COUSINS DALLAS LENDER, LLC, DC-25-00054, ORIGINAL PETITION 1-VERIFIED_PETITION_AND_APPLICATION_FOR_INJUNCTIVE_RELIEF_AND_TEMP...

cite Cite Document
1 2 3 4 5 ... >>